Leica CL Sensor - is it as good as the SL2-S?

[NightPix]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm seriously considering picking up a CL to use primarily with my M lenses. I want a small kit that's fun to use. I can't use an M rangefinder because of my eyesight. My SL2's are great for work tasks, but just too big and heavy for casual use. The CL gives me the interchangeable lenses that I don't get with my Q3. I love the output of my 24 MP SL2-S with M lenses, and I'm hoping I can get something pretty close from a CL.  I'd appreciate any thoughts on how the images from these camera's might compare when used with M-lenses (low light, colors, dynamic range, noise, etc.). Thanks!

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[KitW]

I don't know how other people feel about it, but I've never enjoyed using manual focus on the CL. This would put me off, rather than concerns about image quality.

[LocalHero1953]

In answer to your thread title question: no. I owned the CL and now own a SL2-S. That doesn't make the CL sensor bad - it just doesn't have the low light noise and colour performance of the SL2-S sensor (without going back through my archive I estimate at least 2 stops difference). I replaced the CL with a Q2, and now Q3 43, but I would still happily use a CL for the same purposes: a light versatile camera for travel and social stuff.