jaques Posted June 3, 2010 Share #21 Posted June 3, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) recently I flew to Bangkok with an M6 carefully packed in an artisan and artist bag- inside another padded bag. However all this was loaded as checked baggage and must have received a big bang somewhere... When I took the camera out at the hotel the RF refused to focus on infinity and was way out... very annoying. took a few shots by focusing off the lens scale... when I got back to Australia I adjusted the RF myself with a jewelers driver... now it is perfect again and touch wood will stay that way. not encouraging I know... so I will say that I have done the same with my M9 on several flight and the RF has stayed put. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 3, 2010 Posted June 3, 2010 Hi jaques, Take a look here Vibration and M9 Durability. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jklotz Posted June 3, 2010 Author Share #22 Posted June 3, 2010 Thank you for the replies. I appreciate all the input. One thing that occurred to me: A bike is going to vibrate a lot more than being on a plane, and 2K miles should be around 40 hours on the bike when all is said and done. I don't know that the comparison is valid. Judging by what I've heard, I am going to go on the assumption that if I take it, it will need a "tune up" when I get back. Therefore, my decision will have to be a) shoot with my favorite camera on my trip and send it to be realigned when I return, or take another lesser camera and live with it. Tough call. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
canlogic Posted June 3, 2010 Share #23 Posted June 3, 2010 I have travelled all over on my HD Deuce and have taken my M8 and M9 in the hard saddlebags all the time. Obviously some padding under camera and lenses. Never had a problem doing this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jager Posted June 3, 2010 Share #24 Posted June 3, 2010 Thank you for the replies. I appreciate all the input. One thing that occurred to me: A bike is going to vibrate a lot more than being on a plane, and 2K miles should be around 40 hours on the bike when all is said and done. I don't know that the comparison is valid. Judging by what I've heard, I am going to go on the assumption that if I take it, it will need a "tune up" when I get back. Therefore, my decision will have to be a) shoot with my favorite camera on my trip and send it to be realigned when I return, or take another lesser camera and live with it. Tough call. I'm not sure that's the conclusion I'd draw, James. I'd expect an aircraft fuselage to generate far more vibration than the typical motorcycle (and assuming you carry your camera in a bag in the overhead compartments, that's what you need to consider - not the amount of vibration coming through your seat). In any case, vibration induced damage is unlikely to manifest itself quickly, but is far more likely to emerge over time, after many trips (on an airplane) or many miles (on a motorcycle). It is highly improbable that a single trip would exhibit any problems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted June 3, 2010 Share #25 Posted June 3, 2010 If you transport your M9 in 25 year old Cessnas and the like, I can assure you that the vibration is considerable - to put it mildly... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
richfx Posted June 4, 2010 Share #26 Posted June 4, 2010 Planning a 6,000 km on / off road motorcycle trip to Chile and Argentina in January on BMW R1200GSs and plan to take the M9 and my glass. They'll likely ride in the hard bags with some extra egg crate foam or the like. Time will tell, but I'd rather deal with a RF adjustment afterwards than not use this gear during such a trip. Rich Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
diogenis Posted June 4, 2010 Share #27 Posted June 4, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) If you transport your M9 in 25 year old Cessnas and the like, I can assure you that the vibration is considerable - to put it mildly... Yes, but a motorcycles vibrations are nowhere near a Cessna's. In short, if what you ride, doesn't drop your teeth fillings, then that RF should be fine. But riding a Cessna, then it is risky. And I doubt there is anything that can be done against this. Maybe asking Leica service would be a nice idea too. They should know better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted June 4, 2010 Share #28 Posted June 4, 2010 Padded case worn diagonally or backpack. Works fine on my Vespa anyway... http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/film-forum/119226-just-bought-mp-anthracite-try-film-2.html#post1310407 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samir Jahjah Posted June 5, 2010 Share #29 Posted June 5, 2010 http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/film-forum/119226-just-bought-mp-anthracite-try-film-2.html#post1310407 A small Pelican case would do the trick: now whether on a plane, or 4x4 on dirt road in central africa, my M9s sit quietly in Pelican cases. That did not prevent one of my M9 to do a 2 meter high free fall on rocks: well, the camera had no a single dent, the lens was not damaged at all, and everything was working fine. Let's not forget these cameras are rock solid and can withstand heavy shocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
diogenis Posted June 5, 2010 Share #30 Posted June 5, 2010 They are rock solid yes, but their RF mechanism relies in accuracy and then it depends in luck if, falling from 2m high your camera won't need a recalibration. Mine needed. It's all a matter of G's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jklotz Posted June 11, 2010 Author Share #31 Posted June 11, 2010 I'm back. 2K miles of all kinds of roads. RF appears to be out for close focusing. Damn damn damn. Looks like another trip to Leica for it..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.