Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi everyone 


So recently I fell in love with the wide shots from the Xpan and was wondering what is the best way to achieve this on my M11. 

From my understanding, the Xpan has an aspect ratio of 65:24. What should my resolution be if I'm shooting on a 35mm? 

 

I don't want to take multiple pictures and stitch them together on PS.  I also saw a video that said a full-frame sensor just needs to shoot with 28mm, to get this look is that also correct?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by JulyLL
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

x
vor 47 Minuten schrieb JulyLL:

From my understanding, the XPan has an aspect ratio of 65:24.

That's right.

.

vor 47 Minuten schrieb JulyLL:

What should my resolution be if I'm shooting on a 35mm?

When shooting the M11 at 60 MP and cropping to 65:24 aspect ratio (i. e. 13.29 × 36 mm format), you'd be left with 33.3 MP.

To resemble the angles-of-view of the 30 mm, 45 mm, and 90 mm XPan lenses, on a 35-mm-format camera you'd need 17 mm, 25 mm, and 50 mm lenses, respectively (16 mm and 24 mm would be close enough). But then, in fact you can use any M lens — it is not really important to mimic the XPan lenses exactly.

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

 I was just experimenting with a picture. The camera is a Sigma fp, so 6000x4000 pixels. After cropping the picture is 6000x2215 pixels.

The maximum size for the LUF is 19.5 MB, and the cropped picture is 8.5 MB.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by jankap
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll end up with an image that's 9528 x 3518 pixels in size, starting with the original full sized file.

X-Pan had several focal lengths - you can shoot which ever you find gets you the FOV you like, but wider generally get more of the cinematic feel of the original.

Here with 35mm Summilux.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting topic.  Out of curiosity I just grabbed the first landscape taken with 21mm SEM (on M10M) I found in my library and changed the crop to the given 13.9 x 36 proportion.  

Might consider that for other landscapes in the future!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

30 minutes ago, Keith (M) said:

Interesting topic.  Out of curiosity I just grabbed the first landscape taken with 21mm SEM (on M10M) I found in my library and changed the crop to the given 13.9 x 36 proportion.  

Might consider that for other landscapes in the future!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

It’s funny you mention the SEM. I have one of those arriving tomorrow as I to enjoy the wide angle aspect, it was what made me move from the m10r to the m11 - more pixels for better cropping the 2.7:1 aspect. I thought the SEM could be killer for this, looks like it is!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another SE 21mm converted to 13.29X36

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple from yesterday with the M11+35lux.

An interesting camera for this is actually the Sigma FP-L, it has a pretty wide crop available in camera of 21:9 and the ability to dial in a custom crop. I have one as my backpacking camera with the excellent Sigma primes.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, robsonj said:

A couple from yesterday with the M11+35lux.

An interesting camera for this is actually the Sigma FP-L, it has a pretty wide crop available in camera of 21:9 and the ability to dial in a custom crop. I have one as my backpacking camera with the excellent Sigma primes.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Love these shots can you show me 1 sample from M11 with 35mm and the other with the sigma 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JulyLL said:

Love these shots can you show me 1 sample from M11 with 35mm and the other with the sigma 

I don't have many with the Sigma, just picked it up in prep for a backpacking trip in the summer, here are a few, these are actually shot with the little panny 20-60mm zoom, which might be what I take backpacking with it as it makes for a lighter setup, not all wide angles here, they're also not shot at 35mm, the barn shots are both at 60mm, the red store is at 27mm, so they may not be that useful to you...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by robsonj
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it’s off-topic but I’ve been experimenting with the SL2 and the Zeiss 25mm Biogon ZM.  The SL2 has an in-camera crop mode of 3:1, so I can sorta frame it as I would an X-Pan and I’d have an almost exact frame as with the 45mm f/4.  I’d love to see this added as an option to the M line with live view.  Or like my Mamiya 7, have an external finder with the 2.7:1 lines.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a little comparison. Originals shot with SEM 21mm. (added vignette) and I paste them here with the Crop discussed.  It does change the character of the images considerably although I am not 100% sure of which is better.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 65:24 ratio is one of my favourites. But I almost always use Fuji GFX100S for that ratio, since it does have the in-camera setting so it’s nice to see the viewfinder in an “actual” 65:24 format. That being said, I occasionally crop my M11 images to 65:24 and it yields 33.3 MP resolution (still plenty for a sizable print).

Here’s a shot with M11 cropped to 65:24

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a TX-1 (Fuji variant) and worked with it for a while around 2010.  I liked the challenge of filling such a wide frame with activity.  I was less interested in achieving a mysterious "cinematic" style.  Didn't succeed often, but when this works out, the images are really striking:

 

 

It's certainly true that you can use the 4x4 grid overlay to visualize this with an M-11 with liveview enabled, but the SL and SL-2s  do it better with the 3:1 setting for Aspect ratio.  You see the 3:1 while shooting,  get a jpeg framed to match what you saw, and the whole DNG frame allows for corrections in framing as well as normal post processing options.

Incidentally, Leica set up an S2 for Janos Koudelka to use when his Fuji 670 (a 120 film wideangle camera that predated the TX-1 and had a 3:1 aspect ratio) was damaged.  He shot "The Wall" with it.  I don't know if the 3:1 aspect ratio already existed or was created first for his use. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Historically I shot this format first with the Fujifilm G617 medium format camera, and 120 film. This was a very manual experience, no AF, no metering, lots of thinking before you pressed the shutter as each shot took three frames of 120 film, and cost you $5 in film+processing! 

Still the results were well worth the effort, if not the cost!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Small correction to my note just above (why can't I edit after 6 hours??).  Fuji's camera was the G617 (and CDodkin is a user of that one).  It was introduced in 1983, still sold into the 2010s.  Manual focus, no rangefinder  and fixed lens, with a spirit level that could be seen in the viewfinder (as did the Hasselblad Superwide).  In the 1990s, Fuji introduced an interchangeable lens model GC617.  Users objected that, since the shutter was in the lens, it was not possible to change lenses in the middle of a roll of 120 film.  But a roll of 120 film gives only four exposures, so with today's "spray and pray" practices, only changing lenses every fourth shot doesn't seem like much of a problem.  Only those who know the pleasures of roll film tank development would understand.

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity I just maltreated a D-Lux 7 .rwl file.  Doesn't look too bad on-screen. 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

And now back to your regular programme...

Edited by Keith (M)
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, sometimes simple domestic scenes fit nicely into the 3:1 format:

Fuji TX-1 2009-11-07

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...