Jump to content

The 1,4x viewfinder magnifier (with an M5)


Finnkare

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Has anyone got their hands on the new 1,4x-viewfinder magnifier yet? I'm mostly considered, whether it will make the bottom part of the M5 finder invisible, so that the exposure metering and/or the shutter speed isn't available for the shooters eye? I don't have glasses.

 

I have a third party 1,25x-magnifier, and it doesn't block the info. The magnifier is a bit thicker than the Leica one, I heard, so it makes it even harder for me to evaluate the effect of the 1,4x one. The 1,4x seems quite thick, most likely even thicker than the 1,25 that i have.

 

In about a month from now, we're probably losing the last shop that keeps Leica stuff on its shelves. The shopkeeper is retiring and hasn't found anyone to continue. So I won't most likely be able to check it myself. Of course I would be extremely grateful to that person, who could check it for me with an M5... If not with an own one, then with a shop's one.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I don't own one of these, but I've tried it last Photokina on my Leica MP. I found the angle of view too narrow to be usefull - I could hardly see the complete 50mm frame. I'm quite sure that with the M5 you won't be able to see the exposure meter.

 

Best regards,

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I thought already it would be mainly for the teles, with the 75 as "ideal". So for a "real tele-M" one should buy the .85 or an M3 and magnify it with 1,25 or 1,4, so that 90 or 135mm would be ideal.

 

It should change the .72 magnification to 1, quite excactly. Is it a big deal? Wonder how it compares to the .91 magnification of M3. With or without the third party 1,15x magnifier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hello Finncare,

 

If you had an M3 you might not need any additional magnifier for a 50, 90 or 135.

 

An M3 is just as nice of a camera to use as an M5. The major difference other than the built in, as opposed to external, meter is that the M3 is better designed to optimize focussing & viewing with the longer focal lengths of 90 & 135. With a a 50mm lens the +'s & -'s of 1 or the other more or less even themselves out.

 

Best Regards MCMLXXXIII,

 

Michael.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Finncare,

 

If you had an M3 you might not need any additional magnifier for a 50, 90 or 135.

 

An M3 is just as nice of a camera to use as an M5. The major difference other than the built in, as opposed to external, meter is that the M3 is better designed to optimize focussing & viewing with the longer focal lengths of 90 & 135. With a a 50mm lens the +'s & -'s of 1 or the other more or less even themselves out.

 

Best Regards MCMLXXXIII,

 

Michael.

 

Yes I know, I have both and I largely agree with you; the M3 is a pleasure to frame, especially because of the almost 1:1 finder, but then again, the M5 is very handy in metering, also because of the clear focusing area and very intuitive analog scale.

 

That was my whole point: can the 1,4x magnifier be used to combine the best of both worlds: a 1:1 viewfinder on the M5, with the metering scale and (almost all of) the 50mm frameline visible?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...