wparsonsgisnet Posted August 26, 2006 Share #1 Posted August 26, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am thinking about the wide lens I want to go with the M8. Puts is crazy about the 24mm f2.8 asph and I think that's the way I want to go. Would users of this lens tell me about it and also compare to the 28mm lenses please (both f2.0 asph and 2.8 asph). tnx, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 26, 2006 Posted August 26, 2006 Hi wparsonsgisnet, Take a look here 24mm f2.8 users please tell me about your lens. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
lambroving Posted August 27, 2006 Share #2 Posted August 27, 2006 Wait until Photokina. Then ask. Trust me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicapfile Posted August 27, 2006 Share #3 Posted August 27, 2006 Bill, Don't know squat about MTF charts/graphs, or what you're regular shooting regimine is. Do know that if I had to cull down to two lenses the 24 (along with the 50DR) would be ones that I would keep. Obviously it isn't fast, nor compact, and requires an aux finder (I shoot with 0.85 mag). That said it is sharp as a tack, and I marvel at the lack of distortion it has. I suspect it will become a very popular lens for those who will get M8s given the crop factor. I can't compare it to any of the 28s, as I only have a Tri-Elmar that has that focal length. As handy as that lens is, I'm certain any prime 28 Leica makes is better. Don't know where you're at, but try to get a loaner/rental and shoot a couple of rolls with it. Best, Jerry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted August 27, 2006 Share #4 Posted August 27, 2006 Well, of course, I've just bought one solely on the assumption the M8 will go down to 24 but no further without an aux finder. Only just got it but a few test shots before it goes back to Mutter for coding confirms it's a cracker, but so too is the 28/2. Usual excellent mechanics. Andy advised me to wait (too late by that time, LOL) and now William is doing the same to you. Maybe there's some inside info which we don't know about, things like the actual framelines and new lens offerings. A 28/2.8 and something ultra-wide seem likely, but Leica may yet surprise us by going faster as well as wider, something like a 28/1.4... I'd be surprised though if Leica were to introduce more than a couple of new lenses given everything else they're doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k_g_wolf ✝ Posted August 27, 2006 Share #5 Posted August 27, 2006 I´am sure you know the rumour about a new TRI-Elmar-M 16-18-21 mm by now. Considering the 1.33- cropfactor this lens will be good for 21-24-28 mm focal-length-equivalents on the M8 ... So wait a few weeks and think about a new lens then. Best Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
waileong Posted August 27, 2006 Share #6 Posted August 27, 2006 It's very good. Apart from that, the rest can be found from MTF charts and Puts' reviews. It's big, though-- 55 mm filter size. My only comparison was my 28/1.9 Ultron asph, which was obviously much lower build quality. Wai Leong === I am thinking about the wide lens I want to go with the M8. Puts is crazy about the 24mm f2.8 asph and I think that's the way I want to go. Would users of this lens tell me about it and also compare to the 28mm lenses please (both f2.0 asph and 2.8 asph). tnx, Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardinal Posted August 27, 2006 Share #7 Posted August 27, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I used to have the 28 summicron and I did not like the lens for as handling goes. When the shade was mounted on the lens it was somewhat loose and awkward and too big for a 28. Now the performance is great, bar none but I just did not like the egronomics of it. For me it just was not wide enough so I sold it and got the 24 instead. If Leica comes out with a 28 Elmarit asph and is a little smaller than the 28 cron, I would buy it. I would still keep my 24 though. I saw several used 24's on sale on Ebay but I kind of wonder why. The shade on the 24 is the right size and fits very well on the lens so and other things I like the egronomics of the 24 over the 28 summicron. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted August 27, 2006 Share #8 Posted August 27, 2006 ...When the shade was mounted on the lens it was somewhat loose and awkward and too big for a 28... Reason why i use the 35/1.4asph shade with the R-D1. I expect no problem on the M8 either given the crop factor (28 x 1.33 = 37mm FoV). FWIW Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rosuna Posted August 27, 2006 Share #9 Posted August 27, 2006 I would like to see new chrome versions of the 28/2 and the 35/1.4. The problem of a M8 Chrome is the few chrome lenses in Leica's catalogue. How good is the 35/1.4 in the R-D1 LCT? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbesz Posted August 27, 2006 Share #10 Posted August 27, 2006 Wait until Photokina. Then ask. Trust me. So who have you been speaking with? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
like_no_other Posted August 27, 2006 Share #11 Posted August 27, 2006 I saw a pic on the web with a 24/2.0 if i can trust my eyes it could be digital optimized Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunsworth Posted August 27, 2006 Share #12 Posted August 27, 2006 Hi William, I'm assuming that the reference is to the the new wide angle Tri-Elmar that's been hinted at on various websites - if William knows for sure he won't be able to comment because of the NDA - sounds like it could be a very interesting Photokina :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbesz Posted August 28, 2006 Share #13 Posted August 28, 2006 Hi William, I'm assuming that the reference is to the the new wide angle Tri-Elmar that's been hinted at on various websites - if William knows for sure he won't be able to comment because of the NDA - sounds like it could be a very interesting Photokina :-) Thanks Steve, yes I understand, ..save your money for later :-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted August 28, 2006 Share #14 Posted August 28, 2006 Picture of it and the finder on RFF... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_reid Posted August 28, 2006 Share #15 Posted August 28, 2006 Hi Bill, I'm sure that you've read my review of the 24/2.8 already but I like it a lot and recommend it. Best, Sean Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christoph_d Posted August 28, 2006 Share #16 Posted August 28, 2006 Hi Bill, The 2,8/24 Asph. is a phantastic lens. It's biting sharp even at open aperture, has superb performance wrt. vignetting and colour rendering and also mechanically is top. To me it compares directly with the much praised 1.4/50 Asph. I have never used a 2/28, but hear that this lenses performance also is stunningly good. Look at Stefan Pragers Cuba Photos in the german forum for picture examples. Kind regards, C. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wparsonsgisnet Posted August 28, 2006 Author Share #17 Posted August 28, 2006 Well, I should have mentioned Sean Reid's review as well, because that is where I noticed the images that set the 24mm lens apart, and Sean and I have traded emails about the lens. If you are not subscribing to Sean's site, you are missing an important point of view and a great deal of information. Not only are the reviews clear and informative, they are accompanied by shots that make clear exactly what the lenses being reviewed can do. It's just like I borrowed the lenses and spent a zillion hours testing them and then was able to make an informed decision -- except that I don't have to do all that work. The images are right there with thoroughly written and understandable text. It has been suggested to me that a new 28mm lens is on the way, and I am told that the price will be extremely friendly, but I keep seeing the images on Sean's site that were taken with the 24mm lens. Also, if the widest frameline is to be 24, and Putz raves about this lens (his words are something like "the single most important lens for an M user to own"), and the pix look like the images that Sean shows, why fight it. I am pleased to see the responses from owners of the 24. I will also heed the advice of several of you to wait. After all, Leica is entering the modern world and they may be beginning to use the same smoke and mirrors that American manufacturers do. So-called upcoming lenses may be ruses for something else entirely. They are certainly whetting everyone's appetites. In my case, the whetting is confusing and I will tell my dealer that I want only a body and I'll wait to see the whites of their lenses. This is to say that I'm a little pissed off. I am putting away money to SPEND on Leica equipment (Solms, I hope you're reading this!), and I don't know what to expect. So, I will NOT buy something (in this case a lens) and will wait to see what appears. I would much prefer it if Leica told us what they are planning so I could make an informed decision. Not to be too cynical: during the past several years while they weren't doing much of anything except dribbling out Panasonic cameras with worthwhile lens designs, they told us all kinds of things. And here we are, The Faithful, with no place to go to kickk the tires (there is no Leica store except in Tokyo -- it is open yet?). If it weren't for this site (thankyou again, Andreas), we'd be in a pickle. It clearly looks like they have gotten the M8 right -- we have corroboration from several sources of big prints with astonishing detail and Leica-ness. That alone is enough for them to make a big enough splash. The problem with keeping things under wraps is that the unveiling is likely to end up being anticlimactic. How Hollywood it is. I am clearly wetting my pants waiting for the M8. I was also ready to spring for a wide lens. Now, I'll wait (and I'm not happy, in case that wasn't clear). Bill Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted August 28, 2006 Share #18 Posted August 28, 2006 Good comments, Bill. I understand they don't want a repeat if the DMR experience but the flip side is that nobody does anything because they don't know what's coming. Leica users deserve a road map on which to base their buying decisions. Right now, I believe a 24 is a sensible buying decision, I went with it, but may yet be proved wrong. The leaked announcement memo headlined with the camera, the Tri-Elmar, the 28mm Elmarit ASPH and the "Universal" finder but also discussed accessories which I assume will include things like cases, flash-guns, battery packs and so on. We'll see, 15 September cannot come a day too soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertwang Posted August 28, 2006 Share #19 Posted August 28, 2006 I have the 24mm in R mount and it feel solid. Very well done. Of course, I hope to test it on the E300 body this week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grober Posted August 29, 2006 Share #20 Posted August 29, 2006 Whenever I shoot with my 25 Biogon, I always finish with a big smile on! -g Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.