Jump to content

35 summicron for lowlight?


thinkfloyd

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The various replies has made me think about keeping the Canon. But then, it would take me several months to save up for the summicron. No rush really except that the widest I have is the 50 and I find myself wanting to shoot wider. I guess I should just stick with what I have in the meantime and wait til I have enough funds for the 35. Will be shooting a wedding this weekend and will be using the Canon + M8 for portraits, with the DSLR for wide shots. Thanks for the replies guys.

 

The wait continues...

 

You can wait with the cheap and yet excellent 2.5/35 CV Skopar (or the Nokton 1.4/40)... If you resell it to buy the summicron you will loose maybe 100$, but you will have shot hundreds of beautiful pictures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wel I have had the Summicron asph for years and it has not shifted focus once....It may be it has some shift in theory, after all it shares the design with the Summilux 35 asph, but it should be so minor that it can only be seen on an optical bench.

 

My 35 Summicron asph shifts focus at f4 and f5.6, but is fine at all other apertures. This is exactly consistent with Sean Reid's review of the lens he tested.

 

I carefully tested mine on a tripod, so I know its behavior; but, in practice, it presents no problem.

 

Out of curiosity, I tested my 28 Summicron asph and 50 Summilux asph the same way...no focus shift.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

jaapv, what lens do you find mounted on your M9 most of the time these days? I'd love to hear the long version of the story.
Summilux 50 asph followed by Summilux 24. I find those two absolutely amazing lenses and I tend to use them both at 1.4 as long as light permits. I must get a couple of ND filters. I recently bought an Elmarit 28 3rd version and it is an exceedingly good lens, nice for general landscape @ 5.6. The Summicron 35 asph has been pushed to the background a bit by this trio I confess, but remains a wonderfully drawing lens. The long end is another story...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Summilux 50 asph followed by Summilux 24. I find those two absolutely amazing lenses and I tend to use them both at 1.4 as long as light permits. I must get a couple of ND filters.

 

Jaap, this is probably a stupid question but how do you fit a ND filter to a Summilux 24??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, I am considering getting a 35 summicron v4 for my M8. My question, will it be good enough for indoor lowlight shots? I have a Canon 50/1.2 which I use for lowlight, but in order to fund the summicron, I'd need to sell the Canon. Is it worth it to lose the extra stops an f/1.2 lens gives for an excellent lens like the 35 summicron?

 

Below is how I shoot at dark (.045secs, 1.2, iso 2500, ev -1)

4367277478_83b7a55c30.jpg

 

Can a summicron do this? Or should I just save up the next 10 months for it and keep the 50/1.2?

 

ps: the reason why I am in such a hurry to I know that if I do, I will always dream of the summicron, and I'll end up spending more.

 

If you don't mind the bulk, have a look at the CV 35mm f1.2, an excellent lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does the CV 35 1.4 Nokton fair in comparison to the Leica 35 Lux pre ASPH, 35 Lux ASPH and 35 Cron ASPH?

 

I might be interested, to pick one of these up, as they seem, to be veeery compact (similar to the old Lux) and quite affordable as a second 35mm lens.

 

My biggest gripes about the 35 Cron ASPH is indeed certain flare and speed (why I would not recommend it for low light and moving subjects). The 35 f1.2 Nokton seems too bulky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no experience of the MC sorry. The CV 35/1.4 SC is a kind of modern pre-asph Lux with more sharpness at f/1.4 and f/2, the same kind of fingerprint as the latter (w/o glow though) but definitely more flare compared to the latest pre-asph Lux and some disturbing focus shift from f/2.8 and on. I use mine indoor with pleasure at f/1.4 and f/2 but i don't shoot against the light.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My 35/1.4 Nokton is MC and with the hood on, flare isn't really that much of a problem. I will say that I'm on my second copy, as the first one I had backfocused terribly. My current copy is spot-on and if it focus-shifts, it's not enough for me to notice. Remember though, I'm not a lens reviewer, I'm just a photographer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...