Jump to content

Voigtlander Nocton 25 f:0,95 for micro4/3


Paolo.Battista

Recommended Posts

Have you seen this announce?

Yes, sure. Wonder how it will perform at full aperture, compared to the Noctilux-M 50 mm Asph.

 

 

Is Cosina trying to develop an alternative rangefinder platform based on micro4/3 standard?

1. How are we supposed to how?

2. Why would the announcement of that lens bring you to this idea in the first place?

 

It's just a new lens for the Micro-4/3 standard, that's all. Of course it would be a nice move to introduce a new µ-4/3 camera with a real high-precision mechanical rangefinder ... however I'm afraid development and manufacture would be too expensive be be economical. So I guess it won't happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

O1af and Paolo, I can't find anything about this lens on the internet. Would you mind posting a link?

 

Or are you referring to the not-Voigtlander 50mm f/0.95 "Noctor" in (manual) M4/3 mount, which was discussed here months ago: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-forum/118748-new-nocton-50mm-f0-95-a.html#post1260676 ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting in terms of light gathering capacity but with 4/3 the DOF is similar to a f/1.9 lens, although it will allow considerable 3D isolation. Another concern would be lack or presence of distortion abberations etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, with 4/3 format, depth-of-field will be precisely that of an f/0.95 lens.

AFAIK 4/3 has a crop factor of 2 so then the depth of field is larger than on a FF sensor giving an "equivalent aperture" of 2x 0.95 = 1.9 (this is the "form follows format" relation described by Peter Karbe, which is a slight simplification - but usually considered good enough as a rule of thumb).

 

It remains f/0.95 in terms of light gathering capacity obviously.

 

Anyway there is no point in rehashing this point further as it has been discussed at length (to death) in previous discussions - see here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

... giving an "equivalent aperture" of 2 × 0.95 = 1.9 ...

My point is this: An aperture of f/0.95 on 4/3 format is not equivalent to f/1.9. Instead, it is equivalent in terms of DOF to f/1.9 on 35-mm full-frame format.

 

And please don't think that's just splitting hairs. It's not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My mistake this is a 50 ...

And it is no Voigtländer lens; instead, it's an obscure brand named 'Noktor' ... which most likely has been deliberately chosen for the purpose of being confused with Voigtländer's product name 'Nokton'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...