Jump to content

Photokina predictions


IWC Doppel

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hmmmm - 9/17 (or 17/9 for some) - must be introducing the M9.17 (Leica apparently didn't have time to complete a full M9.2). My wife's birthday, in any event. I wonder what she'll get m.....I mean, what I'll get her....?

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 320
  • Created
  • Last Reply

whatever it is, the product it replaces was cheaper.

whatever it is, somebody here with no

intention to ever buy it will find fault with the design choices.

whatever it is, others will buy

it just to have it and never use it to it's full potential.

 

and the panasonic version will be just as good at 1/3 the price

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Panasonic come out with a FF rangefinder at Photokina I'd be more than a little surprised. This is one reason why I don't think the M10 will be CMOS as we know it. I would not at a be surprised if it is something very different. With the interest in rangefinders I'd want a strong patent and sufficient sustainable differentiation from the 4/3 wanna be's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest snowboarder
Two cameras, two prices, one mount, one system.

 

We will see a M camera with electronic viewfinder, at a lower price than the classical M with optical viewfinder.

 

I hope you're right! I hope the electronic M will be full frame though, it would really

be quite pointless if it's a crop camera. Would be extremely hard for Leica to charge

a few thousand $ for it when NEX 5 is $500... If it's a FF, I'm the first in line.

I don't need and don't want a rangefinder, I need a modern FF camera for my M glass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you're right! I hope the electronic M will be full frame though, it would really

be quite pointless if it's a crop camera. Would be extremely hard for Leica to charge

a few thousand $ for it when NEX 5 is $500... If it's a FF, I'm the first in line.

I don't need and don't want a rangefinder, I need a modern FF camera for my M glass.

 

Fully agree. After following all the discussions here in the forum, about what kind of camera would be true to the spirit of the M line, it probably is the best to have 2 different M models - one keeping the optical viewfinder and mostly hiding the electronic part from the user as the more traditional and expensive model, and one which completely goes forward, is live view only and potentially significantly cheaper as the precision viewfinder is a huge cost factor (and the main reason for a services visit). Furthermore, there would be more freedom in the design of such an M-Electronic, allowing for a smaller camera (more looking like the X2). But indeed, it would have to be FF to be really interesting - there are enough crop cameras from Sony and others already.

 

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

M10 with CMOS for better ISO at expense of Leica colors.

 

Consumer grade ++ intro Leica. Use will set the hook for better stuff.

 

Replacement digi R with evil VF, probably third party build. Dust off the R glass and send yours in for all need repairs now to avoid the rush.

 

Expanded lens line for S system, 350 and a short zoom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two FF cameras? Leica would have two of them already with the MM and the M10, the latter becoming an EVIL with its EVF on, and even three FF cams with the "ME" according to some rumors. :rolleyes: This has no common sense IMHO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two FF cameras? Leica would have two of them already with the MM and the M10, the latter becoming an EVIL with its EVF on, and even three FF cams with the "ME" according to some rumors. :rolleyes: This has no common sense IMHO.

As of now there are two, the M9 and the M Monochrom. If the M9 was going to be replaced by an M10 with a CMOS sensor and live-view on the one hand and a kind of ‘classic’ M (the rumoured ME) on the other, wouldn’t that make sense? I could see a market for all three models.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As of now there are two, the M9 and the M Monochrom. If the M9 was going to be replaced by an M10 with a CMOS sensor and live-view on the one hand and a kind of ‘classic’ M (the rumoured ME) on the other, wouldn’t that make sense? I could see a market for all three models.

 

It makes no sense whatsoever unless the least expensive is still so expensive that the vociferous, the real users, find the price daunting and the pride-of-ownership people find the price high enough to be exclusive.

 

pssst! (That's a cat sound)

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...