Deeetona Posted February 7 Share #1  Posted February 7 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) I can pick up a Vario Elmar R 28-70mm f/3,5-4,5  that has seen better days, for a handful of EUR. What "look" does it produce? 1990s "zoom lens look", whatever that means? I dont own an R body yet but am getting excited about the R6. Edited February 7 by Deeetona Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 7 Posted February 7 Hi Deeetona, Take a look here "look" of the Vario Elmar R 28-70mm f/3,5-4,5. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
250swb Posted February 8 Share #2  Posted February 8 I had one very briefly, and it isn't a bad lens. I wasn't put off by it being a Sigma design (built to Leica standards by Kyocera) but as soon as I started using it I felt the 28mm end wasn't very sharp and it was the wide end that I thought would be useful at the time. The lesson I should have known from using other zooms is the wide end is usually the least sharp and prone to distortion and so it was. If I'd had a 28mm prime I think I'd have carried that around as well. So off it went and I rationalised my camera bag and replaced it with the 21mm-35mm Vario Elmar and the 35mm-70mm, both of which do have 'prime' quality although the 21mm end is still a bit soft. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeetona Posted February 8 Author Share #3 Â Posted February 8 Many thanks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bocaburger Posted February 16 Share #4 Â Posted February 16 I had high hopes for that lens, used it w R bodies (on film) and EOS full-frame digital. Â Sharpness, even at the 28mm end, was not an issue for me compared to the distortion. Â Any straight line within a quarter of the frame from the edges at all focal lengths except in the 35-40mm range had obvious curvature (barrel <35, pincushion >40). Â Walls, columns, doorways, floors, even tree trunks all curved one way or the other. Â Fixable in post but not without eventual cropping. Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_livsey Posted February 19 Share #5 Â Posted February 19 On 2/7/2025 at 10:29 AM, Deeetona said: for a handful of EUR. I think the clue to the quality is encapsulated in those few words, very, very rarely does any Leica equipment present at a "bargain" price unless it has issues. Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidmknoble Posted March 11 Share #6 Â Posted March 11 The 35-70 f/4 is a much better lens and very similar to the Leica M MATE 28-50-35 f/4. Â It is a Leica lens and comes in ROM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
atournas Posted March 14 Share #7  Posted March 14 Advertisement (gone after registration) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! That was shot with the lens in discussion on an R7. Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! That was shot with the lens in discussion on an R7. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/419112-look-of-the-vario-elmar-r-28-70mm-f35-45/?do=findComment&comment=5771961'>More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now