simonpg Posted July 9, 2008 Share #1 Posted July 9, 2008 Advertisement (gone after registration) I saw an article about Leica's business fortunes on Buzzle.com, which shows the article from Guardian Newspapers - a shareholder meeting has been called in response to a a reported full year los by Leica of E15,5m (Euros) loss. It's dated 8th July. Here is the link: Leica Faces Extinction As Digitals Snap Up Business The article certainly paints a bleak future for this beloved company and its products. Personally the article seems quite contrary to general industry "talk" in recent times. However, all will be revealed at the shareholder meeting according to the article. "Fingers crossed"! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted July 9, 2008 Posted July 9, 2008 Hi simonpg, Take a look here Leica - Business News. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
marknorton Posted July 9, 2008 Share #2 Posted July 9, 2008 This is a ludicrous, ridiculous post chasing a ludicrous, ridiculous article which refers to the state of the company in 2005, not 2008. Since then, Leica has been largely bought by Dr Kaufmann's investment vehicle, ACM. It may be dated 8 July, it's the year they've got wrong. Just goes to show you don't want to believe what you read on the internet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted July 9, 2008 Share #3 Posted July 9, 2008 First of all, who are these 'shareholders' that the article refers to? And the article contains this gem,,, "The company, which has replaced its chief executive, appears to be pinning its hopes on its pioneering digital camera, the digital module R, which allows photographers to use the same camera body for digital and film pictures" Pinning it hopes on a camera it stoped manufacturing quite a while ago? Poor journalism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted July 9, 2008 Share #4 Posted July 9, 2008 Except the Chief Executive they are referring to is not SKL but Hans Peter-Cohn who was indeed kicked out and went on to run an Austrian furniture company if I recall. The PR person they refer to, Gero Furchheim has also moved on from Leica. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted July 9, 2008 Share #5 Posted July 9, 2008 It says "© Copyright Guardian Newspapers 2008" at the bottom... There will be an apology to link to tomorrow, correcting all the inaccuracies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
palec Posted July 9, 2008 Share #6 Posted July 9, 2008 This is the original article in Guardian more than 3 years ago: Leica faces extinction as digitals snap up business | World news | The Guardian Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted July 9, 2008 Share #7 Posted July 9, 2008 Advertisement (gone after registration) In that case, it seems to me that buzzle.com is completely pointless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuny Posted July 9, 2008 Share #8 Posted July 9, 2008 As more fuel to the buzzle.com fire of irresponsible reporting, here's a Retuers Plus screen showing Leica ADRs as of last night. Please note that the current quote is at the year's high (US$19) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest joewehry Posted July 10, 2008 Share #9 Posted July 10, 2008 I am constantly amazed and disappointed how quickly web surfers will believe and pass around inaccurate information without researching. One simply has to go to Leica's web site and within a few clicks discover that fiscal "2007/2008 closed with 7.3% sales growth and group net income of [Euro] 3.0 million." And if our attention span is any longer than 1/30 second (handheld, of course, at f/2), we might even be tempted to read the whole report. Gosh, we're LEICA users! One could hope we'd have better critical thinking skills.... : - ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted July 10, 2008 Share #10 Posted July 10, 2008 Never heard of Buzzle before - where did they drag this old story up from and why? The internet is full of mis-information like this. People just take whatever is written as fact and rarely bother to try and substantiate it, which as Joe says its a matter of a few clicks of the mouse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.