Clandrel Posted March 7, 2010 Share #21  Posted March 7, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Here's one taken just before darkness.. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/114332-leica-x1-is-the-camera-ive-been-waiting-for/?do=findComment&comment=1250872'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 7, 2010 Posted March 7, 2010 Hi Clandrel, Take a look here Leica X1 is the camera I've been waiting for. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
pappde Posted March 8, 2010 Share #22  Posted March 8, 2010 I always felt Leica cameras epitomized for me what a camera should be. I own a CL a Digilux 2 a D-Lux 4 and now I have the X1. I love its simplicity. It is a photo camera and NOTHING else. It only takes pictures and that 's it. It makes me to go out and take more and more pictures. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/114332-leica-x1-is-the-camera-ive-been-waiting-for/?do=findComment&comment=1251428'>More sharing options...
wilfredo Posted March 14, 2010 Share #23  Posted March 14, 2010 Another photograph for you  Excellent detail. I look forward to seeing what it can produce in the B&W arena. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilfredo Posted March 16, 2010 Share #24  Posted March 16, 2010 I've continued to surf through the various photos on the X1 forum and except for this one, I haven't been impressed by the sharpness or detail in the images. The micro-contrast the lens on the camera produces is not very impressive. The images are akin to my former Canon 5D images taken with my former 24-105mm Canon "L" lens. Not bad at all, but they lack punch. The M8 files and D2 files IMHO offer more of a signature Leica stamp than does the X1. I will keep my eye on future images but in all honesty, regardless of price, this is not a camera I am drawn to. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/114332-leica-x1-is-the-camera-ive-been-waiting-for/?do=findComment&comment=1261653'>More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted March 16, 2010 Share #25 Â Posted March 16, 2010 Wilfredo, maybe your expectations are too high? You are comparing the X1 to and M8 and 5D... much larger cameras that can use a bunch of different lenses to get their look. With regards to the D2, I think that is a fairer assessment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hythe Posted March 16, 2010 Share #26 Â Posted March 16, 2010 What's the one in the middle with the brown leatherette? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clandrel Posted March 16, 2010 Share #27  Posted March 16, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Another one... Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/114332-leica-x1-is-the-camera-ive-been-waiting-for/?do=findComment&comment=1262387'>More sharing options...
Ecaton Posted March 17, 2010 Share #28 Â Posted March 17, 2010 Wilfredo, maybe your expectations are too high? You are comparing the X1 to and M8 and 5D... much larger cameras that can use a bunch of different lenses to get their look. With regards to the D2, I think that is a fairer assessment. Â I'm with Wifredo here. From all the X1 pictures I have seen, it's just another camera with a really good sensor and a decent lens. Granted, there are not to many yet, in compact form and the X1 wins the beauty contest hands down. But unlike with the M8, M9 or a Sigma DP in its comfort zone, there is no "wow" effect with its pictures. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted March 17, 2010 Share #29 Â Posted March 17, 2010 From all the X1 pictures I have seen, it's just another camera with a really good sensor and a decent lens. Granted, there are not to many yet, in compact form . Â Enough said... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggurat Posted March 17, 2010 Share #30 Â Posted March 17, 2010 Is it that it has a CMOS rather than a CCD look? Â I think the CCD cameras (Dig 1, Dig 2, M8 etc) seem to transform the original scene more and make more of a 'picture'. I have always found the same thing with the Digilux 3, it's sort of blisteringly neutral which happens to have been very useful for the use I put it to. However, if I want to make pictures I still use the Dig 1 for instance. Â Regards Johnny Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterb Posted March 17, 2010 Share #31 Â Posted March 17, 2010 Wilfredo, maybe your expectations are too high? You are comparing the X1 to and M8 and 5D... much larger cameras that can use a bunch of different lenses to get their look. With regards to the D2, I think that is a fairer assessment. Â I respectfully disagree. The M8 and the older 5D )with the APS-C sensor) may be larger (and may have more bells and whistles) but they are both basically cameras that couple great optics with an APS-C sized sensor, conceptually no different than the X1. Â The point of the X1 is that you DON'T need a larger camera to get great results if you combine a superb lens and sensor together in a smallish body. The D2 is not a fair comparison in that that camera coupled a superb lens with an ordinary small sensor (although pretty good in its day I suppose) and made the best of it. Â So at $2000 a pop Wilfredos' expectations are not high at all. Â You can't have things both ways. Â P.S. Perhaps Wilfredo should look at the images that Jim Radcliffe made with the X1 in his review of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsrockit Posted March 17, 2010 Share #32 Â Posted March 17, 2010 PB, I guess you're right, but I don't think any of them are fair assessments really. I was just thinking Leica to Leica made more sense than big Canon to small Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryliem Posted March 20, 2010 Author Share #33  Posted March 20, 2010 I've continued to surf through the various photos on the X1 forum and except for this one, I haven't been impressed by the sharpness or detail in the images. The micro-contrast the lens on the camera produces is not very impressive. The images are akin to my former Canon 5D images taken with my former 24-105mm Canon "L" lens. Not bad at all, but they lack punch. The M8 files and D2 files IMHO offer more of a signature Leica stamp than does the X1. I will keep my eye on future images but in all honesty, regardless of price, this is not a camera I am drawn to.  How about these two? Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/114332-leica-x1-is-the-camera-ive-been-waiting-for/?do=findComment&comment=1266498'>More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted March 20, 2010 Share #34 Â Posted March 20, 2010 The toy mouse said wow!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HellDriver Posted March 20, 2010 Share #35  Posted March 20, 2010 I´m very impressed. The X1 is a great toy.   ISO 3200 f/2.8 1/2s   ISO 3200 f/2.8 1/13s   ISO 1600 f/2.8 1/40s  Tonight in Zermatt / Switzerland. OOC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan States Posted March 20, 2010 Share #36 Â Posted March 20, 2010 I'm with Wifredo here. From all the X1 pictures I have seen, it's just another camera with a really good sensor and a decent lens. Granted, there are not to many yet, in compact form and the X1 wins the beauty contest hands down. But unlike with the M8, M9 or a Sigma DP in its comfort zone, there is no "wow" effect with its pictures. Â Â It certainly has the highest image quality POTENTIAL of any compact camera ever....as to wether the first few dozen owners who managed to post images on the intranet over the past 45 days can use it to it's full potential, well, that's another story. Many Leica owners, especially the "early adopters", are gearheads first, photographers second. If you need pictures of brick walls and dinner from last night out they are aces. For brilliant examples of a cameras artistic potential you will have to wait a while. Â The first 3 months after the M8 was on the market the net was clogged with pictures of desk lamps and bored wives and children. It took time for the serious shooters to get on the bandwagon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryliem Posted March 25, 2010 Author Share #37 Â Posted March 25, 2010 some photographs on flickr: Leica X1 - a set on Flickr enjoy... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
purduealum91 Posted March 25, 2010 Share #38  Posted March 25, 2010 Some of my X1 photos:  MobileMe Gallery  Enjoy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
h00ligan Posted March 25, 2010 Share #39 Â Posted March 25, 2010 I think at some point the question as to how results were obtained has to be asked. It appears to me there is a certain trend in post production within the leica community. The above photo of the gentleman seems to be straight out of the cam, without manipulation commonly seen in some prominent leica users (desaturation / selective grey adjustment layer/etc) Â I need to have a look around more but I am really curious as to images from an m8/9 and x1 side by side, with extremely limited post work. It's hard to tell if the glow is intrinsic, or manufactured at this point for me (my own shortcoming to be sure). I appreciate the styles we see, and understand and appreciate that making a good photograph is about post work as well, as well as artistic interpretation of the scene - but would like to see what those not spending much time in post are coming up with in a side by side comparison. Â Just some thoughts. Â example - purduealum91 - what was done to this fence image. I really like it - it has a certain look to it that suggests leica to me, but you may be great at pp. http://gallery.me.com/purduealum91#100266/L1000160&bgcolor=black - care to share the untouched version with us? Or if that is relatively untouched - that may answer some questions I personally have about the 'leicaness' of the x1 Â Just to add, the camera does look like it shoots very sharp - and captures good resolution etc - that's not a question in my mind. It is also remarkable that a pocket cam can get so much detail. That said - there are others in the class at far less expense that can do the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.