Hausen17 Posted July 1, 2012 Share #21 Posted July 1, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) + 1 on the Zeiss Sonnar. But if you want something cheaper the Canon 50/1.4 is a great buy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 1, 2012 Posted July 1, 2012 Hi Hausen17, Take a look here 50mm lens for an M2. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
250swb Posted July 1, 2012 Share #22 Posted July 1, 2012 If you are new to the world of Leica Adam it doesn't make much sense to go buying lenses by other manufacturers from day one. At least create a datum point for yourself before you start, not wake up sometime in the future wondering why you bought a Zeiss or a CV or any other substitute. They may be good lenses, but they won't satisfy the need to know. So I suggest a newer 50mm Summicron or a 50mm Elmar M to use with your M2. By all means try others in the future if you want some (possibly expensive) fun with other makes or vintage Leica lenses, but first find out what the fuss is about. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeTexas Posted July 2, 2012 Share #23 Posted July 2, 2012 On Friday there was a 50mm Summicron DR sans goggles sitting at my local camera repair shop for $375. www.professionalcamerarepair.com Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipus Posted July 3, 2012 Share #24 Posted July 3, 2012 On Friday there was a 50mm Summicron DR sans goggles sitting at my local camera repair shop for $375. www.professionalcamerarepair.com That is a good deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalArts 99 Posted July 3, 2012 Share #25 Posted July 3, 2012 I agree with what others have said. Just bite the bullet and get a modern 50mm Summicron. The M2 with a 50mm Summicron will last you the rest of your life. You'll be taking full advantage of why you chose to get a Leica in the first place. And if you move on to something else there's no risk as you can easily get your money back at the time of resale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted July 3, 2012 Share #26 Posted July 3, 2012 Thanks all for the replies. The elmar does sound appealing as it is collapsable. I will do a bit more research and see what I can find second hand. Be it known that purchasing second hand lens is risky unless you can inspect it in-person. Best of luck, and congratulations on the M2 which was my first Leica in 1964. Enjoy! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamcheasley Posted July 4, 2012 Author Share #27 Posted July 4, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) Thank you all. I now have a lens. The shop I went into had both a summicron and an M-Mount elmar (both 50mm, both second hand). In the end, I went for the elmar, as the compact size was appealing, also, it was £100 cheaper than the summicron. Now to run the first film through and await the results! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted July 4, 2012 Share #28 Posted July 4, 2012 Which version Elmar? (the older one has a focus tab, the newer style doesn't). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamcheasley Posted July 4, 2012 Author Share #29 Posted July 4, 2012 I'm pretty sure it's the old style. It has the little focus tab that locks into infinity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted July 4, 2012 Share #30 Posted July 4, 2012 Yes, that's the older style lens, circa 1950's. I have one myself, I'm sure you'll be pleased with the results. It's a tad soft wide open (which isn't a criticism by the way, I see it as a benefit), fine from f4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joseph_galilee Posted July 9, 2012 Share #31 Posted July 9, 2012 Any Leitz 50 is an good choice, that's it. On my M2 there is an early canadian version f/1.5 5cm Summarit, M attach. Unique fingerprint OOF and who say not sharp wide open; my sample it's sharp (... not like ASPH version!). Important thing to find an sample with mint lenses, with no haze and no clean signs. Amazed color pastel. Mechanics state of art. Yes, the next Summilux will be better, but this lens surprised by the beauty and uniqueness of character. The Noctilux has the same optical design; surely significant. Lehitraot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveO Posted July 9, 2012 Share #32 Posted July 9, 2012 What does the DR mean in front of the Summicron. Is it Dual Range? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AB007 Posted July 10, 2012 Share #33 Posted July 10, 2012 What does the DR mean in front of the Summicron. Is it Dual Range? Yes. This is an interesting read : Leica M 50/2 Dual Range Summicron Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
traveler_101 Posted July 17, 2012 Share #34 Posted July 17, 2012 I just wonder: what would have been on the camera when it was sold? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Posted July 18, 2012 Share #35 Posted July 18, 2012 Joseph mentioned the Summarit. Lovely lens. I just wonder: what would have been on the camera when it was sold? It would seem a 5cm rigid Summicron chrome. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/182694-50mm-lens-for-an-m2/?do=findComment&comment=2065232'>More sharing options...
andybarton Posted July 18, 2012 Share #36 Posted July 18, 2012 My M2 permanently wears a DR Summicron of a very similar age and the combination works very well together. It looks "right" and the lens is first class quality. Be aware that DR Summicrons do not work on M8s and M9s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted July 18, 2012 Share #37 Posted July 18, 2012 I just wonder: what would have been on the camera when it was sold? It would have been whatever the customer chose to buy, a contemporary lens - most likely a 35 or 50mm - or maybe an LTM lens with adaptor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
normclarke Posted July 18, 2012 Share #38 Posted July 18, 2012 I think that most new M2's would have had the Elmar mounted. But as has been stated it would have been the original owner's choice. Best, normclarke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted July 18, 2012 Share #39 Posted July 18, 2012 In the E. Leitz catalog #41 from 1968 the M2 had several different stock numbers, sold either body only or as a starter kit with 35 Summaron 2.8, or 50 Elmar 2.8, or rigid Summicron, or DR Summicron, or 50 Summilux. So any of these would be "correct." The M2 I used in 68 had an Elmar 2.8 - and I still think that's a great combination. Back then the Elmar was $88! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.