different appearance Elmar 35mm f3.5

[Lesoa]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

 

Hello! 

 

I recently acquired a nickel Elmar 35mm f/3.5 and I have a question about it. It seems to be an early version, probably before standardization, and appears to be made for leica Ⅰc, but the barrel design is different. 

At first I thought it might be missing a part of the barrel, but on close inspection there are no signs of disassembly, and it seems to be entirely composed of original parts. Also, looking at past information, I’ve seen serial numbers even earlier than this one (mine is three digits: 457), but those examples don’t seem to show any difference from the usual 35mm f/3.5. 

 

If anyone has information about this particular version, I would greatly appreciate your insights. Thank you!

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[SpotmaticSP]

You have one of the earliest non-standardized 35mm Elmars. The "457" is not its serial number, but the last three digits of the non-standardized Leica camera it was adjusted to.
There's more information to be found in this topic: 

 

[luigi bertolotti]

The most noticeable feature is focus to ,5 mtr, a documented variant of the non standard version (in meter only, afaik)

Edited Tuesday at 08:04 PM by luigi bertolotti

[Lesoa]

10時間前、SpotmaticSPは言った：

最も初期の非標準化された35mmエルマーの1つがあります。「457」はシリアル番号ではなく、調整された非標準化されたライカカメラの下3桁です。
このトピックには、さらに詳しい情報があります。

 

Thank you very much for your response!

 

I see, this lens was made for the Ⅰc with the serial number xx457.

I also found a specimen with the same characteristics (Nr.37380?) in the thread you pointed me to. It is quite interesting that both five-digit and three-digit numbers are mixed.

[Lesoa]

7 hours ago, luigi bertolotti said:

The most noticeable feature is focus to ,5 mtr, a documented variant of the non standard version (in meter only, afaik)

Thank you for your reply!

Since there is no “O” mark at the pin, I believe, as you mentioned, that it is indeed the non-standard version.

[Giuliobigazzi]

This lens most likely was on camera 37457. The first few months of the non standard cameras are confusing, not sequential when it comes to serials. I have 37323 delivered in July 1930.

37380, 37309, 37396 were delivered April May and June and have 5 numbers engraved on the lenses. 
37354 has 3 numbers. 
I bet because of the three numbers, 37457 was delivered July or later, but used an older part of a different design. That, or there were different workers engraving three or five numbers at the same time..

Then there is five number Elmar 39910 which confuses matters more!

i would ask Leica for delivery of 37457 

great find👍

Edited yesterday at 06:32 AM by Giuliobigazzi

[luigi bertolotti]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

4 hours ago, Lesoa said:

Thank you for your reply!

Since there is no “O” mark at the pin, I believe, as you mentioned, that it is indeed the non-standard version.

Yes, surelyy non standard, and the "odd" mount is due to the longer focus helicoid : a very interesting item.

[Giuliobigazzi]

Interesting, this makes sense. So this style mount is not necessarily earlier than the standard one as I was thinking. Just a different variant. 37380 thus must have been a close focus lens too. 

[willeica]

6 hours ago, Giuliobigazzi said:

This lens most likely was on camera 37457. The first few months of the non standard cameras are confusing, not sequential when it comes to serials. I have 37323 delivered in July 1930.

37380, 37309, 37396 were delivered April May and June and have 5 numbers engraved on the lenses. 
37354 has 3 numbers. 
I bet because of the three numbers, 37457 was delivered July or later, but used an older part of a different design. That, or there were different workers engraving three or five numbers at the same time..

Then there is five number Elmar 39910 which confuses matters more!

i would ask Leica for delivery of 37457 

great find👍

I have 37284, the 5th ever Leica with an interchangeable lens done in Wetzlar- there were earlier ones done in the UK, course. My camera has the last 3 digits on the lens. It was shipped on 16th April 1930 and then 'repaired' in Wetzlar 20th September 1930.

I only have a 50mm lens with 284 on it. There may be a 35mm and 135mm lenses 'on the loose' somewhere.

William 

[Giuliobigazzi]

Nice! So maybe the five digit lenses are an anomaly rather than early, maybe an engraver  didn’t get the brief and engraved full serials instead of the last three digits? Or I guess your lens could have been changed to a three digit during the ‘repair’

[willeica]

16 minutes ago, Giuliobigazzi said:

Nice! So maybe the five digit lenses are an anomaly rather than early, maybe an engraver  didn’t get the brief and engraved full serials instead of the last three digits? Or I guess your lens could have been changed to a three digit during the ‘repair’

Possibly the latter. However, looking for consistency in early Leicas can be a fruitless task. I have discussed the consistency aspect with Jim Lager on a number of occasions and he agrees with me. In Britain they showed the whole of the camera serial number on the barrel of the matched Dallmeyer lens. This is an example from my collection

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

William 

 

Edited 17 hours ago by willeica

[Lesoa]

4時間前、Giuliobigazziは言った：

面白い、これは理にかなっている。したがって、このスタイルのマウントは、私が思っていたように、必ずしも標準的なものよりも早いとは限りません。別のバリエーションです。したがって、37380もクローズフォーカスレンズだったに違いありません。

It seems that the presence or absence of the depth-of-field scale engraving on the barrels of No.380 and No.457 was not strictly based on the shipping order, but rather appeared to be mixed.

As you mentioned, it feels reasonable to regard this as one of the variations.

 

It is also interesting that it shares some similarities with the Elmar 50mm f/3.5 found on certain Leica A models.

I really appreciate all the information I’ve been able to learn from everyone here!

[luigi bertolotti]

I'd like to have confirmation (and Jerzy could be the right guy 😎) that the DOF scale of the Elmar 35 is indeed a separate collar, attached (screwed onto ?) to the barrel itself : in case the 457 lens we are speaking of had this collar simply removed (note the the small index at infinity well visible in pic #2... this is a critical positioning to be made when assemblying lens' barrel on mount) , and the 3 digits re-engraved on the "bare" collar : were they, originally, 5 digits ? Who knows... in the old thread linked in post #4 our late friend Pecole published the pic of an Elmar 35 with 5 digits, and a barrel unslanted and no DOF, apparently identical to this 457.  If this lens left the factory as new with the current aspect, or not, is hard to say... but anyway, if modified, was surely done at Leitz lab, and several reasons can be imagined : for instance, a pro user took a Leica Ic with 2-3 lenses including 35 (all matched of course) then , very satisfied, took a second body asking to match his current 35: matching, afaik, was made onto the camera body (shims on lens' mount), and, if the original lens had the collar, the quickiest way was to remove the collar with the previous number and engraving the new one, supposed that the user didn't care much the DOF scale.

Edited 15 hours ago by luigi bertolotti