Jump to content

Shooting in colour with jpeg saved on other card in bw...is there a way?


Recommended Posts

Well - that might be a personal preference, but I have never liked those in-camera conversions, I like to do it properly. A bit like airline fodder compared to home cooking.

At any rate, why store them on two different cards? It is easy enough to separate the files in the computer. You can even import them into LR twice, first the DNGs, then the JPGs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps a bit OT but related, I like to save DNGs to one card and JPGs to the other. This should be faster as you can split the write threads across 2 cards, but I also feel like there is a bit of extra safety if one card should have issues. 

Ok, back to the topic... I don't know how to shoot in colour and save to B&W, and I don't recall any other camera system that does it or could do it.

In fact, as far as I understand it, it would not be possible with any mirrorless system, as the design of mirrorless forces the EVF to be a view of the JPG image (whether the JPG actually gets saved or not is immaterial to the EVF). It is a topic of frustration for many RAW users, as they complain that they cannot fully see the full DR of the RAW image because the EVF is only displaying the view and histogram of the JPG. IOW, you may think you've exposed the RAW fully but may have clipped highlights that you could not see in the EVF (or LCD for that matter). 

Perhaps an analogy is that the RAW data is like the alphabet; it contains all the information needed to create any word you want, yet contains no words at all. The JPG is like the camera specific dictionary with the specific words that the maker chooses to include "already builtin". The RAW developer is the process to combine any or all letters of the alphabet to make any word you choose. 

TLDR; you cannot create a B&W JPG while trying to see colour in the EVF or LCD, and that is by design. The DNG is always a full set of the data, but waiting/needing to be converted and processed into whatever colour or B&W image you want, so it cannot be used to build the display, whereas the JPG profile selected is an already processed image that can be used to create the display within the EVF and LCD. 

As always, I stand to be corrected, and there may be some systems that bypass this. 

But, a question - why would you want to? 

Brad

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kobra said:

 

But, a question - why would you want to? 

Brad

post #7

 

bw jpeg being a 'preview' how +/- my shot in colour would look like in bw...if I like such a bw 'preview', then I add another master copy of my dng and do proper bw to my liking..

the way I see it, it is all about software.. 

Edited by Genoweffa
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Genoweffa said:

post #7

 

bw jpeg being a 'preview' how +/- my shot in colour would look like in bw...if I like such a bw 'preview', then I add another master copy of my dng and do proper bw to my liking..

the way I see it, it is all about software.. 

Got it, thanks for the update.  

Yes, I agree that it is "all about software". In fact it is software inside the camera that is taking the RAW data from the sensor and creating an in-camera JPG image. 

But here is the issue - which ONE JPG would you like the camera to create? A colour one with a profile for a specific set of colour instructions, or a different one with specific B&W instructions? By design - and limited by the processing power of the camera - there are not multiple JPG profiles created; just ONE, and that same ONE JPG is used both for display and for output to storage (if chosen). Technically there might be more than one size of JPG created such as a smaller one for display and a larger one for storage, but the processing is only done once, based on the one profile selected. And, as I noted before, the in camera DNG cannot be used for display as it is purely RAW data which would display gibberish to our eyes. 

What you are asking for is that a manufacturer would have the camera process 2 separate JPG images so that you can choose which one to use for display and which different one to use for output to storage. I don't believe this has ever been done, and I can see many reasons why it would not be practical for a manufacturer to do so. The reason that comes first to mind is that when a new camera model comes out with increased hardware processing power, it goes to improving things that are in great demand; such as better AF and better video capabilities; both of which will use any and all new processing power and then some. (an example is the difference between Sony A7R4 and A7R5 - increased power seems to have gone to improving the above items). 

I hope that makes sense and again I stand to be corrected if there is a camera model where they have found a way to do this. 

Brad

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is that the JPG file is created from the data contained in the DNG file. In fact, the process always takes place even when you shoot DNG only to produce the image on your LCD screen. Correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t know of any camera writing the files to different cards. I think that it would  be a complicated bit of software for a feature with rather limited usefulness. 
Exactly the same effect can be created in the computer. When I open Bridge my DNG and JPG get displayed side by side with the activated file on my secondary screen. What more could you want?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Genoweffa said:

Shoot in colour, get ready jpegs in bw at the same time,,,so when you do editing and have a desire to convert some colour shots into bw, those jpgs would act as a guide...worth it or not?

Lightroom Classic has 17 built-in B&W profiles in addition to the standard Adobe B&W, Adobe Monochrome and the embedded Leica B&W profile. How can a camera-made JPEG act as a guide when there are so many other possibilities?

BTW, personally I also have a lot of other B&W (and color) profiles from other suppliers, with even more choices, and don't want to lock myself into one single look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, 

i Shot raw in bw. 
i See bw 

i get both and I get the jpg too.

And to mer tja absolut fastest way of posting images is either using the app > which lead to a set of way to convert to bw 

and if this doesn’t work I take a picture of the screen and send it. 
 

but I never was in a situation where I had to speed that much up. 
 

the only place I can think of is a sport event / wedding / accident…. 
 

maybe 🤔 you could help us with 

“to speed up” 

thanxs 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BernardC said:

This is probably different from the original ask, but I usually set my SL to B&W JPEGS. I find that it helps with composition. As others have explained, the files are in colour when you import them into your favourite raw converter.

I often use DNG+B&W Jpegs for the M8 and M9. With the M8 especially they are so good it is sometimes hard to improve them starting from a DNG.
It is reassuring to have the DNG if you want color or different PP of the B&W.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jaapv said:

The point is that the JPG file is created from the data contained in the DNG file. In fact, the process always takes place even when you shoot DNG only to produce the image on your LCD screen. Correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t know of any camera writing the files to different cards. I think that it would  be a complicated bit of software for a feature with rather limited usefulness. 
Exactly the same effect can be created in the computer. When I open Bridge my DNG and JPG get displayed side by side with the activated file on my secondary screen. What more could you want?  

I'm not sure if I completely understand so will state it as I know it - perhaps it is the same, but here goes... the SL2 and SL2-S have dual slots, so they can write files to different cards at the same time. There are several options for the second card, including a backup, or an overflow, or choosing to write DNG files on one card and JPG files on the other card. 

I agree that setting the camera to DNG + JPG (whether to one card or two cards) will allow all the flexibility to create final images in B&W and/or colour. 

I also agree with those who say that using JPG only seems to be wasting a lot of potential information. However, the question may remain - how often is that extra information contained in the DNG required to develop a wonderful image? In my experience, I have found that a properly exposed and composed image is often the biggest determining factor on the quality of the end image; and done right, in many cases, the OOC JPG may be all that is needed. 

Brad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...