farnz Posted January 9, 2010 Share #1 Posted January 9, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Can anybody tell me, is there any downside (other than price of course) to using an APO 2x extender with non-APO lenses? I realise that this wouldn't completely correct the image apochromatically but would it partly do so and would there be any other optical effects to beware of? Thanks, Pete. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 9, 2010 Posted January 9, 2010 Hi farnz, Take a look here APO 2x extender with non-APO lenses?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
masjah Posted January 9, 2010 Share #2 Posted January 9, 2010 Pete, I think that the APO designation means that the Extender won't introduce any significant chromatic aberration of its own, but I doubt that it would do anything to sort out chromatic aberration introduced by the lens at its front. Indeed, if it did, it would be introducing CA of ts own, since it would be refracting rays of different wavelength in different ways! So I suspect that any CA from the lens itself would simply get magnified by the Extender. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 9, 2010 Share #3 Posted January 9, 2010 No- it will perform better than an older one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicamr Posted January 9, 2010 Share #4 Posted January 9, 2010 Many years ago I purchased the non APO version. I returned it to the dealer straight away. I do use the 1.4x and 2x APO's and they are superb. Mark Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted January 9, 2010 Author Share #5 Posted January 9, 2010 Gents, Thanks for your replies, which give me food for thought. John, that's an interesting angle - it hadn't occurred to me that the APO-extender actually might magnify any inherent CA from the non-APO lens (without it adding any of its own) but logic suggests that the very process of magnification of the image might also magnify any aberrations. I was looking at it from a purely additive and subtractive point of view where the lens would have a positive CA constant and the APO-extender would have a smaller negative CA constant by virtue of its being APO-corrected but this model may be a little simplistic. Hmm ... Jaap, when you say "better" I've assumed that you mean that CA will be slightly corrected but I may have misinterpreted. Is this based on experience fromyour R lenses and R9/DMR kit? Mark, since you mention the APO 1.4x extender, which I believe can only be used on a small number of APO lenses (although I'm happy to be corrected ), it's not clear to me whether your experiences were with APO or non-APO lenses; would you kindly let me know please? Pete. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted January 9, 2010 Share #6 Posted January 9, 2010 (edited) I used to have a "normal" 2x extender. When I replaced it by an Apo-extender, the difference was rather spectacular.It is not just the "APO" designation, it is simply optically superior. I think you must interpret the designation that it will not add any additional CA, as opposed to the non-APO extender. It was still in the film days and the lens I used it on was the 280/4.0 APO. I don't think there is a non-APO 1.4x extender. It can be used on quite a number of lenses, provided the rear lens element is not placed too far rearward. Edited January 9, 2010 by jaapv Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.