Jump to content

35mm 3.5 Collapsable Summicron?


kenneth

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I found the above in very good condition for £150.00. Thoughts suggestions on this or something other to use on my M6 as a general compact snapping lens would, as usual be appreciated. `I e-mailed the dealer and he reckons it is a Summaron and not a Summicron- Image included

Link to post
Share on other sites

it has summaron written on it so I guess its a summaron:D

 

very nice lens..I use it a lot.

 

andy

 

.....and if its a screw mount one as it looks to be its very cheap at £150, they are 'collectors items' unfortunatley

 

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....and if its a screw mount one as it looks to be its very cheap at £150, they are 'collectors items' unfortunatley

 

Gerry

 

So would you suggest I buy it for the purpose I suggest in my initial post?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure it's collapsible? If so I suspect it's unique and therefore worth buying regardless of performance.

 

Ages ago I had an ordinary (non-collapsible) screw mount f/3.5 Summaron and didn't like it. I remember it as being very soft and low in contrast - though since others here have spoken highly of them I may just have been unlucky.

 

For a general compact snapping lens I'd rather have a 35mm Summicron; I've been very happy with my late pre-ASPH version.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure it's collapsible? If so I suspect it's unique and therefore worth buying regardless of performance.

 

Ages ago I had an ordinary (non-collapsible) screw mount f/3.5 Summaron and didn't like it. I remember it as being very soft and low in contrast - though since others here have spoken highly of them I may just have been unlucky.

 

For a general compact snapping lens I'd rather have a 35mm Summicron; I've been very happy with my late pre-ASPH version.

 

Good question, I guess I assumed it was. I have a 35mm Summicron asph. The appeal is a collapsable for minimalist wanderings

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

It's a fine lens. I use one on my MP quite a bit. However the Summaron 35/3.5 you have pictured is a thread mount, not a M mount. And it is not collapsible, nor is there any such thing as far as I know (collapsible 35). Good luck! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CV 35 2.5 Skopar (in LTM or M mount) is an excellent lens for the same kind of money and very small/light.

 

I have them both, and I agree with James. I have the first pancake version (LTM) that I went back to having moved to the M version and disliked the handling and comparative bulk. The CV is a "modern" lens with excellent rendition and contrast, while the Summaron delivers creamier results. Both are very good at what they do.

 

My Summaron permanently wears a 35mm adaptor ring and forms part of my M2 "trinity", the other two being a 50mm DR Summicron and a 90mm Collapsible Elmar.

 

Regards,

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

So would you suggest I buy it for the purpose I suggest in my initial post?

 

I was confusing it with the 2.8 version, but it seems a good price for a late type 3.5, if its in good condition, I have the earlier mount and its good, but its a bit slow at 3.5. If you want a Leica lens its the cheapest 35 you will get, but the Voigtlander 35/2.5 goes for not much more secondhand and is very good, faster and more contrasty.

I doubt its 'collapsible, the picture is identical to the one on page 142 of Laney, bog standard mount I think.

 

Gerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

One for sale here at reasonable £120 inc. keeper MXV Photographic Ltd. Fine, used photographic equipment bought and sold since 1990.

 

The one above is at Ffordes and they have erroneously called it a Summicron. They also have another one at just £125 https://secure.ffordes.com/index.htm

 

Cheers

 

dunk

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Summaron in M mount with f/2,8 maximum aperature is said to be a classic performer. I read that it has improved glass and coatings over the f/3,5 version. I have used both versions and I thought very highly of the f2,8 version. Look around in the classifieds here and on Photo.net and on Rff; I have seem some around ranging from 500 to 700 USD depending on the condition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...