Derbyshire Man Posted May 28 Share #1  Posted May 28 Advertisement (gone after registration) Lots of CV vs summicron but nothing on elmarit, queries are around size, character and resolution at f2.8 or so. Both without hoods. Is one noticeably smaller than the other, any reason to get the slower and more expensive Leica lens? I’ve read around but wonder if anyone has direct experience.  Cheers! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 28 Posted May 28 Hi Derbyshire Man, Take a look here Elmarit 28mm compared with 28mm ultron v2. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
lct Posted May 29 Share #2 Â Posted May 29 I can only compare Elmarit 28/2.8 asph v1 to Ultron 28/2 asph v1 sorry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted May 29 Share #3 Â Posted May 29 If we're talking about the lenses I think we're talking about, then: - The Ultron v2 is a bit bigger and has a kind of tapered, snout-nosed design - The Elmarit ASPH is more pancake-ish and IMO nicer looking on the camera - They are both excellent, the Ultron has a bit more global contrast and acutance - The Elmarit can have a bit of halation wide open at f/2.8 I owned both, eventually settled on the Elmarit and was quite happy with it until I moved to the Summicron, which is my favorite 28mm. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
o2mpx Posted May 29 Share #4 Â Posted May 29 7 minutes ago, JoshuaR said: @JoshuaR...I owned both, eventually settled on the Elmarit and was quite happy with it until I moved to the Summicron, which is my favorite 28mm. Trying to decide on either the Elmarit or Summicron 28mm. Since landscapes is the subject, most if not all will be shot at mid apertures and not wide open. Can you provide some insight as to why the Summicron ended up as your favorite over the Elmarit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted May 29 Share #5 Â Posted May 29 28 minutes ago, o2mpx said: Trying to decide on either the Elmarit or Summicron 28mm. Since landscapes is the subject, most if not all will be shot at mid apertures and not wide open. Can you provide some insight as to why the Summicron ended up as your favorite over the Elmarit? I mainly photograph people, and I found that the Elmarit wasn't too flattering. Whereas the Summicron has something moody and even gentle in its rendering if the light is right. If I were making landscapes, I'd definitely go with the Elmarit. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyshire Man Posted May 29 Author Share #6  Posted May 29 @JoshuaRand how does the summicron compare in size to the ultron? Sounds like the overall answer is sunmicron plus elmarit for Landscapes🤣 I just wonder if by the time I’d got to summicron I’d be thinking maybe as well use the summilux! And then might as well use the Q3 instead.🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted May 29 Share #7  Posted May 29 Advertisement (gone after registration) The Ultron is tinier than the Summicron. It's a very cute, pocketable little lens. But the Elmarit is even smaller. I generally like to keep it to one lens per focal length. So, for me, the Summicron was the best overall compromise, especially because I take so many people pictures. (And because the 28 Lux is past where I'd like to be in terms of size and weight in an everyday lens, which is how I use 28mm—on many days, it's my only lens.) But the Elmarit is an extraordinary little lens. I prefer the Elmarit images to the ones I got from my Q2—the Elmarit just makes extraordinarily vivid pictures, yet with a hint of character. Elmarit + Summicron is a great combination once you understand the rendering differences. But it introduces an element of choice, which I like to avoid. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanillasludge Posted May 29 Share #8  Posted May 29 (edited) I’ve owned the Summicron and currently have the Ultron.  The ultron is a great lens for the price and has much better flare control, but I liked the Summicron better.   Both have loads of vignette but the Summicron was just smoother and more natural.   I won’t go back though, as I’m crap with wide angle lenses and a great one is wasted on me.  Here’s something I did yesterday from the Ultron. https://flic.kr/p/2r7GQFk Edited May 29 by Vanillasludge 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derbyshire Man Posted May 31 Author Share #9  Posted May 31 On 5/29/2025 at 1:10 PM, Vanillasludge said: I’ve owned the Summicron and currently have the Ultron.  The ultron is a great lens for the price and has much better flare control, but I liked the Summicron better.   Both have loads of vignette but the Summicron was just smoother and more natural.   I won’t go back though, as I’m crap with wide angle lenses and a great one is wasted on me.  Here’s something I did yesterday from the Ultron. https://flic.kr/p/2r7GQFk Nice photo and nice Flickr by the way! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now