WestMichigan Posted July 9, 2012 Share #1 Posted July 9, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) Pardon a possibly stupid question, but which Sensor Swab Width have my fellow M8 Users had the most success with? I have a few swabs left from my EOS 1.6x crop sensor cleaning kit and I have to order some new supplies, but am confused whether to get the wider ones listed at the manufacturer's site for 1.3x sensors or stick with the 1.5/1.6x crop swabs. Sincerely Richard Ward Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 Hi WestMichigan, Take a look here Best M8 Sensor Swab Size?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted July 9, 2012 Share #2 Posted July 9, 2012 I always use one size "down". so 1.6 swabs are most practical for APS-H Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
honcho Posted July 9, 2012 Share #3 Posted July 9, 2012 Pardon a possibly stupid question, but which Sensor Swab Width have my fellow M8 Users had the most success with? Not a stupid question at all! I have one Nikon D3 (fx) that, illogically, is more successfully cleaned with a 1.6 size swab than with the recommended size. My other Nikon D3s and D4's are all cleaned with the full size swab. I don't own an M8, but the 1.6 swab should be ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lss- Posted July 9, 2012 Share #4 Posted July 9, 2012 I have used both 1.3x and 1.5/1.6x ones and prefer the 1.3x. Both are fine as far as I can tell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted July 10, 2012 Share #5 Posted July 10, 2012 I just did a clean on my M8 and the swab is still on the stick. 16 mm wide and it worked fine. I could not remove some of the tiny spots, so I did a second clean more slowly and they came up. Go flat to vertical as you sweep like the video on Copperhills site shows. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.