bill Posted July 26, 2010 Share #1 Posted July 26, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) The title of this thread may be lost on those who are not up on their Pratchett, so let me explain. The X1 has been around for a while now, and the initial euphoria has died down. I have looked at one a couple of times and I just can't warm to it. My question is to those who have bought one. Have you bought the sizzle or the sausage? Did you buy (into) the concept, or the end result? Discuss. Regards, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 26, 2010 Posted July 26, 2010 Hi bill, Take a look here Sell the sizzle not the sausage.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
h00ligan Posted July 26, 2010 Share #2 Posted July 26, 2010 end result - but not fully yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klassika Posted July 26, 2010 Share #3 Posted July 26, 2010 Well Bill, you can look again and again, but you have to work with the X1. You just can't compare it with other classes. Everyone tries to compare it with EP-2, G 11, NEX, D-Lux 4 etc. It's a standard of it's own. I like it very much, and yes it's slow, no problem for me. The quality of it's pictures is outstanding. Therefore I hope there will be a firmware update soon so it will become a bit faster. Leica has done well with this camera and I don't think it's overpriced. regards, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted July 26, 2010 Share #4 Posted July 26, 2010 I am still happy with my purchase. Outside of the slow autofocus and the weird manual focus mode, it has lived up to my expectations. The IQ is great, it is light in weight, the menus are minimal and well designed, all necessary functions have a dedicated button, and the shutter speed and aperture knobs make you feel like you are using a camera and not a "swiss army knife" style japanese camera. I completely bought into the concept, but over time the end result has been great and it truly is my take anywhere / everywhere camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym911 Posted July 26, 2010 Share #5 Posted July 26, 2010 sold mine......just missed pressing that shutter release and manually focussing a lens...sizzle or sausage?...not sure andy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caimi Posted July 26, 2010 Share #6 Posted July 26, 2010 It is a slow operating camera that produces consistently excellent images. Of course I wish the AF and processing time was faster but the images make it worthwhile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferry Zievinger Posted July 26, 2010 Share #7 Posted July 26, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Well Bill, you can look again and again, but you have to work with the X1. You just can't compare it with other classes. Everyone tries to compare it with EP-2, G 11, NEX, D-Lux 4 etc. It's a standard of it's own. I like it very much, and yes it's slow, no problem for me.The quality of it's pictures is outstanding. Therefore I hope there will be a firmware update soon so it will become a bit faster. Leica has done well with this camera and I don't think it's overpriced. regards, Bill, I agree with Klassika, using the camera now for about a month it has given me excellent results. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmteno76 Posted July 26, 2010 Share #8 Posted July 26, 2010 Not sure about the metaphor, but it is great tool to have in my collection of cameras. it is the camera that I carry with me everywhere. However, my style of photography fits very well with the well known limitations of of the X! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravinj Posted July 26, 2010 Share #9 Posted July 26, 2010 When Mac OS X came out, Steve Jobs remarked that "One of the design goals [for the interface] was when you saw it you wanted to lick it." My Leica X1 produces images so beautiful that you want to lick them. I have sold my DSLR kit. When I see people going around with a big DSLR hanging around their necks, I feel pity for them. IQ is what matters and the X1 has delivered highest quality in the smallest package on the planet today. For me it was the concept [small package, high IQ] and the end result [high IQ]. Everything else is secondary, including sizzling sausages. I would pay $3000 for an "X2" if Leica can come up with these features in same or smaller body: F2.0 lens, a 3x zoom and optical stabilization, a bit faster AF and a better LCD. For now X1 rules. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanCderidder Posted July 27, 2010 Share #10 Posted July 27, 2010 Any buyer having paid some attention to the Internet info sources would know exactly what he/she was getting into with the purchase of an X1, as did I. I bought the sausage, and the sausage looks exactly what expected the sausage to be .... a sausage, a very nice tasty sausage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen.w Posted July 27, 2010 Share #11 Posted July 27, 2010 I've had mine since the beginning of March. I've thought about selling it and still might, but I have taken it on three holidays (just got back from the last today) and it is a great travel camera - small and light without compromising on image quality. I also like the discipline that shooting with a single focal length forces on me. However, the one thing I would dearly like in a firmware update is a better manual focusing scale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest badbob Posted July 27, 2010 Share #12 Posted July 27, 2010 Steve Huff says he finally sold some stuff he didn't need and bought the X1. Now that's a recommendation if I ever heard one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted July 27, 2010 Share #13 Posted July 27, 2010 Steve Huff says he finally sold some stuff he didn't need and bought the X1. Now that's a recommendation if I ever heard one. While I don't think he's special or anything, what is suprising is that he decided he wanted one after saying he didn't in his review. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiILX1 Posted July 27, 2010 Share #14 Posted July 27, 2010 Steve Huff says he finally sold some stuff he didn't need and bought the X1. Now that's a recommendation if I ever heard one. Yeah Steve Huff's analysis of the X1 is great and so are his follow up articles. To answer the original post- I got the X1 for the sizzle (concept) thinking I would have to put up with and sacrifice a few things every day with the sausage (end product). Not the case. The negative are WAY overblown. The X1 is top tier and second to none for what it is. It really is in it's own class. To say what we already know, but for reconsideration- it's a DSLR sensor- in a compact camera's body - that feels like a Leica M with the simplicity of the interaction & build quality- and produces Leica M images. In that sense, it's the most eclectic product I have ever owned. It has the best of everything. Some say the AF is slow but I don't notice it when you set the right settings. It's a non-issue. Besides, if it could be faster but sacrifice image like other cameras I would prefer it the way it is. The images are STUNNING. These shots are from my first day with it and I'm just an amateur learning. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/127072-sell-the-sizzle-not-the-sausage/?do=findComment&comment=1389716'>More sharing options...
NZDavid Posted July 28, 2010 Share #15 Posted July 28, 2010 I definitely haven't got taken in by the sizzle. Where's the pork? Good images, yes, as good as a DSLR. Nice compact size, nice simple controls are tasty, but it's not the fastest sausage on the barbie nor the easiest to grill, and it comes in only one flavor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
prk60091 Posted July 28, 2010 Share #16 Posted July 28, 2010 . . . Some say the AF is slow but I don't notice it when you set the right settings. It's a non-issue. Besides, if it could be faster but sacrifice image like other cameras I would prefer it the way it is. The images are STUNNING. These shots are from my first day with it and I'm just an amateur learning. the attached images are STUNNING. what are the "right settings"? my beautiful gorgeous wife gifted me an x1 yesterday.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiILX1 Posted July 28, 2010 Share #17 Posted July 28, 2010 the attached images are STUNNING. what are the "right settings"? my beautiful gorgeous wife gifted me an x1 yesterday.... Thanks! And congratulations! I use spot or 1 point H focus with a Voigtländer optical viewfinder and the screen turned off. I also have it on AF not AF + Macro to save time. Anything that requires faster focusing I just prefocus with af or manual focus. My DSLR focuses faster but what's the point when it misses too? The X1 never misses. I find the focus speed a non-issue and I have been shooting with it for 4 days on the fast streets of Chicago. Like I said I think the negativity on the X1 has been grossly overdone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
prk60091 Posted July 28, 2010 Share #18 Posted July 28, 2010 Thanks! And congratulations! I use spot or 1 point H focus with a Voigtländer optical viewfinder and the screen turned off. I also have it on AF not AF + Macro to save time. Anything that requires faster focusing I just prefocus with af or manual focus. My DSLR focuses faster but what's the point when it misses too? The X1 never misses. I find the focus speed a non-issue and I have been shooting with it for 4 days on the fast streets of Chicago. Like I said I think the negativity on the X1 has been grossly overdone. thanks for the info i'll be looking for you on the "fast streets of Chicago"- I'm a northsider. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
F1Addict Posted July 29, 2010 Share #19 Posted July 29, 2010 Thanks! And congratulations! I use spot or 1 point H focus with a Voigtländer optical viewfinder and the screen turned off. I also have it on AF not AF + Macro to save time. Anything that requires faster focusing I just prefocus with af or manual focus. My DSLR focuses faster but what's the point when it misses too? The X1 never misses. I find the focus speed a non-issue and I have been shooting with it for 4 days on the fast streets of Chicago. Like I said I think the negativity on the X1 has been grossly overdone. I use 1 point focusing also, but have been under the impression that it's more difficult with the viewfinder because the focusing point doesn't show up in the viewfinder. How are you finding it regarding this issue? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiILX1 Posted July 29, 2010 Share #20 Posted July 29, 2010 I use 1 point focusing also, but have been under the impression that it's more difficult with the viewfinder because the focusing point doesn't show up in the viewfinder. How are you finding it regarding this issue? I have the Voigtländer brightline 35mm viewfinder. 9/10 times center is center and by now I think I've eliminated the 10th time as well. The 1point h is more forgiving than the spot focus for sure. Anyway- play with close up, mid distance, and far away shots and figure out where center is on your viewfinder as compared with your camera. Since the are centrally aligned it will be damn close. Essentially the only variable is your eye's angle looking into the viewfinder in landscape and portrait- so once you figure out the right way of looking into it, you will naturally pull the camera up to that position after a little repetition, and your framing and center focus will be accurate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.