Double Negative Posted January 28, 2012 Share #201 Posted January 28, 2012 Advertisement (gone after registration) ^ Ha! I think any single light over a machine is a bad idea, but yeah - a fluor. tube would be a spectacular accident waiting to happen, especially over something like a lathe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 28, 2012 Posted January 28, 2012 Hi Double Negative, Take a look here Noctilux: Why do you love it, or why not?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
algrove Posted January 28, 2012 Share #202 Posted January 28, 2012 I love the Noctilux because I think its colors are nicer and more realistic than those of the Summilux. Below are two photos, the first of them taken with the Noctilux, the second taken with the Summilux. White Balance is identical. Which look do you prefer? I like the one where the subject is OK with her picture being taken-the second-the lens come does come into the equation for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryharwood Posted January 28, 2012 Share #203 Posted January 28, 2012 I had the monster for 10 plus years; I used it occasionally, mostly in the South of France where it excelled, but never in the UK much. It was heavy, and difficult to nail the focus. I didn't regret it when I sold it, and still don't. Unless you have specific usage for this lens, then it is not worth the outlay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosophos Posted January 29, 2012 Share #204 Posted January 29, 2012 The biggest issue I have with all of the Noctilux lenses (I've owned and used both the last f/1.0 version, and the current f/0.95 version) is the minimum focus distance of 1m. I find it quite limiting, at least for my type of shooting. Perhaps the new SLR Magic lens will be worth considering. IMHO the minimum focus distance of this lens is the best thing about it. On a pleasant note, I've been quite surprised by the new Leica 35/1.4 FLE.. it's incredible (and much smaller to carry) and... focuses down to 0.7 m! Peter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted January 29, 2012 Share #205 Posted January 29, 2012 (edited) The biggest issue I have with all of the Noctilux lenses (I've owned and used both the last f/1.0 version, and the current f/0.95 version) is the minimum focus distance of 1m. I find it quite limiting, at least for my type of shooting. Perhaps the new SLR Magic lens will be worth considering. IMHO the minimum focus distance of this lens is the best thing about it. On a pleasant note, I've been quite surprised by the new Leica 35/1.4 FLE.. it's incredible (and much smaller to carry) and... focuses down to 0.7 m! Peter. So the image size between the two are close enough to make little difference. No? 35/50 == ? Edited January 29, 2012 by pico Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosophos Posted January 29, 2012 Share #206 Posted January 29, 2012 So the image size between the two are close enough to make little difference. No?35/50 == ? It's all about perspective, and the differences the two lenses confer. I'm not talking about using them in similar situations... Surely you understand? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenInTime Posted January 29, 2012 Share #207 Posted January 29, 2012 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) The biggest issue I have with all of the Noctilux lenses (I've owned and used both the last f/1.0 version, and the current f/0.95 version) is the minimum focus distance of 1m. I find it quite limiting, at least for my type of shooting. Perhaps the new SLR Magic lens will be worth considering. IMHO the minimum focus distance of this lens is the best thing about it. There are f/0.95 70cm vs 1m comparison shots here: http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2012/01/28/the-slr-magic-50-t0-95-in-the-studio-noctilux-vs-hyperprime/ Getting the zone of sharpness in just the right place on any animate object is going to be even more of a challenge at 70cm than 1m. At these distances, even moving from the 35mm to the 50mm Summilux gives me to a significant fall in hit rate. Edited January 29, 2012 by FrozenInTime Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Messsucherkamera Posted January 31, 2012 Share #208 Posted January 31, 2012 Normally I'm using the Noctilux for portraits, but I had to remind myself why I do love this lens. This is a mediocre shot, granted - but by using the Nocti, it does take on an almost ethereal feel.I was just about to sell this lens yesterday - had 2 buyers interested - 1 fell through and I decided to stay in the Nocti world for a bit longer. M9, Noctilux @ 1.0 My God, man! Don't do it!! Have you gone mad?!?!?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
photoart Posted February 2, 2012 Share #209 Posted February 2, 2012 I like the noctilux, because I can separate the object from the background perfectly even with full body shoots. Picture 1-9 taken at f.95 with ND8 grayfilter under bright conditions For me, it isn´t difficult to use, I can focus better and more accurate with the nocti than with the Summilux because of its big size and smooth focus machanic. It´s not my choice for everyday, but it is perfect for full body isolation and low light situations. I like the special 3d look of the images at f0.95 The limited focus distance of 1m is no problem for my shooting style. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surge Posted March 26, 2017 Share #210 Posted March 26, 2017 Took this in my first hour of owning the 0.95. I took it while walking, at 1/180. It is not hard to focus. This was using the optical finder on the M240. https://www.flickr.com/gp/28294768@N05/67spN9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OR120 Posted March 29, 2017 Share #211 Posted March 29, 2017 Loved the lens. Owned one once. Borrowed one once for a shoot. Was shooting a story on an adult child moving into a group home. Spent time with the family the last week they were together. For me it only works on non moving objects in very controlled situations or fixed objects. It's very heavy and to me that alone defeats the whole purpose of the M system. Really a one trick pony. But a very beautiful pony. I really like to shoot and go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Posted March 29, 2017 Share #212 Posted March 29, 2017 (edited) Great thread. I have/had been vacillating on whether or not to take the plunge and purchase a Noctilux. I knew/know that it is a lens that is virtually beyond comparison when it comes to the magic of low light, Leica photography. My only problem with the idea of owning one was size and weight of the thing. One day, while browsing used lenses in my favorite camera shop I noticed an example of the voigtlander 35mm 1.2 lens. It, too, is a large fast lens. I purchased it with the idea that it would give me a perfect opportunity to see if the size and weight of Noctilux would be justified by to magic of a super-fast lens. I would never claim that the VC lens compares to Noctilux, but it is a good lens. Use of it made it apparent, for me, the size and weight thing was something I did not want to deal with. I still have that 35 1.2, but use it on only very rare occasions. Edited March 29, 2017 by Wayne Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herr Barnack Posted May 20, 2017 Share #213 Posted May 20, 2017 I have the Noctilux M 50/1.0 (#11822). There is a saying - "never say never," so instead I will say this: I cannot ever imagine myself letting this lens get away. I cannot speak for the capabilities or image quality of the 0.95 Noctilux ASPH, but the #11822 Noctilux is almost magical in the way it renders at f/1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppyman Posted May 21, 2017 Share #214 Posted May 21, 2017 (edited) For my 2 cents, I don't have or need a Noctilux. I seldom use the fastest apertures in my photography and I actually think that the very shallow DOF looks a little un-natural for my personal taste. I have walked around shooting on the street for a day and spent a day in studio using the 0.95 and it behaved impeccably. Stopped down it just looked like my Summilux asph in any case. For me like the Summilux wides it is just bigger snd heavier than I like to carry and use with an M. Of course if you need/ like that maximum aperture then there is no substitute. I would guess that I am a minority opinion in this! Edited May 21, 2017 by hoppyman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phongph Posted May 31, 2020 Share #215 Posted May 31, 2020 It is a really interesting topic! Have a nice weekend! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted June 1, 2020 Share #216 Posted June 1, 2020 On 5/31/2020 at 5:08 AM, phongph said: It is a really interesting topic! Must be, given that it was started 10 years ago. Jeff 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.noctilux Posted September 3, 2020 Share #217 Posted September 3, 2020 No more comment since June ? No new happy/unhappy user of Noctilux ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 3, 2020 Share #218 Posted September 3, 2020 32 minutes ago, a.noctilux said: No more comment since June ? No new happy/unhappy user of Noctilux ? One comment in the last 3 years, not counting yours and mine. Better protect your namesake. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdg1371 Posted September 3, 2020 Share #219 Posted September 3, 2020 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/120755-noctilux-why-do-you-love-it-or-why-not/?do=findComment&comment=4039409'>More sharing options...
adan Posted September 4, 2020 Share #220 Posted September 4, 2020 I'm glad Leica gets bragging rights and income from the various versions of the Noctilux, but the reasons I don't love it are: 1) 50mm just is not my focal length, generally. Hasn't been since ~1980 (except for a brief period with a Summicron on the M8, as an effective "70mm"). 2) 50mm with a minimum focus of 1m is really not my focal length - gotta be able to get at least "chin to forehead" framing for horizontal portraits. 3) Weight and size - not horrible, but I'd rather put my "bag weight budget" into carrying a 75, 90, or 135mm. 4) Cost - the only thing sillier than using a lens that is not right for me - is paying a 4/5-figure fee to use a lens that is not right for me. Too bad I won't be around in 2100 - it would be interesting to see how many Noctilux pictures have made it into the permanent human archive of "great photographs" by then. I suspect five fingers will be more than enough to count them. Could be wrong, of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now