Jump to content

Panasonics Micro 4/3rds Mirrorless DSLR


dkCambridgeshire

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ain't it ugly :eek: !

 

Yes but Leica could make it beautiful add a red dot and some Leica lenses and double the price.

 

Seriously this could be far more interesting than the recent Sigma effort. Depends on the functionality of the viewfinder, AF and of course the quality of the images.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Can we call a camera without a mirror DSLR???

At last, someone presents a more or less serious camera without prism and mirror utilizing the sensor as viewfinder. THIS IS REVOLUTIONARY, even if most people don't get it and it may not be perfect yet. Image quality of rangefinder cameras and viewfinder advantages like an SLR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be interesting if these micro lenses were usable with existing 4/3 bodies via adapter.

 

Would not be possible to maintain infinity focus ... unless had an extra lens element in the adaptor ... because the Micro Four Thirds (MFT) lens flange distance is less than the regular four thirds (RFT) lens flange distance ... would be same problem Canon had with the FD to EF adaptor ... they did make one ... but believe image quality was compromised ... and even more compromised with the independent makes of adaptor which followed ... But maybe would be possible to make an adaptor for macro photography ie no infinity focus required

 

Cheers

 

dunk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some times ago I was thinking about rangefinder camera with electronic viewfinder on this forum. Now it looks that such system can be made. See the advantages when you can remove complicated rangefinder focusing system by electronic means.

 

Irek

Link to post
Share on other sites

But don't forget the disadvantages.

 

A rangefinder is not an SLR. A camera with an electronic viewfinder is not a rangefinder. The rangefinder view of the world is the reason many of us use rangefinder cameras.

 

Stick an electronic viewfinder on a camera and you have an SLR by any other name. Can a mirrorless camera be an SLR? The argument is about semantics not its use in practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

conceptually, i like the micro4/3 idea, but this body design is not even close to what i was hoping for (which was a small D2 with interchangeable lenses).

 

this body is a generic, "ergonomic" (they think) DSLR-type body design.

 

well .... there is always hope that Leica does it right, when the time comes.

 

which is soon, i hope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well .... there is always hope that Leica does it right, when the time comes.
... where did you get the idea that Leica would drop it's M and possible R development to play in a patch that they cannot compete in?
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think M backfocus (= flange-to-sensor distance?) is 27.8 mm, so an adapter could be made.

 

But hasn't Leica said that FourThirds sensor isn't in its future? And these are the only lenses on Lumix cameras that don't say "Leica."

 

 

 

I doubt that Leica will have any part of this.

 

But it looks like a great entry from Panasonic, probably through their association with Olympus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...