David Cantor Posted November 7, 2023 Share #1 Posted November 7, 2023 Advertisement (gone after registration) Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! 14 Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/384080-nate-bate-h-again/?do=findComment&comment=4895193'>More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 7, 2023 Posted November 7, 2023 Hi David Cantor, Take a look here Nate Bate H - Again. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
fotografr Posted November 7, 2023 Share #2 Posted November 7, 2023 Classic. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuny Posted November 8, 2023 Share #3 Posted November 8, 2023 Yikes! You keep posting superb images that are better and better/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cantor Posted November 8, 2023 Author Share #4 Posted November 8, 2023 1 hour ago, stuny said: Yikes! You keep posting superb images that are better and better/ Thank you Stuart, Nat is a rapper and our paths often cross. I made a couple of prints, mounted them for him and this was taken when we met up by arrangement so that I could pass them to him. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StS Posted November 8, 2023 Share #5 Posted November 8, 2023 Excellent portrait, outstanding tonal control Stefan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NigelG Posted November 8, 2023 Share #6 Posted November 8, 2023 Great portrait…but reversed? (Unless he wears an EHT HTRON ECAF hat)? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cantor Posted November 8, 2023 Author Share #7 Posted November 8, 2023 Advertisement (gone after registration) 20 minutes ago, NigelG said: Great portrait…but reversed? (Unless he wears an EHT HTRON ECAF hat)? Oops didn’t notice that. Yes I flipped the photo, it seemed to be more dynamic this way. Well spotted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NigelG Posted November 9, 2023 Share #8 Posted November 9, 2023 4 hours ago, David Cantor said: Oops didn’t notice that. Yes I flipped the photo, it seemed to be more dynamic this way. Well spotted I definitely think it’s the “right” orientation dynamically - flipped it mentally and it’s not as strong imho. The “curse of the logo” strikes again (surprising how many images in the national press suffer from this now subs and picture-subs are thin on the ground…or maybe that’s just The Times?) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cantor Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share #9 Posted November 9, 2023 4 hours ago, NigelG said: I definitely think it’s the “right” orientation dynamically - flipped it mentally and it’s not as strong imho. The “curse of the logo” strikes again (surprising how many images in the national press suffer from this now subs and picture-subs are thin on the ground…or maybe that’s just The Times?) I seem to remember reading somewhere that diagonals in photos are more dynamic from bottom left to top right and I think it’s true. His arms and hand make a diagonal, if I print this for Nate, I”ll flip the logo. David 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now