stunsworth Posted September 27, 2006 Share #21 Posted September 27, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hi William, I work in software development. Not as glamorous as being a car salesman like yourself, but it pays the bills. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 Hi stunsworth, Take a look here Which you like?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Guest stnami Posted September 27, 2006 Share #22 Posted September 27, 2006 They are all pretty mundane , the painting becomes a pretty distracting blob and there is a loss of intamacy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted September 27, 2006 Share #23 Posted September 27, 2006 Was responsible for the Lord Lichfield (RIP) photography in our adverts some ten years ago. You can't expect BMW or PAG to have that kind of taste however. Have to work with what we've got. Incidentally, what is YOUR day job? In this game of "Name-drop bingo", I have nearly got a full house. Just got a "David Bailey" to go, William, so if you can help me out there Steve's opinion is just as valid whether he is picture editor of National Geographic or a lawyer, or a banker, or an IT specialist, or a guitarist or whatever he does to pay the rent. Let's keep it civil on this side, fellas. (BTW, what is PAG?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted September 27, 2006 Share #24 Posted September 27, 2006 When worked in Paris I lived just around the corner from Cartier-Bresson if that helps in the name dropping stakes :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stnami Posted September 27, 2006 Share #25 Posted September 27, 2006 I used to hang around with Little Bo Peep in the back of the schoolyard and played show and tell until the lambs had to go home pun intended Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambroving Posted September 27, 2006 Share #26 Posted September 27, 2006 This is about selling a shot to a phone company. As Brent indicted, #1 works for a variety of reasons. Brent makes his living doing this and I did for three years buying the stuff. Trust any thread I post on to degrade into a pissing match with the Manchester/Liverpool Moaning Club... Opinions are as valid as the poster. Consider the source and move on. This is Thorsten's thread. If Thorsten wants to take issue with my comments, fine. If you want to express an opinion, I'm sure he'll also consider the source. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted September 27, 2006 Share #27 Posted September 27, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Indeed it is Thorsten's thread. Thorsten asked for opinions about the images. People responded to that request. You described their comments as 'idiotic' . To keep on topic, I think the first one is the strongest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overgaard Posted September 27, 2006 Author Share #28 Posted September 27, 2006 Les, Thanks for your participation. The two "executives" in the back is an interesting idea. In Scandinavia even that (very american concept of execs) would communicate and lift her importance to a higher level above them (if needed I don't knwo; the article will tell her job). Most execs in Dansih companies dress quite casual though. But in Grundfoss, being an international company with many visitors each day, the dresscode is more international. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bresson Posted September 27, 2006 Share #29 Posted September 27, 2006 Thorsten: #1 and #3 but not for the insensitive and sexist although most likely cultural differences given by Ravi. Nice work and thanks for sharing Brian Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lesh Posted September 28, 2006 Share #30 Posted September 28, 2006 Thorsten, Thanks, yes, dress codes have changed, business casual is now a global thing. Those under 30 should watch something like "Room at the Top" just to see what used to be normal office attire. You should be pleased that the series has generated so much comment, the different perspectives have made for interesting reading. Still like the effect of the fan back chairs in No. 1. Incidentally, the reference to a 'tea lady' should have given my UK background away. Since you do this stuff professionally it's good of you to solicit views and opinions - hope you do so again. regards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.