Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

As a quick update on the Wotancraft 2L, I just came back from my first overseas trip with it and it ended up being pretty much a perfect day bag for me. I packed in an M11 with a 35 Steel Rim, the 90 macro-elmar, and the Leica Macro Adapter in the main compartment (I cut up one of my old foam dividers to create another shelf to stack the macro adapter and the spare lens on top of each other). On the sides, I attached a couple of the modules - one with a VND + CPL filter and one with the Really Right Stuff Pocket Tripod and BC-18 ballhead. The strap is extremely comfortable for all day wear. I like that the bag is small as it avoids me overpacking and doesn't get heavy.

For a hike I took, I decided to use my travel backpack (which the 2L fits into) - the WANDRD PRVKE Lite, which was perfect (although lot of space left over for this kit). The nice thing about the Wotancraft system is I can detach the side modules for an even smaller carry - or as a handy way to transfer those accessories into the WANDRD backpack.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by TheEyesHaveIt
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2024 at 11:19 AM, charlesphoto99 said:

The Wotoncraft Pilot sling bags are hands down one of the best bags you can get imo (and I have the Hadley's, Peaks, Think Tanks, etc). Probably the 3.5L might be what you are after, though the 2L is worth a look too. I currently have a 7L with a 2L on the way. 

Can vouch for Wotancraft. Got an older Easy Rider. Perfect for a single-lens setup. Great quality and designs. Not your boring kind of cam bags.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TheEyesHaveIt said:

As a quick update on the Wotancraft 2L, I just came back from my first overseas trip with it and it ended up being pretty much a perfect day bag for me. I packed in an M11 with a 35 Steel Rim, the 90 macro-elmar, and the Leica Macro Adapter in the main compartment (I cut up one of my old foam dividers to create another shelf to stack the macro adapter and the spare lens on top of each other). On the sides, I attached a couple of the modules - one with a VND + CPL filter and one with the Really Right Stuff Pocket Tripod and BC-18 ballhead. The strap is extremely comfortable for all day wear. I like that the bag is small as it avoids me overpacking and doesn't get heavy.

For a hike I took, I decided to use my travel backpack (which the 2L fits into) - the WANDRD PRVKE Lite, which was perfect (although lot of space left over for this kit). The nice thing about the Wotancraft system is I can detach the side modules for an even smaller carry - or as a handy way to transfer those accessories into the WANDRD backpack.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Totally agree with your assessment. I jus spent a week working out of the 3.5l version. Perfect for a body, 2 lenses and some accessories. I'm a tad disappointed with the outer pockets; you're not carrying much more than a notepad in them because they don't expand out much. The strap adjustability is the best. Not sure why no other company has thought of it. As you mention, if you remove the strap and any add-on pockets, the bag easily stashes inside a knapsack. So I feel like I got two bags for one: a small sling bag to shoot out of, and a padded insert that I can slide into my knapsack when I want to carry backpack-style.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Pixeleater said:

I use the Wotoncraft 2L with an M10R and a 50lux and don’t have room for much else. Same with the 35 APO. 

I'm surprised since my M11 + 50 Lux fits into the 2L and still leaves me room on the side of another lens (90 macro-elmar or 35 Lux or similar size). It's tight, but it does fit. I have however provided feedback to Wotancraft that they need a 2.5L Pilot. The jump from 2L to 3.5L is too big IMO.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Al Brown said:

My smaller Ona Brooklyn has been through so much with me for the past 6 years it got the honorary title - among its great siblings Domke, Billingham, Peak Design, Tenba and Leica's own Japanese bag below - of my favorite small bag for M system. No issues whatsoever due to any manufacturer error. I have not heard of any ONA problems lately. Looks like 1940s school bag, all leather exterior and black.

My favorite large bag for Leica (it was originally made for S/SL) is the unique and exclusive  Leica Professional Store Tokyo camera bag. The GInza folks really put their thinking cap on. Red interior and cowhide combined with synthetic suede make a great daily carry.

I have the exact same ONA Brooklyn satchel bag. It's all right, and with the right style, there's nothing more functional and fashionable around. But for everyday hardships, there is no better friend than my old and tattered DOMKE F-803 bag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

14 minutes ago, TheEyesHaveIt said:

I'm surprised since my M11 + 50 Lux fits into the 2L and still leaves me room on the side of another lens (90 macro-elmar or 35 Lux or similar size). It's tight, but it does fit. I have however provided feedback to Wotancraft that they need a 2.5L Pilot. The jump from 2L to 3.5L is too big IMO.

Here is an image of my recent setup in the 2L. If I want quick and easy access I only have the M10R and attached lens. The body is pressed against one side and space between the end of the 50lux is @ 1 3/8". I have the Leica thumb support attached and an ADM half case which together affects capacity. The body tilts to the lens side but it helps me grab the camera.

 

The 2.5L is a nice compromise and would work for me as well.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Al Brown said:

Did that strap ring start to scratch the camera body yet?

In use for several years and no wear marks or scratches. The ADM half case Tap & Dye hand strap prohibit any metal to metal contact.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Pixeleater
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 8/3/2024 at 1:03 PM, Bobonli said:

Question for the Wotancraft Clan: is there a method to carry a water bottle on the 3.5l ? I know there are side pockets on the 7 but suspect it’s more bag than I need. 
 

My usual kit is 1 M body with 35 or 50, small pouch for batteries/filters/cleaning, sometimes the circ polarizer, film, small flash, notebook. I think that would fit nicely in the 3.5 but I also like to have a water bottle with me for longer walks. 

I have a second M on the way so maybe I’d carry both which might press the capacity of the 3.5l but still think the 7l might be bigger than I’d want to carry for a longer period. I currently use a non-descript knapsack with wraps for padding but it’s not exactly convenient when I want to swap lenses or grab film or the flash. Not a huge fan of zippers, and most of the bags mentioned in this thread scream “expensive camera”

Answering my own question and hopefully helping others. I stumbled across this Yeti Tubmber Sling, that also happens to have Molle clips. It works perfectly to attach a water bottle holder to the side of the 3.5l Wotoncraft bag. And it does not protrude beyond the height of the bag. Comes with a strap so you can carry your bottle separately over your shoulder if you like, 

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I realise this topic has been dormant for a very long time, but I’m considering a Wotancraft 3.5 for a new kit of M11 and three lenses - 21, 35, 75. I’m a little confused by one report above that says the bag will take three lenses and thus this amount of kit, but two others saying it’s fine for camera plus two lenses. Could an owner possibly confirm whether it’s two or three? (I know I like the brand, as I’m using a 2 for my Q3, and I realise that I can take an M11 with one lens in that, but I’ll need something for all three.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Goon525 said:

I realise this topic has been dormant for a very long time, but I’m considering a Wotancraft 3.5 for a new kit of M11 and three lenses - 21, 35, 75. I’m a little confused by one report above that says the bag will take three lenses and thus this amount of kit, but two others saying it’s fine for camera plus two lenses. Could an owner possibly confirm whether it’s two or three? (I know I like the brand, as I’m using a 2 for my Q3, and I realise that I can take an M11 with one lens in that, but I’ll need something for all three.)

See pics.  People pack bags differently, especially considering option to use divider “shelf” or lens coupler (back-to -back), etc.  I don’t own it; just an observation.

https://www.snapsbyfox.com/blog/wotancraft-pilot-35l-camera-sling-bag-review

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jeff S said:

See pics.  People pack bags differently, especially considering option to use divider “shelf” or lens coupler (back-to -back), etc.  I don’t own it; just an observation.

https://www.snapsbyfox.com/blog/wotancraft-pilot-35l-camera-sling-bag-review

I appreciate the link to the review, but neither that nor the pics quite answer my very specific question - which is why I’d appreciate a response from an owner with M gear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't talk about the Wotancraft, but I use a pair of two after market rear lens caps glued together with hot glue to store two lenses in one compartment. Depending on lens size, it works very well with a Peakdesign Sling 3L. For this demo I used a Summilux 35mm and a Summicron 75mm.

OP/TECH USA offers a similar solution that has both advantages and disadvantages:

Advantage: OP/TECH dual caps use an o-ring in the cap to seal the lens and ensure a strong friction fit (but normal lens caps are good enough - never had any slippage. The height of an OP/TECH dual cap is slightly less then the home made solution.

Disadvantages: Lenses with protruding rear element might not fit at every distance scale setting (the Summilux 1.4/35 asph CF only fits at infinity, ) and (more important) the lens only fits the cap correctly aligned (normal lens caps are rotation independent). The price of the OP/TECH solution easily triples the self made solution.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Goon525 said:

I appreciate the link to the review, but neither that nor the pics quite answer my very specific question - which is why I’d appreciate a response from an owner with M gear.

The link wasn’t the most relevant part of my comments, although it did show the shelf option. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Goon525 said:

I realise this topic has been dormant for a very long time, but I’m considering a Wotancraft 3.5 for a new kit of M11 and three lenses - 21, 35, 75. I’m a little confused by one report above that says the bag will take three lenses and thus this amount of kit, but two others saying it’s fine for camera plus two lenses. Could an owner possibly confirm whether it’s two or three? (I know I like the brand, as I’m using a 2 for my Q3, and I realise that I can take an M11 with one lens in that, but I’ll need something for all three.)

I have the 3.5L bag.  I typically have a 35mm lens on the camera and a 75mm lens in its lens case in the bag.  There is easily enough room for another lens, but...

The but is the supplied divider.   It can only create two pockets.  The camera will be touching one of the spare lenses or the two lenses will be touching each other.  I wouldn't like that.  Perhaps you don't care.  Using another divider would resolve my issue.  Best would be for me to use a divider from a Peak Design bag I have which can be folded into a T configuration.  That would allow me to create three pockets for camera plus lens and two additional lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, marchyman said:

I have the 3.5L bag.  I typically have a 35mm lens on the camera and a 75mm lens in its lens case in the bag.  There is easily enough room for another lens, but...

The but is the supplied divider.   It can only create two pockets.  The camera will be touching one of the spare lenses or the two lenses will be touching each other.  I wouldn't like that.  Perhaps you don't care.  Using another divider would resolve my issue.  Best would be for me to use a divider from a Peak Design bag I have which can be folded into a T configuration.  That would allow me to create three pockets for camera plus lens and two additional lenses.

Thank you, Marchyman, that’s just what I needed to know. I’m sure I’ll find a way of creating a divider with a bit from an old bag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2025 at 10:43 AM, jgeenen said:

Can't talk about the Wotancraft, but I use a pair of two after market rear lens caps glued together with hot glue to store two lenses in one compartment. Depending on lens size, it works very well with a Peakdesign Sling 3L. For this demo I used a Summilux 35mm and a Summicron 75mm.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Does the weigh of that 75mm resting on the front of the 35mm not concern you? I thought about this but was concerned the front of the lens wasn’t designed to bear the weight of another lens?

Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 9 Stunden schrieb kiwidad:

Does the weigh of that 75mm resting on the front of the 35mm not concern you? I thought about this but was concerned the front of the lens wasn’t designed to bear the weight of another lens?

No. I am doing this for years now and never experienced an issue. Technically I would say: A static weight of 500g can be easily handled by the brass barrel and the multiple groves of the focusing spiral. If the construction of a lens would be so delicate, focusing mechanism or calibration of a lens would wear out in a short period of time of normal use. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...