Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x

There was a comparison to the 35mm apo in a 2024 forum post that may be helpful. 

Leica Miami compared the performance of the Q3 43 lens to the Q3 and the 35mm APO SL and 35mm APO-M. Wide open they are all the same in center. The standard bearer for performance across the Leica line-up, the 35mm APO-Summicron-SL was only slightly sharper in the corners and exhibited less vignetting but surprisingly, the 43mm lens was sharper in the corners than the 35mm APO-M.

 The lens comparison starts at around 1h19m into the video.

https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/413587-comparison-of-new-q3-43-apo-lens-to-35mm-apo-summicron-sl-and-35mm-apo-m-lenses/?do=findComment&comment=5655349

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Leslie22 said:

Sorry , silly me , I'm a 50 shooter ... and I've come to think of the 43 as a 50. What I'm looking for is a comparison between the Q3 43's 43 Apo and the 50 M Apo

Thanks

 

 

 

What’s the purpose of the comparison? What are your suppositions going into the comparison?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2025 at 6:12 AM, darylgo said:

All lenses mentioned excluding the Q 50 are amongst the most technically outstanding.  Excessive imho, the images are improved with negative clarity. 

The Q3 43 default sharpening setting in Capture One is too aggressive: reduce radius slider from 0.8 default to 0.5 + lower sharpening slider to taste (can be reduced substantially depending on the subject). Not sure if Lightroom has the same issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...