Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

SL2S Summilux M 24

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

x

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jaapv said:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

The miniaturised instrumentation left an impression with me. Further, it looked like every part on the interior of the aircraft had been uniquely customised, shrunk and lightened; the design cost must have been staggering.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The initial development estimate for Concorde was $130 million. However, this was vastly exceeded by the final cost reaching over $2.8 billion. In the 1960/70-ies, mind you. Today, it would have been $23.5 billion... Each of the British and French governments funded $1.44 billion. These costs were mostly written off and never recovered. Only twenty of the estimated 350 aircraft were ever built. 

I had seen this aircraft before, I happened to be transiting at Heathrow when it took off for one of its final commercial flights in October 2003.  There is one other personal connection: Patricia's father and uncle were on the design team of its Olympus engines. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jaapv said:

Patricia's father and uncle were on the design team of its Olympus engines.

That would be these...nice job!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting difference in the principle of the engines. The Pratt and Whitney used a cone structure to deflect the intake airstream into the afterburners to create a ramjet effect at supersonic speeds whereas Rolls Royce had a three-flap system to slow the intake airflow down to subsonic speeds. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to edit in that the engine shot was M240-P + 50 Lux ASPH.

Had the chance to spend a day via the Bristol Owners club where we combined Filton and Yeovilton so visited the prototype and last example (AFAIK) in the same day, with a talk from a pilot involved in the development/testing.

It was interesting to hear about the changes from the prototype including the lengthening of the body to accommodate enough seats to make it commercially viable and the subsequent changes to the geometry of the wings. I might be mis-remembering but I believe it was the only non-military aircraft sanctioned to use afterburners on takeoff in the UK

Edited by NigelG
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...