TshawM8 Posted May 16, 2011 Share #1 Posted May 16, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) I searched for a thread to answer my question, but couldn't get the information I really wanted. I am going to be living in the UK for awhile and want a new lens for my M8, primarily for architecture. I am split between the 28 2.8 elmarit or the 24 3.8 elmar. I am worried that the 28 just wont be wide enough to get the buildings that I want, but if I go inside that the 3.8 will be too slow Opinions on these two lenses and ONLY these two lenses would be appreciated. I understand how amazing the 28 cron is and how incredible the 24 lux is, but I am in college. Cheers, Thomas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 16, 2011 Posted May 16, 2011 Hi TshawM8, Take a look here Lens Help. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
01af Posted May 16, 2011 Share #2 Posted May 16, 2011 The general rule of thumb for lens buyers is this: Focal length is more important than lens speed. In particular, the difference between 1:2.8 and 1:3.8 is rather small. If 1:3.8 is not fast enough then 1:2.8 usually isn't either. I guess for your requirements, a 24 mm lens will be better than a 28 mm lens ... and then you may consider a used Elmarit-M 24 mm 1:2.8 Asph or a Zeiss Biogon 25 mm 1:2.8 ZM. Also consider the Zeiss Biogon 21 mm 1:4.5 ZM. Of course, it would be much easier to give good advice if one knew which lenses you already have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgk Posted May 16, 2011 Share #3 Posted May 16, 2011 Usually I would consider that both architectural exteriors and interiors would be shot on a tripod at smaller apertures - either lens would be suitable in this case although if you are primarily into architectural photography I'm not sure that an M is the best choice in all honesty. However, I'd be looking at the 24 if I was going to choose between these two for the scenario that you describe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmas Posted May 16, 2011 Share #4 Posted May 16, 2011 Hi I'd suggest a used CV 21mm, 25mm and 28mm cheapest in LTM, buy something slse with money left over like a tripod, or 15mm. Noel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted May 16, 2011 Share #5 Posted May 16, 2011 In general, as others have said, the speed is not very relevant. However, the focal length depends on the use. The 28 is certainly more versatile, but the 24 is a very interesting focal length. It can be used either as a "normal"wideangle, but with proper composition it can be used as a superwideangle as well. Personally I would go for the 24 and buy a Zeiss 28 to go with it, possibly at a later stage when funds permit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Washington Posted May 16, 2011 Share #6 Posted May 16, 2011 I can only say that my results with CV lenses have been very good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgray Posted May 16, 2011 Share #7 Posted May 16, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Focal length suggestions can be a bit personal sometimes, but for me, with the M8 crop, 28mm wouldn't be enough for what you are suggesting. I personally prefer either 21 or 28 for architecture type shots *without* a crop. While 28 can be a bit tight for some of these shots, I find it generally a more useful focal length than 21mm on full frame 35mm, so I'd go for that. With the M8 crop though, I'd personally look for something in the 18-21mm range. The Zeiss ZM 18/4, 21/2.8, and 21/4.5 are all great lenses. I've not heard as much about the Leica 18 - it might be great too. There are also options, new and used, at 21mm with Leica. I know I didn't comment on the two lenses you mentioned. If I had to pick on for what you are suggesting, I'd take the 24. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delander † Posted May 16, 2011 Share #8 Posted May 16, 2011 On the M8 I dont think the 28mm will be wide enough for your purposes and even the 24 may not be wide enough. It depends on your actual intended use, complete buildings, tower blocks, skyscrapers etc. If you are on a budget look at the WAs from Zeiss and CV as other have suggested but remember that they will not be coded, although a code for an equivalent Leica lens can be used in camera. If you are going to choose only from the two lenses you mention then I would go for the 24mm Elmar. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TshawM8 Posted May 16, 2011 Author Share #9 Posted May 16, 2011 Thanks you all very much for the suggestions. I should have been a little more clear, but these are more walk around street photos of the Oxford more than professional architecture shots, I have my canon gear for that. I do appreciate the suggestions and am now wondering whether I should just get a 28 elmarit and a zeiss 21mm or 18mm. Again thank you all for suggestions and input, I welcome more! Cheers, Thomas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted May 16, 2011 Share #10 Posted May 16, 2011 Pssst, don't let anyone else know, but the Voigtlander Skopar 25mm is all you need and it's an absolute bargain! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.