SchokkerJJ Posted October 2, 2007 Share #1  Posted October 2, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) I was wondering if some persons here on the Leica forum use a flatbedscanner to scan their prints that came out of the darkroom.  I am thinking of buying a scanner to scan my bw prints so I can show them on internet...any advice on a suitable scanner or some scanned examples?   Thanks!  Jeroen  Schokker Photography Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 2, 2007 Posted October 2, 2007 Hi SchokkerJJ, Take a look here Scanning your prints with flatbedscanner?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
valtof Posted October 2, 2007 Share #2 Â Posted October 2, 2007 See my thread : Scanning 35mm with Epson V700... Meanwhile for opaque originals, the scan area is only 21x29.7 cm. Cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchokkerJJ Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share #3 Â Posted October 2, 2007 hi valtof, I am not planning to scan my negatives because I already have a Dual scan IV negative scanner. I do a lot of b&w darkroom (full frame) printing, mostly 7 x 9,5 in. and I want to scan these prints for webuse only. So I think a very basic scanner will do the job? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted October 2, 2007 Share #4 Â Posted October 2, 2007 If you're scanning prints to display on a web page, yes, any flat bed scanner will do. The basic Canon model is fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_x2004 Posted October 3, 2007 Share #5 Â Posted October 3, 2007 If you can edit properly, then for web presentation few will be able to pick out your flatbed scans of negatives from those gathered from the dedicated film scanner. It took solid work to get the film scanner to do as good a job when I first got it. For prints it is another matter, but for web presentation only, of documents, or properly produced photos, a cheap as chips flatbed should eat the task these days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
odd Posted October 3, 2007 Share #6  Posted October 3, 2007 Hi  I' m scanning my prints for web on a cheap Cannon scanner. Most of them are 5 x 5 cm and not showen here. But you can see some pictures on this link:  http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/film-forum/33715-experimenting-lith.html  OM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountaineer-American Posted October 6, 2007 Share #7 Â Posted October 6, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Jeroen, I use an Epson Stylus CX4800. Don't know where you reside but it was a hundred bucks here in the US of A. However, a set of the 4 ink cartridges is about $70. Bought it for printing & scanning documents, photography as secondary use. You can see how it works if you search my posts. Everything except chromes were scanned on it. I send my films to a professional lab for processing. Occasionally I scan a print & post it on this site. I reckon the scanner is not professional quality but I have enjoyed putting up the occasional post. Â "Don't start vast projects with half-vast ideas." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.Morrison Posted October 7, 2007 Share #8 Â Posted October 7, 2007 I find that most of my colour prints that come from commercial labs are O.K. for density and colour balance and are therefore acceptable for for scanning on a flatbed. But make sure your flatbed has anti-Newtoning glass because some glossy print surfaces create Newton rings when scanned. That said, I usually specify gloss prints for scanning purposes because a sharper image is produced. As for black and white prints nearly all commercial labs print these a way too contrasty and these generally are unsuitable for scanning. Further, almost any black and white print benefits from some dodging and burning which most commercail labs have no idea how to do. Therefore I limit my scanning to colour; a pity, since I shoot mostly black and white. Â Yours, Robert Morrison, M4-P, etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luigi bertolotti Posted October 7, 2007 Share #9 Â Posted October 7, 2007 If it's simply for web publishing, I think any modern cheap flatbed can do it well... I have made use of my PSC1500 HP All-in-one and really it works fine (not fast, of course). Usually HP provides also some good Software, and in this respect maybe a "pure scanner" (not an All-in-one) can have something more... time ago I had an HP flatbed and remember that the utilities on scanning were richer than the ones provided with my present All in One: usually, in its web site, HP details well the Software embedded in the peripherals' boxes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fassbender Posted October 8, 2007 Share #10 Â Posted October 8, 2007 I've done it before with an old flatbed scanner, it can be done and for web posting it's a good option. I must say however that such scans hardly ever do any justice to the original wet print. As said, for web posting only, any cheap (2nd hand??) flatbed scanner will do a fine job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchokkerJJ Posted October 17, 2007 Author Share #11 Â Posted October 17, 2007 Got my FB scanner ;-) Found a Epson 4490 Photo cheap, thanks for your replies! Â Scan at 72dpi in 2 seconds, sharpening in ps and voila: Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.