Jump to content

50mm to Pair with Q2

lifeandmylens
 Share

Recommended Posts

lifeandmylens

lifeandmylens

Posted
Posted (edited)

Advertisement (gone after registration)

2 weeks away from having 2 kids under the age of 2.  Recently got a used Q2 and really enjoy it.  Got it because my M11 is getting harder to focus with my moving toddler.  

I'm looking for another body that I can use with a 50mm and maybe also a 90mm, but that are rather small, yet have great IQ.  So definitely no 50 Summilux SL!  Of course a Q250 would be great.  What's the next best option? CL, A7C, Fuji?

Edited by lifeandmylens
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

lifeandmylens
lifeandmylens

Thank you all for your great suggestions! Ultimately this from @cesc is exactly how I felt.  I didn’t need new gear.  I think I was just worried about missing shots with a new kid on the way and

JoshuaR
JoshuaR

This is a good point. But part of what I take from it, as a dad photographer, is that the "moving toddler" scenario isn't necessarily crucially important. It's actually a very specific type of image—o

jaapv
jaapv

Well, this response is just about as unhelpful as any. Quite a few experienced RF shooters have no problem at all photographing fast moving subjects, whilst they struggle with moving focus points, usi

Posted Images

bobtodrick

bobtodrick

Posted
Posted

My son has a Fuji X-E2s.  Very quick A/F and compact...likely about 20% smaller than your M11.

This is a recent photo he took...the B&W is very good.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
vedivv

vedivv

Posted
Posted

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Unfortunately, for small kids who constantly move, the Sony and Canon (perhaps Nikon) are only viable choices with longer lenses.  With young kids at closer distance, the AF element actually need to move a lot.  My Q2 focus rather slow for this particular application, but since DOF at 28 is not that shallow, it has worked well for me most of the time.  SL is faster for sure, but with Panasonic contrast detection AF, it is still slow for small kids (good enough for kids playing sport).  CL/TL are last generation and discontinued, and definitely not fast enough for kids.  Love Fuji, but unfortunately they are behind as well in the AF department.  

Still love my RX1.  Would be nice if Sony comes up with with a 50mm fixed prime lens camera that uses their latest AF technology.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Simone_DF

Simone_DF

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, lifeandmylens said:

2 weeks away from having 2 kids under the age of 2.  Recently got a used Q2 and really enjoy it.  Got it because my M11 is getting harder to focus with my moving toddler.  

I'm looking for another body that I can use with a 50mm and maybe also a 90mm, but that are rather small, yet have great IQ.  So definitely no 50 Summilux SL!  Of course a Q250 would be great.  What's the next best option? CL, A7C, Fuji?

If only Leica made a Q with a 50mm lens, right? 🙃 But the boomers on the forum says no, because who knows why.

Fuji XT5. As an alternative, a Sony A7III + the Sony/Zeiss 55mm is blazing fast and lightweight.

Forget the CL, autofocus is subpar.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Qwertynm

Qwertynm

Posted
Posted (edited)
vor 5 Stunden schrieb vedivv:

Unfortunately, for small kids who constantly move, the Sony and Canon (perhaps Nikon) are only viable choices with longer lenses.

I agree with the first part of your sentence and don’t understand the second. I have many pictures shot in the last 18 months of our son with the Canon R5 and 35 1.4. The cameras AF system does not become worse with shorter lenses as far as I know. Or maybe I’m misunderstanding you. 
 

I‘d certainly consider a MILC from Sony, Canon, Nikon. Sony has the most mature lens offering while many prefer the haptics and colours of Canon. I don’t know anything about Nikon but the best thing you can do is go to a store and take every camera in your hands and try it out. At this point in camera time there is not much you can do wrong with any of these aforementioned systems. Good luck and congrats on the twins. 

Edited by Qwertynm
Link to post
Share on other sites
Qwertynm

Qwertynm

Posted
Posted

We just received little printed desk calenders with pictures of our son and family on them to give away as christmasgifts to grandparents, aunts and so on. I’m sad about every pic my wife took with her phone instead of one of my cameras. The quality is ok in good light but even in this this tiny format (smaller than 4 by 6“) the quality of the iPhone is shite…

Link to post
Share on other sites
Farrell Gallery

Farrell Gallery

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Simone_DF said:

If only Leica made a Q with a 50mm lens, right? 🙃 But the boomers on the forum says no, because who knows why.

Fuji XT5. As an alternative, a Sony A7III + the Sony/Zeiss 55mm is blazing fast and lightweight.

Forget the CL, autofocus is subpar.

What about the SL series, if you like the interface and size? But yeah, Fujis are great too

 

Edited by Farrell Gallery
Link to post
Share on other sites
lencap

lencap

Posted
Posted (edited)

I agree with ianforber.  My iPhone 14 Pro is surprisingly capable.  Plenty of reviews on the net if you want details.  In real world use it's hard to beat.  Equivalent of 24-75mm focal length, and can zoom farther with the electronic lens.  You can easily process the images in the Apple ecosystem (or port them to third party options), and have very acceptable stills and video images that can be sent anywhere in seconds.  The iPhone uses the newest computational algos for image processing.  Some prefer a more traditional approach, but I believe computational imaging is the future, and Apple does it very well.  In fact you can argue that Leica uses a form of it as well in the Q camera line, automatically correcting lens distortion for a better image.  The SL platform does as well, extending the correction to L mount lenses.    

Third party apps, like Halide, provide far more manual control than Apple's interface, and there are easy exports to LR/PS and other processing tools.  Best of all the camera is with you all the time, weights a bit over 8 ounces and backups to the cloud, if you want, automatically making on phone storage a non-issue.  All of that costs $999, and for that you also have a top quality phone/internet access and an unlimited suite of apps.

DXOmark reviewed the phone and found it to have the best bokeh, video and still image preview of any phone, with an overall rating of 146.  As a comparison the Leica M11 overall rating is 100 (somewhat different criteria), and it get a very high sensor rating.  The Q2 rating is 96, also getting a high rating on the sensor.  

The full DXO iPhone 14 Pro review is here: https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/Apple/iPhone-14-Pro

I'm not suggesting we all sell our Leica gear and buy an iPhone, but for the use you cite the iPhone may be one of the better alternatives, especially with the upgraded 48MP sensor that, like the M11, can bin pixels for lower resolution images with better low light capability.  

 

Edited by lencap
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
liggy

liggy

Posted
Posted

The Sony 50 1.2 is a razor sharp tool with great af but not exactly small.  My favorite 50mm small equivalent lens/body is the Fuji X-T5 with the old 35 1.4 lens.  Small and really pleasing.  Nice little carry-around lens.   

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
DenverSteve

DenverSteve

Posted
Posted (edited)

Actually, If you are good with another system, you can't go wrong with the A7C.  However, contrary, I (like many other pros) use the CL for extensive professional work and I would highly recommend that to keep you in the Leica fold. The best benefit is that you can use your M-mount lenses with it.  I find no issues with the autofocus.  Beyond those two, almost any/every camera available today will suit your needs to shoot your family.  

Howver, and unfortunately, it's just the modern generation(s) who believe that the M, or manual-focus in general, isn't suitable for..... X? Professional motorsports, football basketball, family photos............... have all been done with manual-focus equipment for around 100 years. If you want another camera for your bag, that's certainly understandable. However, those thinking that you can't do what you want without autofocus are incorrect.  Unless your kids are different than those that came before them, you would be fine.  

 
Edited by DenverSteve
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...