Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Just got mine today :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Got mine last week :p

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 75er Summilux is a tricky beast but I love that "damn" thing ;)

 

I had just a few hours off, so I took some 1st samples just next to my hotel....

No, I`m not a vampire bat :D

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
I dislike portraits where the camera is placed less than 5 feet from the subject. Features are distorted, simple optical laws.

 

If you want tight head shots, a 135 or perhaps 90 is a better choice.

 

Of course, therefore I prefer the Summilux 75 cropped on a M8 for about 100mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dislike portraits where the camera is placed less than 5 feet from the subject. Features are distorted, simple optical laws.

 

If you want tight head shots, a 135 or perhaps 90 is a better choice.

 

I dislike portraits where the camera is placed more than 5 feet from the subject. Features look like a pancake, simple optical laws.

 

If you want tight head shots, a close focussing 50 or perhaps 75 or 85 is a better choice.

 

See, that is how subjective this point is.

 

I know photographers, who prefer to do head shots with a 300/2.8, others swear by a 70-200 for head shots, others - like myself love to shoot head and shoulders with a 50mm.

 

There are absolutely no rules for what has to be made how.

 

I even shoot portraits with a 35mm, heck sometimes even a 21mm - who says, you have to push a wide angle up the nose of a subject, to get a true potato nose - you got to be creative with focal lengths or you end up with American corporate portraits in mass production.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I dislike portraits where the camera is placed less than 5 feet from the subject. Features are distorted, simple optical laws.

 

If you want tight head shots, a 135 or perhaps 90 is a better choice.

 

Therefore the 75 is ideal for doubleportraits.

And for babies and children this distance - psychology is different imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I sent my Summilux off for a service and adjustment and it has come back a new lens. It's sharp wide open now, much better than it was. I would urge anyone who thinks they have a soft copy to have it looked at.

 

Stunning, heavenly lens. This, to me, is the essence of Leica and is what defines the legacy and brand. It's pretty much untouchable.

Edited by Paul J
  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine is SN 3837xxx and says Made in Canada. I could care where it's made as it is superb and is currently with Leica to have it changed to Made in Germany and 6 bit coded since I like to know what lens was used on each image since I almost never remember to manually change it. That's just me.

 

Just joking about Made in Germany.

 

Just now took a look at mine and it does say Made in Germany.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question, the 75mm f/1.4 first manufactured in Canada, then moved to Germany and soon after stopped production. My question why is Leica now producing a newer, slower, f/2 version, it seems like Leica is not producing a faster version now, WHY. :confused:

 

If you compare the 75/2 and the 75/1.4 in person it's easy to see why - the /2 feels like half the size of the /1.4! (even the 90/2 feels half the size, to be fair.)

I sold my 75 1.4, and I don't regret it. I loved it while I had it, but very rarely used it after getting the 50 1.4. I'm still toying with the idea of the 75/2 though..

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I wasn't concerned about weight, I would carry the 90/2 (for its sharpness), the 75/1.4 (for its character), the 50/0.95 (for its different character), 28/2 (for its useable field of view), 21/1.4 & 15/2.8 (for their drama).

 

Every time I take out the 75/1.4 it astonishes me for its crispness stopped down, and for its Noctilux f1 character wide open. I can se why it was Mandler's favourite.

 

Cheers

John

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

My 75 Lux is not perfect. But for what I use it for; it is pretty damn close to perfection. It's sharp, yet soft. It's warm, yet cool. It draws light as a fine painter would. For example: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/people/288816-summer-breeze.html

 

For those that enjoy photographing people; I'd go as far as saying the 75 Lux should be the foundation of your lens kit.

 

 

Edit: for closer inspection:

Edited by Gerard
To add URL
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

One of my first shots with my 75/1.4.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Two from my first encounter, a truly wonderful lens

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

If I wasn't concerned about weight, I would carry the 90/2 (for its sharpness), the 75/1.4 (for its character), the 50/0.95 (for its different character), 28/2 (for its useable field of view), 21/1.4 & 15/2.8 (for their drama).

 

Every time I take out the 75/1.4 it astonishes me for its crispness stopped down, and for its Noctilux f1 character wide open. I can se why it was Mandler's favourite.

 

Cheers

John

 

I agree John, stopped down it's jaw dropping. Combine that with the extra magnification you get with the focal length and it's relative close focusing and it's even more impressive what it can reveal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...