Jump to content

Do you Crop ?


Findus

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

After my 50mm useage question, I have a follow-up, do you crop your photographs, either digital-, or wet development process ?

 

If not; what is your reasoning for this

 

If yes; what makes you decide to crop, and do you use specific photographic rules for this ?

 

Does cropping generally enhance the purpose of photography ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I definitely do (in the darkroom -- no digital camera), for purely compositional reasons that were not possible to achieve when I took the photo. In my case, being the amateur that I am, it is usually to get rid of clutter in the margins of the photo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK might of phrased the question wrong, I crop too, minimally but I do at times.

 

But I allways try and look for the perfect in frame composure upon taking the photograph, I personally find uncropped 50mm (the only lenght I shoot) gives the most satisfactory results, often crop look unnatural, but this is very subjective ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest menze_as

I always try not to crop - and I definitely do not crop out of size 3:2 or 6x6. Photographing to me is to compose a scene through the viewfinder before making the picture. It is like painting: a painter wouldn't paint a picture and then cut off parts of the linen.

One only learns to compose a picture if he is limited to the sizes - that's my opinion to that.

 

Greetings, Astrid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course.

 

1. To improve composition - generally by "tightening up", or by correcting my habitual 1.5 degree lean to the right.

 

2. To "find" other images within the one I have taken.

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

A painter, however, might not paint on the whole of the canvas. So far, at least, I find that the only times I do crop are on architectural shots when I was physically unable to get the composition I wanted when I took the photograph.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I see an image in the world before me, I perceive it as a total composition which includes boundaries. Those boundaries frequently assume different dimensions. My range of cameras, whilst varied, often don't exactly match the subject proportinally. In such cases, either I compromise the perceived subject shape, or use the camera to 'best fit' the picture and crop afterwards to regain the perceived image.

 

Cropping in the camera, by the above theory, is a compromise. Cropping in the darkroom or on the computer allows retention of image integrity as perceived.

 

This all assumes that the photographer decides the composition rather than the equipment.:D

 

Just another POV.

 

Cheers,

Erl

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure - because you can in the required enlargement process. You want the true challenge of unforgiving croplessness? Do large format contact prints.

 

On HCB: Yeah. I understand he left the developing and printing to others, and his standing orders were probably to print full-frame, but I'll bet that more than once he leaned over the shoulder of his favorite printer-person and said, "Maybe we just take out zat telephone pole along zee right edge."

Link to post
Share on other sites

80% no..I prefer a natural framing of my lens, when printing ( from the enlarger to the easel) the usual 10mm framing lines on the photo or full frame.

20% because :

1) it was impossible to frame the image correctly at the time

2) I was simply not paying attention to the framing

3) salvage the good part of a " once in a lifetime shot

 

Cheers, JRM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst cropping can be the last refuge of the scoundrel - 'if you crop enough, you'll find a good picture in there somewhere..' or 'get in close - it'll make a good alternative to having to worry about composition..' in reality cropping is as valid a post production technique as any other (eg printing on a certain paper, or printing a litytle darker or lighter for effect) and is as valid a form of artistic interpretation, too. It's the final picture as offered, not as shot, that counts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are on the east bank of the Mississippi. You are carrying your m6 and 35mm lens. On the other side you spy Elvis and Hitler, each naked, sunbathing. Elvis is rubbing sun lotion on Amelia Earhart's back. Do you shoot and crop or pass on the photo?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...