jonoslack Posted 15 hours ago Share #41 Posted 15 hours ago Advertisement (gone after registration) 4 hours ago, Anonautico said: Don't tell Leica, because the Q43 with lens costs less than the best Leica optics, which Leica considers to be the best optics. 🙄 Leica knows. Just look at the MTF charts! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Hi jonoslack, Take a look here Q3 43 or M-EV1: Trying to make best decision as senior with vision issue. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
lencap Posted 10 hours ago Author Share #42 Posted 10 hours ago Apologies for the radio silence—I've been traveling a bit, but given the continued commentary here, I want to update my thoughts. Thanks to everyone for the comments; they're all genuinely helpful and welcome. And a special shout-out to Jono. Your ability to articulate the full creative experience (the image, the art) with each Leica platform is why I've bought SL, Q, and M bodies/lenses over the years. My local dealer and I both owe you a commission! My Journey to 'The ONE' As a hobbyist for over six decades, I'm squarely in the full-frame camp (after enjoying everything from film Hasselblads and Nikon Fs to the "latest and greatest" digitals). But Father Time always wins: aging eyes made critical rangefinder focus and parallax alignment tricky. This realization is what drove my interest in the Q line, starting with the Q-116. While I loved the quality, I never fully bonded with the 28mm FL. This led me to the SL/SL2-S (with SL primes and the 24-90 zoom). I recently consolidated and chose the Q3 43 as 'The ONE', as the weight/size resulted in leaving the SL kit at home more often than taking it with me. Why the Q3 43 Works - For ME Why the Q3 43? Simple: looking back at 60 years of my photos, the vast majority are 50mm shots focusing on emotion and candid portraiture in available light. The 43mm FL is ideal for capturing faces with minimal distortion (and the optimized APO lens is a bonus). The Q3 43 checks every box for a true one-camera solution: magical output, macro option, fine manual focus and zone focusing, and a small footprint/weight. For wider/longer shots, I'll let my iPhone 14 Pro handle the task for now (I know, not an ideal solution, but it works). Yes, I do miss the M Rangefinder experience, but reality has a way of focusing (pun intended) on solutions, not fondly insisting on tradition and heritage. Thanks again to this forum; you were instrumental in helping me navigate this maze of choices! Now, I just need Jono to stop writing such wonderful Leica reviews before he moves me to another solution! 😉 Be well, everyone. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now