Jump to content

Warning, potentially fake black paint M3 on ebay!


KM-25

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

This is looking pretty fake to me and is going for an unlawful price. If you have bid on it, I would seriously consider retracting it ASAP!

 

Ebay item: 280249378257

 

There is a thread on it at Range Finder Forum:

 

This doesn't look right to me... - Rangefinderforum.com

 

There were some B/P M3's in the early days, MIR has a good page on it:

 

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography...aint/index.htm

 

But the shutter speed dial is what threw me off, way too early to be real. There is also a preview lever which is too early for that serial. Look at the Mir one, it is only 6 numbers off yet no preview lever or late shutter and is obviously real. The film door has the upper studs near the edges of the door in the Mir M3 while the ebay one has them closer to the center.

 

The seller has a no return policy. I think this is as some one else has posted, a put together of scrap parts, criminal for how much it is going for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Its a real M3, and it does have black paint so in that sense its genuine. Its just that its not an original factory paint job but was probably done very recently.

 

What I don't understand is how can it be criminal to ask whatever price you want to - its up to the buyer to decide whether its worth the money or not.

 

I could ask £50K for my standard M2. I doubt anyone would pay it though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope none is so STUPID to pay that obscene amount for a camera that, at least, ought to be very seriously inspected to be identified: besides the time scale you have correctly pointed (ought to have 1/5 - 1/10...) , there is also the frame selector lever (which officially was introduced at 785.801), and the film pressure plate looks metal...it was glass-made until 844.000...; let's give even a SMALL chance it was a late factory "update"... but the strongest chance it's a ROUGH fake (finishing and probably s/n).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have bought some original factory parts from this seller in the past, to restore some cameras. I was told that she had bought a huge inventory of surplus parts from Ernst Leitz Canada some time ago. She was also selling not too long ago original black paint parts. Summing 1+1, I'd dare to say that the parts are original, the camera very probably not.

 

A clear case in which the sum of the parts shouldn't have been equal to the total ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have bought some original factory parts from this seller in the past, to restore some cameras. I was told that she had bought a huge inventory of surplus parts from Ernst Leitz Canada some time ago. She was also selling not too long ago original black paint parts. Summing 1+1, I'd dare to say that the parts are original, the camera very probably not.

 

A clear case in which the sum of the parts shouldn't have been equal to the total ;)

 

Well said... putting together a number of (original) parts and so obtaining a fantastically rare "original" Leica, is not a good reason to try to get a big amount of money for it... I'd even say it is not a so correct business... if a camera is RECONSTRUCTED from original parts, is better to declare it clearly...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...