Jump to content

John Milich - very disappointed


jaapv

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

In February I ordered an LTM adapter. After a few weeks I inquired, got a prompt response he would look into it. Three weeks after that I inquired once again, attaching the Paypal payment confirmation. No reponse. Last week I asked again. No response. So. Four months, money lost and no adapter. What now? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you people order these uber-expensive adapters from problematic, quirky guys who send things late and won't communicate?

 

They are just pieces of metal that attach lenses.

 

The micro four thirds cameras focus with live view and you see what the sensor sees, so the exact precision of the adapter makes no difference at all.

 

Get the cheapest China-made eBay adapter and be happy and save your money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And miss focus because of bad tolerances Have a wobbly lens and mess with hand coding - be happy with your el- cheapo savings ;) And i didn't know the M9 was micro 4/3rds...:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assumed you were ordering a micro four thirds adapter.

 

The LTM adapter is even simpler.

 

I have plenty of cheap LTM adapters that are perfect. No problemo.

 

While you might worry about wobblies and misfocus, you don't have an adapter at all, and I am taking pictures with mine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you people order these uber-expensive adapters from problematic, quirky guys who send things late and won't communicate?

 

They are just pieces of metal that attach lenses.

 

The micro four thirds cameras focus with live view and you see what the sensor sees, so the exact precision of the adapter makes no difference at all.

 

Get the cheapest China-made eBay adapter and be happy and save your money.

 

I have a cheap China made adapter and it fits - but the lens settles at 90 degrees to its usual position, leaving focussing scale at 3 o'clock, which makes it quite tricky to use effectively. It also has that nice scraapey feel that cheapness imparts when it gets too close to expensive equipment....:eek:

 

Consequently I don't actually have a camera, cheap or not, that I would risk putting the Cheap Chinese Adapter on.

 

John Millich's adapters work perfectly straight out of the box and are machined in what I take to be either brass or bronze. You never worry about using them with expensive or precious lenses or camera bodies.

 

I ordered an adapter from him just around Christmas time and got it about a week, might have been 10 days later, so unless something has changed drastically the service is normally good.

 

I'd chase again and let him sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assumed you were ordering a micro four thirds adapter.

 

The LTM adapter is even simpler.

 

I have plenty of cheap LTM adapters that are perfect. No problemo.

 

While you might worry about wobblies and misfocus, you don't have an adapter at all, and I am taking pictures with mine.

 

Don'worry, i have plenty Cv ones. I just want a codable one for my new CV 75.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So your logic is as follows:

 

I have one Chinese adapter that is faulty. Ergo, all Chinese adapters are faulty.

 

You could also say:

 

I have one Leica M9 that stopped working two days out of the box. Ergo, all Leica M9s will stop working

 

I have beautifully made Chinese adapters milled from brass and chrome that are within perfect tolerances and very inexpensive.

 

 

I have a cheap China made adapter and it fits - but the lens settles at 90 degrees to its usual position, leaving focussing scale at 3 o'clock, which makes it quite tricky to use effectively. It also has that nice scraapey feel that cheapness imparts when it gets too close to expensive equipment....:eek:

 

Consequently I don't actually have a camera, cheap or not, that I would risk putting the Cheap Chinese Adapter on.

 

John Millich's adapters work perfectly straight out of the box and are machined in what I take to be either brass or bronze. You never worry about using them with expensive or precious lenses or camera bodies.

 

I ordered an adapter from him just around Christmas time and got it about a week, might have been 10 days later, so unless something has changed drastically the service is normally good.

 

I'd chase again and let him sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can read the eBay feedbacks and make a good guess.

 

On the other hand, you can get twenty Chinese adapters for the price of one from the expensive "quirky craftsman" guy.

 

If one or two are no good, you are still way ahead.

 

I test mine by putting one on a lens and taking a picture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don'worry, i have plenty Cv ones. I just want a codable one for my new CV 75.

 

The f 1,8, I suppose.... curios and someway intriguing lens... How is your feeling about ?

 

btw... "one man shops" can be incredibly slow... it's 3 months I'm waiting for my (simple, but non-standard) ring for 800 on Viso... :o... so good that I wasn't asked to pay in advance : the shop has my focusing unit, for ring matching, as hostage... :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS: These are really excellent. Well made, but not coded. They are dead on accurate:

 

M39 LSM LTM 50 - 75 Lens to Leica M Screw-Mount Adapter | eBay

 

Yes but the point is that Jaap wants one that can be coded, given the image is correct that one won't code

 

Ps My previous point is that quality control is a problem for for the type of aftermarket adapter that I have obtained from Chinese sources, not that there is a logical extention that all aftermarket adapters are defective ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The f 1,8, I suppose.... curios and someway intriguing lens... How is your feeling about ?

 

btw... "one man shops" can be incredibly slow... it's 3 months I'm waiting for my (simple, but non-standard) ring for 800 on Viso... :o... so good that I wasn't asked to pay in advance : the shop has my focusing unit, for ring matching, as hostage... :p

 

Hep... I wrote it wrong... CV 75 1,8 is in BM... :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it is the 2.5. I have no intention of farting around with hand coding and don't particularly mind paying those extra few dollars, so what is wrong with a JLM adapter? Except that it does not appear...:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a cheap China made adapter and it fits - but the lens settles at 90 degrees to its usual position, leaving focussing scale at 3 o'clock, which makes it quite tricky to use effectively.

 

Yes but if was an LTM adapter its working perfectly, you may have needed a CV adapter.

 

A lot of LTM lenses were designed to be offset to the left looking from the rear, so people could read the focus scale if an accessory was mounted in the hotshoe of an LTM body. So if an adapter mounts a lens offset its designed to mount LTM lenses. And the reason you would want the LTM lens to remain offset if you use an adapter is because the focus throw begins and ends in the original position. Mount the lens on an adapter that makes it sit square and your finger ends up blocking the viewfinder window at close distances. Most if not all of the Chinses LTM adapters you are criticising are doing everything right in maintaining that offset. But if you put a CV or other lens on it (for instance) the lens may be offset, so you needed a CV adapter for M39 which may mount it square.

 

So, so many people have a go at the Chinses LTM adapters for this perceived 'fault' it needs clearing up, they are right, you are wrong.

 

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...