Luke_Miller Posted October 27, 2010 Share #1 Posted October 27, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) I recently picked up a used 24mm Elmarit for my M8.2. I notice that its focus ring is much more damped than that of my 28mm Summicron that I bought new. Focus on the Elmarit is smooth, but the effort required to move the ring is noticeably higher than with my Summicron. The effort is consistant throughout its movement. Is this normal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 Hi Luke_Miller, Take a look here Question for 24mm Elmarit users . I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
wparsonsgisnet Posted October 27, 2010 Share #2 Posted October 27, 2010 I find that my 24/2.8 is pretty easy to focus, more so, in fact, than my 50 'lux-a. The lens I find hardest to focus among those I have is the 75 'lux. It is my "stiffest" lens. Of course, the lens that needs the least focusing is the widest, no? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke_Miller Posted October 30, 2010 Author Share #3 Posted October 30, 2010 Thanks, Bill. My used 24 Elmarit is much stiffer focusing that either of the lenses I purchased new (28 and 50 Summicrons). But since focus is smooth it does not impair operation other than the additional effort required. So I will accept it as-is. For zone focus work it may be an advantage as focus is not likely to accidentally shift due to handling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted October 30, 2010 Share #4 Posted October 30, 2010 A certain difference in the "effort" one must apply to focus can be normal... is a torque which depends on the mass of the assembly you rotate: a lens with heavy glass elements and a chrome (=heavier than black) mount could be typical in this sense: my Elmarit 24 (chrome, new) is appreciably harder to rotate than my black Elmarit 28. And my Elmarit 21 asph (chrome, too) is a bit stiffer than the 24, though the mount is apparently identical (but design is quite different, and the 21 has "more glass" in the moving part of the lens). If you do not feel friction or irregularity in stiffness within the throw movement, don't worry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke_Miller Posted October 31, 2010 Author Share #5 Posted October 31, 2010 Thanks, luigi My lenses are all black, but your point concerning the increased mass of the lens elements increasing the resistance makes perfect sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrism Posted October 31, 2010 Share #6 Posted October 31, 2010 Spend an evening twisting the focus ring back and forth. It will become as silky smooth as any other lens that has been through the process. Chris Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_n Posted November 1, 2010 Share #7 Posted November 1, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) For a couple of years I had two 24 Elmarits, one silver and one black. The silver one was more heavily damped than the black, and I put it down to the brass construction, but I have a black paint 35 Summicron and 50 Summilux (also brass) and they're as light to focus as the black 24 Elmarit. Probably just sample variation. I've used a number of Hexanon-M lenses and they're all consistently fairly heavily damped, but then the QC at Konica is legendary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.