Tony Smith Posted December 1, 2010 Share #1 Â Posted December 1, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Can anyone give me information on the practical performance of this lens please? Â Thanks Tony Smith Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 1, 2010 Posted December 1, 2010 Hi Tony Smith, Take a look here 35mm Summilux R lens. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
masjah Posted December 1, 2010 Share #2 Â Posted December 1, 2010 It's a very good performer overall. Wide open, it vignettes a bit, but that's not really a problem in the sort of contexts in which f/1.4 needs to be used. In my book, it's also not quite top notch in the outer field at maximum aperture, but fine when stopped down a bit. Again this isn't really a problem in the sort of contexts where f/1.4 needs to be used. It's also quite big and heavy, being a retrofocus large aperture design. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandokan Posted December 7, 2010 Share #3 Â Posted December 7, 2010 I have been told that the R-35 Summicron is a sharper lens, but I have the Summilux and am very happy with it on the DMR. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsh Posted December 8, 2010 Share #4 Â Posted December 8, 2010 I love the 35 Summilux R. I personally like the Image quality better that the 35 Summillux M ASPH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brt Posted December 9, 2010 Share #5 Â Posted December 9, 2010 A special lens. It is big and heavy. It is not a walk around lens. It is rather difficult to focus and possibly you will miss the decisive moment. I like the look on film. Creamy colors and a soft transition from sharpness to unsharpness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted December 9, 2010 Share #6 Â Posted December 9, 2010 It is a decent lens, but not in the league of the APO lenses or the last 50 1.4. Â It is a 1980`s lens quality image. Not modern Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posto 6 Posted November 11, 2011 Share #7 Â Posted November 11, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Does anyone know if (as was the case with the late-version 80 Lux) there is any difference in the coatings between the earlier ELW versions and the later Solms ones? Â I have recently exchanged my 1983 Summilux-R 80mm for a very late version, and find that I much prefer the results, even for portraiture. Â I agree that the 35 R Lux is a very highly underrated lens, and also surprisingly rare. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted November 12, 2011 Share #8 Â Posted November 12, 2011 There should not be a visible difference between those eighties. I guess your first example was not up to spec. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandetech Posted March 17, 2013 Share #9 Â Posted March 17, 2013 I have been told that the R-35 Summicron is a sharper lens, but I have the Summilux and am very happy with it on the DMR. Â No, 35 lux at f/1.4 is definitely as sharp as 35 crom f/2.0 if not sharper at center field, I have both lens, and always doing AB testing. This is definitely a top notch lens, the sharpness will scare you, I wonder how it compare a M-35 Lux Asph in such term. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.