Jump to content

Hobby vs. Pro


Guest ccmsosse

Recommended Posts

Guest ccmsosse

Advertisement (gone after registration)

How many forum members are true amateurs or hobbyists, as I am?

I read a lot of interesting posts on the M9 and Leica film site, but many are truly by pros..

So I am wondering who many readers and contributers here are pure amateurs, use Leica stuff and film bodies for "pleasure" only (and I am not saying that pros can't have "pleasure" when using Leica film bodies). I am just trying to get a feeling how many contributers here are still just hobbyists ... and are willing to spend $$$ for Leica bodies and lenes (am I all alone?).

 

Cheers

 

PS: I am using a M9, M6, M7, MP and am questioning my sanity... :mad: Maybe I should sell my M6?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Semi-pro ain't bad, where you've got the chance to publish pictures and make some money out of them occasionally, but don't depend on doing so for a living. Forking out for camera gear is just as crazy as spending money on cars, motorbikes, hi-fi gear, watches....Enjoy it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Gentleman Amateur", just like my signature says. I make a few bob along the way, which pays for a G&T or two and the odd weekend break, on which of course I take more photos... :D It's a pastime, and I really don't take it too seriously; there are far too many other people who do, and who suffer extreme sense of humour failure all too often as a result. I decided long ago not to go pro - it's too much like hard work and I didn't want to conflate work and pleasure.

 

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael, I am an amateur and I don't own a digital camera. I decided to wait and wait longer, and now I find the M9 too expensive (lost money in the crisis) and besides that, I enjoy using a bunch of M-bodies and lenses. The M-3 came first, then an M-6TTL and then several more. Recently I found a very good lab to have my color and black & white negative films and slide films developed and scanned on CD. Second-hand material can still be wonderful and I hope to continue this way for quite a while.

Lex

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must confess to being a "professional". Now the only difference between the two is the pro gets paid for his/her efforts while the non-pro does it for his/her own pleasure and enjoyment. Although I have been photographing for the past 40 odd years most would be considered 'pro'. For the past 7 years since I retired, I have shot nothing but editorial work, and got paid. The invoice along with my agent's check always describes the work as "professional services". Does that help answer that question lots of photographers have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amateur with a few outings into pro land

Did learn photography from a Pro, did a few weddings and commercial shootings (portrait mostly), but never got the hang of it and stopped to accept paid shootings. The investment in gear and the trouble with getting competent secondary photographers...oh my.

 

Sold everything I needed for the pro jobs, use Leica M8 now, shot a wedding as a tertiary shooter last weekend, and I am happy now. No money, but also no stress. Have enough of that during my day job ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopeless amateur..but gain a lot of pleasure from being one:D

Spend many hours per week on photography, either reading books, taking pictures,on this forum or just thinking about it.

 

best

andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I once had pro aspirations but am glad I stayed amateur. For me this practice requires effortless effort, which goals and deadlines would likely undermine. Free and easy wandering suits me best.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...