Jono Slack Review: Leica Q3 Monochrom

[Eoin]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Nice and informative review as always Jono, thank you!.

I was half expecting a Q3M-43, but 28mm is the smart choice.
I really enjoy my Q2M, wonderful camera and I know that I have no need of an upgrade... ever. 

 

[AlanJW]

Thank you Jono.  As uusual, first rate.

[Filip Baraka]

Thank you for a great review. This is a Q that I could get in the future. TBH I would love a SL line monochrome.

[bilbrown]

This looks like a solid addition. I've owned and used most every Monochrom until the M11-M and now Q3-M. This is a choice however, as I think in 2025 if you shoot black and white primarily you really don't "need" a dedicated monochrome camera. Its just nice and this one is very very premium. There are some use cases, but even then Im not sure.

Let me explain.

 

 

I shoot in almost darkness for a particular project and the 1/2000 at ISO 200,000 sounds wild and usuable since many of my subjects are moving fast. But then the M10-M and Q2M both had this odd morie pattern at ISO 100,000 unless you turned off lens detection in Lightroom and C1 and sometimes that didn't even work. The M11-P has a similar pattern in color and I wonder if anyone has tested it in extreme low light (not just your living room although I am sure its dark), like almost pitch black or color LED lights? Maybe I will do it and report back.

For most things now, I use my M11-P and get basically up to ISO 12,800 or 25,000 and for what I do see no issues. I used to use my SL2-S and various Monocrom cameras for low-low-light and yes, things were sharper up to the 40MP of the M10M and 47 of the Q2M, but the 60MP of the M11/SL3/Q3 variant sensor is more than adequate to get insane sharpness even with the bayer color filter layers up to a pretty high ISO. For anything else I will add my own light or use flash.

I assume the highlights in the Q3M once gone are gone like all of the non-bayer color filter cameras. I guess there is nothing we can do about that. Sometimes and in some scenerios you need those highlights. I have learnt this the hard way more than once. Sure, I dial it down or push down the EC a stop or two, but its still rather annoying to not have a shot because the whites have ZERO information in them. Film doesn't even do that.

 

 

That said, yes of COURSE I want one...

There is something about these monochrom digital cameras that make them "spiritually" a LEICA. I miss my Mono cameras. Its WILD to tell people that it is a digital camera that ONLY shoots in black and white and get their reaction. That has opened a lot of conversations and opportunities. I love that the branding is still stealth like the Q2M and I love the addtion of the screen profiles changing per profile (although I usually stuck to one but occasionally!!).

I don't need it. I know I don't need it. But sometimes you make the best images with something that forces you to do something that you don't absolutely need to do, right.

I love that the Monochrom is now a line, with both a M and Q variant (maybe the much hoped for SL or an EV variant on the horizon!). I think the Q is phenominal and although I sold my Q2M to fund my M11P years ago, I kept my quite destroyed OG Q (Typ 106) that everyone would borrow, from my friends and assistants to my family and honestly if I go through my even recent catalogs and look to see what cameras are giving me the best images it would be my M11-P and Q, not even the Q2M. The Q2M was very good and very used, but the color Q (and I assume Q2 or Q3/Q3 43) give serious monochromatic files (and I honestly didnt like the tinny color of the OG Q at all, or the high contrasty color of the Q2/SL2... but the conversion to black and white was SUPERB on all).

I'm still very curious, I hope to use or own one eventually but it seems for someone like me that does a very good portion of their work in black and white saying I am not sure I will go right out and buy one might say something to someone. You don't need to have the GAS right away. It's okay to sit with what you have, if you have any of the 24MP, 40MP, 47MP or 60MP variant Leicas. You aren't wrong, the black and white rendering IS THAT GOOD on ALL OF THEM.

But yes, I guess I need to test it. OF course I will, and likely make some incredible images with it. Monochrom, to me, is how photography draws – Color is how it FEELS.

 

Also, last thing. In this day and age Content Credentials IS KEY and I am glad this camera has it. I could go on and on on this, but I have already gone on. Rambling man as it were.

Thanking Leica again for giving us this option.

 

Edited November 21 by bilbrown
clarity

[jonoslack]

6 hours ago, SrMi said:

Jono mentions firmware update 4.0, but did not list the changes, as the firmware has not been released yet. If you are as impatient as I am 🤣, you can download Q3M instructions and see the changes.

Well Done!

I haven't read the Q3M instructions and didn't realise the 4.0 changes were in it - but you have just won a Sherlock Holmes medal!

It's all good stuff - but I wasn't quite sure I was supposed to talk about it yet!

All the best

 

[LeicaR10]

Jonoslack,  Thank you for the review.  Just ordered a Q3-M to replace my non-repairable Q2-M damaged climbing Mt Whitney in CA.  r/ Mark

[FocusDot]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thank you for the review, Jono...

You have mentioned Leica Looks - how does that make sense with mono camera?

[S Maclean]

6 hours ago, FocusDot said:

Thank you for the review, Jono...

You have mentioned Leica Looks - how does that make sense with mono camera?

its not the same set as color. the mono have options on sepia, blue, selenium etc

[jonoslack]

18 hours ago, bilbrown said:

This looks like a solid addition. I've owned and used most every Monochrom until the M11-M and now Q3-M. This is a choice however, as I think in 2025 if you shoot black and white primarily you really don't "need" a dedicated monochrome camera. Its just nice and this one is very very premium. There are some use cases, but even then Im not sure.

Let me explain.

 

 

I shoot in almost darkness for a particular project and the 1/2000 at ISO 200,000 sounds wild and usuable since many of my subjects are moving fast. But then the M10-M and Q2M both had this odd morie pattern at ISO 100,000 unless you turned off lens detection in Lightroom and C1 and sometimes that didn't even work. The M11-P has a similar pattern in color and I wonder if anyone has tested it in extreme low light (not just your living room although I am sure its dark), like almost pitch black or color LED lights? Maybe I will do it and report back.

For most things now, I use my M11-P and get basically up to ISO 12,800 or 25,000 and for what I do see no issues. I used to use my SL2-S and various Monocrom cameras for low-low-light and yes, things were sharper up to the 40MP of the M10M and 47 of the Q2M, but the 60MP of the M11/SL3/Q3 variant sensor is more than adequate to get insane sharpness even with the bayer color filter layers up to a pretty high ISO. For anything else I will add my own light or use flash.

I assume the highlights in the Q3M once gone are gone like all of the non-bayer color filter cameras. I guess there is nothing we can do about that. Sometimes and in some scenerios you need those highlights. I have learnt this the hard way more than once. Sure, I dial it down or push down the EC a stop or two, but its still rather annoying to not have a shot because the whites have ZERO information in them. Film doesn't even do that.

 

 

That said, yes of COURSE I want one...

There is something about these monochrom digital cameras that make them "spiritually" a LEICA. I miss my Mono cameras. Its WILD to tell people that it is a digital camera that ONLY shoots in black and white and get their reaction. That has opened a lot of conversations and opportunities. I love that the branding is still stealth like the Q2M and I love the addtion of the screen profiles changing per profile (although I usually stuck to one but occasionally!!).

I don't need it. I know I don't need it. But sometimes you make the best images with something that forces you to do something that you don't absolutely need to do, right.

I love that the Monochrom is now a line, with both a M and Q variant (maybe the much hoped for SL or an EV variant on the horizon!). I think the Q is phenominal and although I sold my Q2M to fund my M11P years ago, I kept my quite destroyed OG Q (Typ 106) that everyone would borrow, from my friends and assistants to my family and honestly if I go through my even recent catalogs and look to see what cameras are giving me the best images it would be my M11-P and Q, not even the Q2M. The Q2M was very good and very used, but the color Q (and I assume Q2 or Q3/Q3 43) give serious monochromatic files (and I honestly didnt like the tinny color of the OG Q at all, or the high contrasty color of the Q2/SL2... but the conversion to black and white was SUPERB on all).

I'm still very curious, I hope to use or own one eventually but it seems for someone like me that does a very good portion of their work in black and white saying I am not sure I will go right out and buy one might say something to someone. You don't need to have the GAS right away. It's okay to sit with what you have, if you have any of the 24MP, 40MP, 47MP or 60MP variant Leicas. You aren't wrong, the black and white rendering IS THAT GOOD on ALL OF THEM.

But yes, I guess I need to test it. OF course I will, and likely make some incredible images with it. Monochrom, to me, is how photography draws – Color is how it FEELS.

 

Also, last thing. In this day and age Content Credentials IS KEY and I am glad this camera has it. I could go on and on on this, but I have already gone on. Rambling man as it were.

Thanking Leica again for giving us this option.

 

Hi There Bill

I think you sum it all up well . . . . I also feel that Monochrom sensors aren't quite as important as they were - the extra resolution and High ISO was very important with the M9M but is now just quite important!

best

 

[jonoslack]

9 hours ago, FocusDot said:

Thank you for the review, Jono...

You have mentioned Leica Looks - how does that make sense with mono camera?

I'm ashamed to say I'm not sure that for me Leica Looks makes a lot of sense for any camera! but the default looks are Mono Natural / Selenium / Sepia or Blue ( there are probably more to download in FOTOS). 

[mpauliks]

vor 3 Minuten schrieb jonoslack:

here are probably more to download in FOTOS). 

not sure on this Jono... BTW Great review again!

[PeterD]

On 11/20/2025 at 2:00 PM, jonoslack said:

Leica Q3 Monochrom - A Jonathan Slack Review

The Q system was a big risk for Leica. When they introduced the original Q in 2015, it was a time when most other manufacturers were abandoning ‘compact’ cameras. Fortunately for Leica it proved to be a phenomenal success, both critically, and in terms of sales.

The original Q was succeeded by the Q2 four years later in March 2019 with a Monochrom version appearing 18 afterwards in November 2020. Of course there have also been a number of special editions over the years.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Loutro
Leica Q3M 1/400 f8 ISO 200

Four years after the Q2 launch the Q3 was released in May 2023, with a number of significant upgrades (more about that later).

Having spent a lot of time saying that 28mm was the perfect focal length for such a camera, Leica finally cracked in September 2024 and bought out the Q3 43 with a wonderful new 43 mm lens (reflecting as closely as possible the focal length of the human eye). I have fallen head over heels in love with the Q3 43 and bought one for myself shortly after the launch.

Brewing. Up a Cretan storm
Leica Q3M 1/12000 f5 ISO 200

 

Changes from the Q2M

• New 60mp BSI Back Illuminated CMOS Sensor (similar to M11 Monochrom)
• USB-C and Mini HDMI connectors
• Tilting LCD
• Improved Bluetooth and WiFi
• Small, Medium and full sized DNG and/or JPG files 60,3, 36.5, 18.6 mp
• Reliable Geotagging in conjunction with Leica Fotos
• Rear Button Layout change
• Long exposures possible (with any combination of ISO and shutter speed) Long Exposure NR can be disabled.
• One additional function button (arguably!)
• USB-C Charging
• Optional Grip enabling WiFi charging
• Better resolution EVF 5,760,000 dots magnification 0.79
• Better resolution Display 3" 1,843,200 dot
• Digital Zoom now has 28, 35, 50, 75 and 90mm framelines
• Leica Looks

Brewing. Up a Suffolk storm
Leica Q3M 1/6400 f5 ISO 200

I went into a lot of detail on these changes in my article on the Q3 when it first came out, I would refer you back to this, but in retrospect I’m a great deal more ‘onboard’ with what Leica are doing than I was then.

In my defence, when I wrote about the Q3 I had not seen the SL3, and the incorporation of a tilting rear LCD and the shift of the buttons to the right of the display have been mirrored in the SL3.

The Imbros Gorge
Leica Q3M 1/200 f6.ISO 200

The SL3 demonstrates a much more advanced interface where all the functions in the quick screen can be customised, more than that they can be saved to individual user profiles. At first I was sad that this excellent new interface was not reflected in the Q3, but in fact the Q3M does have the same interface as the SL3.

In the near future there will be a new firmware update for all the Q3 family (version 4) which will make it completely in line with the SL3 family (more about that later - but not in this article).

 

Emma
Leica Q3M 1/60 f3.5 ISO 1000

Fogou
Leica Q3M 1/25 f1.7 ISO 12500

 

The Body

The body is lovely - Leica have removed the red dot and all the writing on the camera is either grey or white., it certainly looks handsome.

The tilting LCD has been very nicely implemented, so that if you pull out the LCD it immediately switches on and off again when you push it back.

There is a new port on the left hand side of the camera (looking from the rear) housing a USB-C port and a mini HDMI port. This allows the camera to be charged via USB-C as well as fast access to your computer (via Mass Storage) or to Leica Fotos on your device.

The Leica Q3M
Leica SL3 28-70 Vario Elmarit
Strap by Rock n Roll Straps - Century M
@ 70mm 1/200 f8 ISO 100

The Rear button layout has been changed from the Q2 and Q2 M in the same way as it has for the Leica SL3, so that the 3 buttons on the left hand side of the body have been reduced to 2 buttons (just play and menu) and moved to the right hand side of the screen. There is a new function button at the top of the back plate which makes up for the lost one, and this has the added advantage of being able to be configured any way you want.

Q3 (left Q2 (right)

The Sensor

The new sensor is fundamentally the same as the one in the M11 Monochrom and similar to those in the Q3 and the SL3 (but without the Bayer Filter.)

The only downside of the new sensor is that it has a slower readout time than the one on the Q2, This will result in more of a ‘rolling shutter’ effect when using the electronic viewfinder, it also results in a slightly longer blackout time between shots when you fire quickly. For most people this will. be something they don't even notice, but for someone who shoots bursts of photos it might be an issue

Leicas are not the only toys
Leica Q3M 1/1600 f1.7 .ISO 200

The SL3 and the Q3 have Phase Detect points on the sensor which improves the auto-focus over the previous models. Generally speaking contrast detect is more accurate, but phase detect AF is directional, which makes it faster.

On sensor PDAF Pixels do not have colour filters (even on colour sensors) but they are partly covered so that they only receive light from one direction. Cameras with a colour sensor use a Bayer filter and then a demosaicing algorithm which interpolates information to get colour. This demosaicing function can also interpolate data so that the PDAF pixels do not show up.

Celtic Cross
Leica Q3M 1/90 f3.5 .ISO 200

A monochrome sensor does not have a Bayer filter, and does not do any interpolation or demosaicing: each pixel on the sensor is directly represented on the image. The result of this is that if there were PDAF points on the monochrome sensor you would be able to see them (or the pattern they made) in the final image.

Of course the Monochrom cameras do have a defect pixel map and you might think that you could simply add the PDAF points to this, but there is a problem with the amount of memory allocated to defect pixels (not so many) whereas there is a relatively much larger number of PDAF points).

Celtic Mist
Leica Q3M 1/160 f1.7 .ISO 200

Of course, like everything, this could be done - but it would require new algorithms and possibly hardware changes which would be time consuming and therefore expensive.

More to the point, in many situations the Q3 relies more on contrast detect, which is more accurate, so, despite concentrating very hard I didn’t find any slowdown in the AF on the Q3M vs my Q3 43.

New Algorithms
Leica Q3M 1/125 f1.7 .ISO 200

Image Quality

With a colour camera and it’s Bayer filter groups of 4 pixels are demosaiced and interpolated creating 4 colour pixels. So, theoretically you might think that a Monochrom sensor without a Bayer filter, and where each pixel is represented by itself would have 4 times the resolution.

This isn’t actually the case, because the colour demosaicing algorithm really is very good these days, but still the actual resolution on the Q3M (and the M11 M) is a noticeable step up from the colour versions of the same sensor

Heading for the Sea
Leica Q3M 1/320 f5.6 .ISO 200

With Monochrome sensors, despite an even more extended dynamic range, you can’t recover highlight information so easily, so it’s important to make sure you don’t over-expose. This is because when recovering ‘blown' highlights in a colour image you can utilise colour information in different channels. But with a monochrome sensor there is only luminance.

Heading for the Beach
Leica Q3M 1/200 f9 .ISO 200

Low Light Quality

When I was testing the Q2 M in 2020 I was very impressed with the high ISO performance, later on, when the Q3 came out I did more tests. Sadly I no longer have the Q2 Monochrom or the Q3 (inexcusably Leica want their cameras back! ). But I do have the test images, which were mostly taken in our dark living room in poor light (which shows up the worst problems).

So I took the same pictures with the Q3M (some of the books had been moved, but clearly not enough of them!). I was actually really surprised by just how much better the high ISO is compared to the standard Q3 - it feels like nearly 2 stops.

 

ISO 100

ISO 3,200

 

ISO 12,500

ISO 50,000

 

I think what really says it all is this shot at 200,000 ISO, - there is no visible banding, the grain looks natural and good, and even at 100% there is bags of detail. Of course you could also use modern tools to get rid of the grain if you wanted to.

In practical terms this is perhaps even more awe inspiring - the image at 100 ISO and f4 was a 1 second exposure, whereas the one at 200,000 ISO, is 1/2000 of a second at f4, this is a dark room, and still one has huge headway in terms of shutter speed or exposure.

The Serpentine Bookcase
Leica Q3M 1/2000 f4 .ISO 200,000

100% crop of above image
Leica Q3M 1/2000 f4 .ISO 200,000

The Spectral Response

I dealt with this in some detail in my review of the M11 Monochrom. I also dug out Emma’s RGB Buckets (and yellow) to have a look with the Q3M.

It seems to me that the response is pretty much the same as the M11M with a rather bright blue. I checked this with Leica and they said that whilst the sensor is the same, the image pipeline is different, so they couldn’t guarantee there wouldn't be some slight difference. Of course you can change this in the traditional way with filters to suit your requirements.

Content Credentials

Leica has partnered with the Content Authenticity Initiative and the Q3 M is the first of the Q cameras to have this standard integrated into the camera. This is hardware related, so it can’t be added later with a firmware upgrade.

The Leica M11-P was the first camera to have Content Credentials, which adds a digital signature to each image.

Baby Parasol
Leica Q3M 1/640 f5 .ISO 200

The Content Authenticity Initiative (CAI) is an association founded in November 2019 by Adobe, the New York Times, Twitter and others with the intention of curbing disinformation. The idea is to promote an industry standard for provenance metadata for files defined by the C2PA and for promotion of the standard.

 

Concentration
Leica Q3M 1/4000 f1.7 .ISO 200

Anthropomorphism
Leica Q3M 1/6400 f1.7 .ISO 200

 

‍The C2Pa is the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity, co-founded by Adobe with arm, the BBC, Intel and Microsoft and many more, as you can see, big guns are involved in this!

Whilst the C2PA is tasked with the formulation of an open, royalty-free technical standard for metadata, the CAI sees it's task in the dissemination.

I wrote about this at some length in my M11-P article.

A Nest of Stones
Leica Q3M 1/6400 f5.6 .ISO 200

Conclusion

With the exception of PDAF auto-focusing the Q3M has all the advantages of the Q3 over the Q2, and in actual shooting this really doesn’t seem to be an issue - autofocusing is fast and accurate. This may be in part because Leica have been working hard using AI to maximise the AF potential of the Q3.

The Q3M is the first Q camera to use the new version 4 firmware, and this has a host of new and improved features which will also come to the Q3 and Q3 43 in the near future (I’ll talk more about them then).

Pednvounder looking North East
Leica Q3M 1/6400 f8 .ISO 200

But there is something else here - the image quality really does seem to have undergone a bit of a leap; being able to shoot at any aperture with a decent shutter speed in nearly dark rooms has crept up on us slowly, but now it does seem to be a good option with the Q3 MONO (the 1/2000 at 200,000 ISO shot still blows my mind!). It’s something that must populate film photographers dreams.

Of course it isn’t for everyone (like all the Monochrom cameras). But if you only want black and white, then the Q3 MONO is a really classy option. The possibility to crop digitally and still get a great file (even down to 90mm) makes it an incredibly versatile solution to almost any photographic situation. More than that the image files are just a pleasure to process.

Pednvounder looking South West
Leica Q3M 1/320 f8 .ISO 200

Acknowledgements and Links

Special thanks to the guys at Leica who help so much with this, particularly Stefan Daniel and Peter Kruschewski,

Extra special thanks to Matthias Petzke at Leica, who has really gone beyond the call of duty in helping me over the the technical aspects of this article.

If you want to look at any of the previous articles about Q cameras or Monochroms, then they are all available on my website.

My old friend Sean Reid has been a little delayed, but he will be publishing a series of articles about the Q3 Monochrom, Q3, M11 Monochrom and Fujifilm GFD100RF.

 

Wetzlar Swerve
Leica Q3M 1/60 f5.6 ISO 200

Safety
Leica Q3M 1/160 f5.6 ISO 200

 

The Lane to Starve Lark Meadow
Leica Q3M 1/160 f5 ISO 200 28mm

The Lane to Starve Lark Meadow
Leica Q3M 1/120 f5 ISO 200 35mm digital crop

The Lane to Starve Lark Meadow
Leica Q3M 1/100 f5 ISO 200 50mm digital crop

The Lane to Starve Lark Meadow
Leica Q3M 1/100 f5 ISO 200 75mm digital crop

The Lane to Starve Lark Meadow
Leica Q3M 1/100 f5 ISO 200 90mm digital crop

 

Jono,

 

fascinating and great photos but at this price point why wouldn't I go the whole hog and get an M Monochrom, use my existing M lenses and have the additional flexibility?

Just trying to work it all out 🙂

[jonoslack]

16 hours ago, PeterD said:

Jono,

 

fascinating and great photos but at this price point why wouldn't I go the whole hog and get an M Monochrom, use my existing M lenses and have the additional flexibility?

Just trying to work it all out 🙂

Will, if I was in your position that's certainly what I would do . . . . or possibly just an M which will give you the possibility of colour as well!

[PeterD]

Thanks, Jono. 90% of my output is in B&W, even if I convert first from colour, Hence a Monochrom.

 

Peter

[jonoslack]

1 hour ago, PeterD said:

Thanks, Jono. 90% of my output is in B&W, even if I convert first from colour, Hence a Monochrom.

 

Peter

Well Peter - if you have existing M lenses (not everyone does of course) then get the Monochrom (especially if you prefer a rangefinder!)

 

[S Maclean]

2 hours ago, PeterD said:

Thanks, Jono. 90% of my output is in B&W, even if I convert first from colour, Hence a Monochrom.

 

Peter

I share your position.  I got the m Monochrom and it really blowed my mind.  Even though I had my reservations since my M11 was already a high performer. That said, best, most effortless pics I’ve taken are with the m11m.

And then I got a Q343 and I found that some days where I felt uncomplicated, or light travel or challenging weather etc it is a joy to carry and work with….. so guessing i will find the same difference in IQ between Q3 and Q3M than I do between the M’s I just can’t resist the Q3Mono  because I can cover 28,35 and 50 with supreme quality and IQ plus IBIS and simplicity. 
 

so. Two m’s and 2 q’s. I am spoiled, but happy. 

[Patrick NL]

Overall a nice review, but the choice of the photos is not so convincing to me. Black and white, I love it, ask for other subjects for me. I miss street, portraits, nights in streets, etc. Landscapes, a forest, not subjects I would bring a monochrom to myself...

I do not see myself buy one because I love the Q3 already so much and the black and white conversion with the files from that camera are already very, very  good. Easier/better than files from my Nikon Zf and Z8. And two cameras with a fixed 28 with only a different sensor is not an investment I would make. If I would not have my Q3 and would buy my first Q, this monochrom version would be very tempting, also because I shoot Nikon and the occasional Fujifilm X next to it.

[shopaholic]

Can someone post pictures of Q3 M and Q3 shot in monochrome? Mere mortals would like to see the differences. Thanks 

[hoolyproductions]

On 11/20/2025 at 4:20 PM, LocalHero1953 said:

Looking forward to the v4 firmware though - I like the SL3-S menu screens customisable by profile, and it will be good to have the same on the Q.

I am unreasonably excited about this! Universal menu system on all my cameras, and I really prefer the SL3 menu (screenshot from the Phoblographer review)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[Advertisement]

Hallo,

Look here: Leica Q

[adametheridge]

Have done a very quick side-by-side Q2M vs Q3 43 vs Q3M autofocus test... and on first look I'd say the Q3M face/eye detection is actually better / more accurate than the Q3 43 (and considerably better than the Q2M).

Which was a pleasant surprise. 

Probably a firmware thing.