Jump to content

Best ISO-setting or D-Lux 3


Overgaard

Recommended Posts

Guest tummydoc

ISO 100 RAW, maybe 100 JPEG if you don't make big prints. 200 RAW is as high as I would go before some kind of noise reduction plug-in would be recommended. The in-camera noise reduction is appalling, it smears fine detail to death. I gave one to my wife, and she shoots happy snaps and even she can't stand ISO 400 JPEGs. I also gave one to my daughter, who isn't petrified or lazy to shoot RAW and use Noise Ninja (which has profiles for the camera at each ISO and works quite automatically), and her results are incomparably better. From my point of view, the ability to shoot RAW is what stands the camera and the LX-2 apart from the herd. There are far less expensive cameras that have far better in-camera JPEG processing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turn the in-camera NR to its lowest setting and you can get good results, with film-grain-like noise, up to ISO 800 (especially in B&W). ISO 100 will print well up to 16"x20". ISO 400 will print well in B&W up to 16x20, if you're willing to have an image that looks like it was printed from Tri-X or HP-5.

 

Some ISO 800 shots from last night in Southwark:

 

1409895502_443f9a56e9_b.jpg

 

1409891726_0c05fcc6dd_b.jpg

 

1409887660_b81cc7f267_b.jpg

 

More at the Flickr site in my sig.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...