Prosophos Posted February 17, 2011 Share #61 Posted February 17, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Love this combo. Here are nearly 400 images that I have taken with the 50 noct f/0.95 on the M9: SET: Leica Noctilux 50 mm f/0.95 asph - a set on Flickr SLIDESHOW: Leica Noctilux 50 mm f/0.95 asph Those are superb Ashwin. You deserve this lens. Peter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 17, 2011 Posted February 17, 2011 Hi Prosophos, Take a look here M9 + Noctilux 1:0.95 / 50 mm. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
mongrelnomad Posted February 20, 2011 Share #62 Posted February 20, 2011 An insanely fantastic combination. At f0.95 At about f2.0 At about f5.6 At f16 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mongrelnomad Posted February 20, 2011 Share #63 Posted February 20, 2011 An insanely fantastic combination. At f0.95 At about f2.0 At about f5.6 At f16 Is there a reason my images are not showing up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swanny66 Posted February 20, 2011 Share #64 Posted February 20, 2011 I see what look like 'halos' around the boy's heads. Is that PP or the lens? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ho_co Posted February 21, 2011 Share #65 Posted February 21, 2011 Some wonderful shots there, guys! Really stellar! For more Noctilux stuff, see LFI 2/2011, which has an excellent feature comparing the f/1.0 and the f/0.95. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ho_co Posted February 21, 2011 Share #66 Posted February 21, 2011 Is there a reason my images are not showing up? Good save, Julian! I was wondering why you posted them twice, even if they are good. I see what look like 'halos' around the boys' heads. Is that PP or the lens? I can't speak for Julian, but lenses don't do that. They may be angels on a short-term visit, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraz Posted February 21, 2011 Share #67 Posted February 21, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Couple of examples at f0.95: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mongrelnomad Posted February 21, 2011 Share #68 Posted February 21, 2011 Good save, Julian! I was wondering why you posted them twice, even if they are good. I'm not joking - I really can't see them on my computer! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJP Posted February 21, 2011 Share #69 Posted February 21, 2011 I can see your images (2x), did you try a different browser? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
faraz Posted February 21, 2011 Share #70 Posted February 21, 2011 I'm not joking - I really can't see them on my computer! flickr is blocked? either by your broswer (by someone setting block images from this website) or at your firewall (workplace?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdtaylor Posted February 23, 2011 Share #71 Posted February 23, 2011 Stupid question time . Easily understand the amount of light gathering/reduction moving from f1.0 to f1.4 to f2.0 to f2.8 etc.- learned it 45 years ago! Just how much more light does 0.95 gather than 1.0. I imagine it is easy to figure, but it currently alludes my mind. Thanks, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lindolfi Posted February 23, 2011 Share #72 Posted February 23, 2011 (1/0,95)^2=1,11, So 11% more light. Thats only 1/9th stop. However the disks in your bokeh will be 5% larger which can be seen, in a direct comparison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 23, 2011 Share #73 Posted February 23, 2011 Couple of examples at f0.95: That second image has removed all my appetite to critique them.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lindolfi Posted February 24, 2011 Share #74 Posted February 24, 2011 (1/0,95)^2=1,11, So 11% more light. Thats only 1/9th stop. Sorry, made an estimation error. After calculating it, this appears to be: (1/0,95)^2=1,11, So 11% more light. Thats only 1/7th stop. But the message remains the same. If you choose 0.95 over 1.0 because of the sensitivity of your lens/sensor combination, it makes hardly any difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthury Posted March 2, 2011 Share #75 Posted March 2, 2011 I recalled posting some in this thread but I can't find them anymore ... but here are some of my contribution ... The first 2 are wide opened The next two were shot @ f/4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashkanani Posted March 2, 2011 Share #76 Posted March 2, 2011 a Kuwaiti young boy celebrating the 50th anniversary of Kuwait Independence. I hope that you like it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.