Jump to content

Poll - Would you have bought an R10?


rick_dykstra

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I would have purchased 2 if they were in the D3X price range. I was saving and planning on it actually. Also, then would have purchased a 35mm and the 180 f2.8. But, that is a dead issue now. Looking at the Nikon D3X or D700 with all new Nikon glass.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Posto 6

I would have bought one or two, and had actually recently expanded my R-lens collection in anticipation. I have no interest or intention of acting as a guinea-pig for Leica by getting an S2, which I find to be expensive, untested and having an uncertain future in the marketplace, even more so now in view of Leica's "commitment" to their existing users.

 

Frankly, I am getting a bit tired of Leica Camera AG and their uncertain commitment to and capacity for a viable future, and will probably move to a more mainstream supplier in future for my digital requirements. I am certain that I will retain my film Leicas, which represent the apogee of this medium, but perhaps Leica had better develop more of an entrepreneurial spirit if they wish to find a niche. All we hear are excuses, and as consumers, we are supposed to be grateful that a company still exists calling itself Leica.

 

The innovation, foresight, risk-taking spirit and cohesive structure present at the start of thge 1929 crisis in Ernst Leitz Wetzlar are nowhere to be found in today's rather mediocre, defensive and backward-looking Leica trademark licensee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...