philipandre Posted April 8, 2008 Share #1 Posted April 8, 2008 Advertisement (gone after registration) The mout M and code for M8 ( Noctilux code ) The test Canon 50 mm 0.95 aperture f:1.4 ( not postraitment )/ M8 - 160 iso -1/3 fstop Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 Hi philipandre, Take a look here M8 and Canon 0.95 ! Good ! . I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
danyves Posted April 8, 2008 Share #2 Posted April 8, 2008 Welcome here ! Fine and good ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephan_w Posted April 8, 2008 Share #3 Posted April 8, 2008 Salut Philippe Dommage que tu ne ne le vends plus ..... je serais aquéreur Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravastar Posted April 8, 2008 Share #4 Posted April 8, 2008 Welcome Am I correct in thinking that your lens is the TV version that has been modified? There is no cut out in the rear element. Did you purchase the lens already modified or did you have someone convert it to the M mount? I have a TV lens and find it very useful on the M8. The UV-IR filter was rather expensive though. Bob. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe D. Posted April 8, 2008 Share #5 Posted April 8, 2008 Hi Philippe and welcome! Very nice conversion, what a beautiful craftsmanship, looks like a jewel ! This could only be made in Paris by an artist ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted April 8, 2008 Share #6 Posted April 8, 2008 Beautiful mount ! But...I can't see the RF cam... or is the internal ring that acts like it ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe D. Posted April 8, 2008 Share #7 Posted April 8, 2008 Advertisement (gone after registration) I can't see the RF cam... or is the internal ring that acts like it ?Bingo!I asked Philippe the same question this afternoon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephan_w Posted April 9, 2008 Share #8 Posted April 9, 2008 AFAK there are several ways to adapt this lens to Leica M-mount. This version here looks very clean, so can anyone tell a little more about it? Was it made in France? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipandre Posted April 10, 2008 Author Share #9 Posted April 10, 2008 Welcome Am I correct in thinking that your lens is the TV version that has been modified? There is no cut out in the rear element. Did you purchase the lens already modified or did you have someone convert it to the M mount? I have a TV lens and find it very useful on the M8. The UV-IR filter was rather expensive though. Bob. Sorry ! ! my English is very very very bad ... lol ... " go " ! Yes Bob is TV version ... very good and simple for modified en Leica mount! The Canon 7 version is more complicated - the optic construction is identical. My original lens had a modified mounting of visoflex… correct for argentic Leica ! For the M8, the new mount is perfect ... The UV/IR filter ! ! oualou ! ! ! yes ! very expensive in diameter 62 @Stephan ... Yes in France ... ( cocorico ! ! ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plasticman Posted April 10, 2008 Share #10 Posted April 10, 2008 Hi Phillipe! I'd like to know if this conversion was done in Europe? I recently missed an 0,95 at an auction (arrived 5 minutes too late!), and I'm keen to get one someday, but I don't know anyone who converts to Leica mount - and this conversion looks perfect. Thanks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipandre Posted April 11, 2008 Author Share #11 Posted April 11, 2008 Hi Phillipe! I'd like to know if this conversion was done in Europe? I recently missed an 0,95 at an auction (arrived 5 minutes too late!), and I'm keen to get one someday, but I don't know anyone who converts to Leica mount - and this conversion looks perfect. Thanks! Oh yes ... very perfect conversion and very good result ...(TV model only) Yes, this conversion being realized into of France. exactly in a Leica workshop in Paris… to be to him a friend The look M8 / 0.95 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hacker Posted April 11, 2008 Share #12 Posted April 11, 2008 The UV/IR filter ! ! oualou ! ! ! yes ! very expensive in diameter 62 72mm you mean. US$187 is the best price I have seen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipandre Posted April 14, 2008 Author Share #13 Posted April 14, 2008 OUP'S ....yes ... 72 mm . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leitz_not_leica Posted April 14, 2008 Share #14 Posted April 14, 2008 The bokeh gave me a headache. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest andre56 Posted April 14, 2008 Share #15 Posted April 14, 2008 Where can I buy this littel toy :confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hacker Posted April 14, 2008 Share #16 Posted April 14, 2008 Where can I buy this littel toy :confused: CANON 50MM F0.95 RANGEFINDER LENS MINT +BOX +CAPS +MORE - eBay (item 280216207989 end time Apr-14-08 19:56:09 PDT) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
egibaud Posted April 14, 2008 Share #17 Posted April 14, 2008 Salut Philipandre, ça va? Great pic, I can imagine you are no longer crying for a Noctilux, your Canon 0.95 gives great results at a lower price. Amicalement, Eric Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotografr Posted April 14, 2008 Share #18 Posted April 14, 2008 Looking at the photo of the M8 with lens attached, it seems like a large portion of the frame would be blocked. Is that the case? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravastar Posted April 14, 2008 Share #19 Posted April 14, 2008 To give you an idea of what the lens is capable of at full aperture here is a part of a series which was taken for an artist's album cover at a debut concert in LA last year. The stage background has been removed for the cover. Unfortunately I didn't have a large enough UV-IR filter at the time and the background was a black synthetic cloth drape lit by lamps rich in IR . Tungsten light levels were extremely low, 1/30-1/60 at ISO 640-1250 f0.95. Maybe the suit was slightly dark gray bluish/magenta. Bob. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/50134-m8-and-canon-095-good/?do=findComment&comment=537462'>More sharing options...
philipandre Posted April 15, 2008 Author Share #20 Posted April 15, 2008 @fotograph The 0.95 and M8 or other body M is perfect ... no mecanic coupling problem, no parallax problem, no view problem, no light in viewer problem, no focusing problem ... @Hacker The 0.95 on line is for Canon 7 model ... difficult for adapting on Leica, not for mount, for coupling ... the TV model is better. @Eric ... tout va bien ... si tu veux, tu peux me contacter par mail. Noctilux is Noctilux ... Canon is Canon @gravastar ... Oh yes ! classic result ... the black is bleu or the black is brown magenta ... is not the lens ... is the big big big problem Leica M8 and IR ray. My Cron 90 not to have UV/IR filter… that to be terrible ... for black color ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.