matiasgd Posted May 9, 2009 Share #21 Posted May 9, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) I do, an uses when I have a film batch of 10 to 20 rolls of B&W film ( app. 8 times a year) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 Hi matiasgd, Take a look here Who still uses a darkroom?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest wls.shanghai Posted May 9, 2009 Share #22 Posted May 9, 2009 I do - and I like it B&W prints up to 40x50 cm - Baryt and PE (mostly ILFORD paper) for me it's a great pleasure - Live out my creativity Regards wls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huubl Posted May 9, 2009 Share #23 Posted May 9, 2009 I did B&W wet printing up to about 15 years ago. Used a Durst M600 for the 6x6s from the Roleicord and 35mm from my other cameras. Since about three years ago I'm gradually returning to film from DSLR shooting mainly. The acquisition of a couple of nice RFs was a major cause to that. Yesterday I got a Leica Focomat V35 from the lab at work and today I worked in the attick all day to convert a small bathroom to become my next dark room. I hope to be in business again next week or so. BTW, anybody knows how to open and clean the dust out of the V35's focotar 40mm f/2.8? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aauckland Posted May 9, 2009 Share #24 Posted May 9, 2009 I produce a high percentage of digital images, (from my DSLR's), but for my real passion I return to the darkroom. The tactile feel, and look, of B&W Fibre prints, produced by the wet process, is uniquely beautiful. I have a permanent darkkroom setup, with 3 enlargers: Omega C760XL, (Diocroic Head) Agfa Varioscope 6.5x9, (Condenser Head.) Durst M805, 6x9. (Diocroic Head.) All have their individual uses, although I probably prefer my Agfa. My "Wet" workflow, includes initial negative scanning, and producing my prefered "Print Look", digitally. Since with Photoshop, I can produce, (quick and dirty), results, that I then use as a reference in my "Wet" darkroom. ....I find this "Digital" step invaluable, for assessment and evaluation, prior to moving into the "wet" process. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
recrag Posted May 10, 2009 Share #25 Posted May 10, 2009 After years of digital picture taking and inkjet printing, I got my M3 out of its hiding place and bought a roll of Tri-X. I am fortunate to live half a block from The Looking Glass Photo store in Berkeley where there is a well equipped and maintained darkroom. You can't really compare digital printing with chemical photo printing. They are two different worlds. Light transforming emulsion into image is magic. There is no magic in Photoshop. And as in doing anything with your hands, the time spent and the process you use is a gift you give yourself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xjr Posted May 10, 2009 Share #26 Posted May 10, 2009 Have complete darkroom permanently set up for my B&W work and use it regularly. Don't bother with digital cameras but I DO SCAN all my slides and B&W films for my records and replacing albums with books. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbretteville Posted May 10, 2009 Share #27 Posted May 10, 2009 Advertisement (gone after registration) Use it to develop b/w negs, from there on its a digital workflow. Its kind of sad as I like spending time printing. Two upsides: it is a lot kinder on relationship with the Mrs. and I'm better at it than I was in a whet darkroom. - Carl Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don'tknowmuch Posted May 11, 2009 Share #28 Posted May 11, 2009 I currently scan and print, but have got plans to get wet again as I think the prints are much nicer. Paper that one prints onto makes a lot of difference. I wanted to ask, though, about dust... I always have to work on a scanned image to get rid of dust, but never noticed it in the past... Do you/we think I'm working in a dustier environment (quite possible) or does one notice it more when looking at scanned images? Jim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hiles Posted May 12, 2009 Share #29 Posted May 12, 2009 Do you/we think I'm working in a dustier environment (quite possible) or does one notice it more when looking at scanned images? Jim. Interesting. I would like to hear how people eliminate or minimize dust on negatives (and subsequently prints) when printing in the classic darkroom. What do you do? How well does it work? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aauckland Posted May 12, 2009 Share #30 Posted May 12, 2009 Air blower brushes, cotton clothes, and an insane level of paranoia. It can be slightly easier if you use glassless negative carriers, (but I don't on Medium format.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrewer Posted May 12, 2009 Share #31 Posted May 12, 2009 ME! Well, actually I share it...but I still love it Do enlarging and prints, too! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajthornbury Posted May 12, 2009 Share #32 Posted May 12, 2009 I used to many years ago, but with then having a young family my photographic activity declined, now with the advent of Digital my interest has been re awakened. But without a wet, and hot dark room. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotohuis Posted May 12, 2009 Share #33 Posted May 12, 2009 I still have a darkroom: From 35mm to 6x7cm with Split Grade system. Furrther I am also doing color RA-4 with a Thermaphot 252. Scanning: Via my flatbed Epson V500 from prints or from film for the internet. I like working in my darkroom. Everything is calm and not so hectic with all that computer stuff. 35mm: Leica and Canon. 6x4,5: Mamiya 645 pro and 6x6: Yashica Mat 124-G. What I like most is the Leica M7 and the Yashica TLR. Both great cameras. Best regards, Robert Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mongrelnomad Posted May 12, 2009 Share #34 Posted May 12, 2009 Just started again after a 12 year hiatus. Was surprised how much easier developing film was than I remembered - that feeling when you empty out the fixer and take a look that first time is just such a rush. Not sure about wet-printing though. Don't get me wrong, I love it, but while I can do my own developing while watching Wire reruns, I have to rent a darkroom and the whole process is too time-cosuming to do regularly. That said, though, with a scanner, I'll only wet-print the absolute best shots... Oh, and 120 B+W? Gorgeous... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boilerdoc Posted May 13, 2009 Share #35 Posted May 13, 2009 Absolutely! I do digital if I can't get a good B&W from a neg. But for the most part it's TMY-2, Leica lenses and M7, and a Focomat enlarger. Not only am I doing straight B&W prints but I'm expanding into Lith prints as well as Palladium. And don't forget solarizing. It's all DR work and it is the craft and art of photography. Hands on and from the heart.... Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenneth Posted May 13, 2009 Share #36 Posted May 13, 2009 I still like to hang around red light areas and would not thank you for a scanner in fact a friend offered me his old Nikon scanner but I turned down his kind offer Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/84224-who-still-uses-a-darkroom/?do=findComment&comment=899016'>More sharing options...
kleinfel@alaska.net Posted May 15, 2009 Share #37 Posted May 15, 2009 I sure do. Black and white, traditional silver film, makes better prints than digital. My digital prints for some reason look as though they're torn out of magazines, less force. It's different for color. There's so much more I can do, and so much more longevity, with Photoshop etc. that that's all I use to print. But a lot of photos are scanned in negatives. And it's different for a black and white negative that was extremely difficult to print. Once I get a good 8 x 10, I scan in the print and work from that, toning the printout to minimize the clipped from magazine look. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drums1977 Posted May 15, 2009 Share #38 Posted May 15, 2009 I've started film development again after many years. I don't have a darkroom though... Just a dark bag and a bathroom sink! I'm loving its come back for the moment. But I don't do prints, just stick my negs in my V700. About dust: When I used to send rolls to the shop for development I had to spend a LONG time removing dust marks in PS. Now with the good old home process the negaives turn out to be much cleaner, specially if the final wash is done with distilled water. By the way, I always dry-wipe the scanner surfaces before scanning and use Tetenal Graphic Arts Cleaner for very dirty negatives. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riccis Posted May 15, 2009 Share #39 Posted May 15, 2009 Me, me, me... While I don't care about developing film, this is all done by my lab, I do get to spend a lot of time in the darkroom. Actually, all my high end clients get fine art monographs that are 100% printed in fiber in the darkroom. Cheers, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
orni100 Posted May 15, 2009 Share #40 Posted May 15, 2009 Hello, I do both - 70% scanning and printing though. I don´t care about small size photos out of the darkroom. If wet development, than bigger 20x30 cm. Just cannot enjoy smaller sized pictures. Besides a full equipment at home, I have the luck to know some people, who like the darkroom too and we meet up once a month in a schoolbuilding in our darkroom to work together. Regards Dieter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.