Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Dear members, 

I have successfully managed to trim my old CL to use 1,5 V batteries, following the instructions here:

https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/trimming-of-the-leica-cl-lightmeter.167240/

Is there a similar algoritm for M5 that anyone would share here, I'd be most grateful. 

Thanks in advance

Edited by ernst_leitz
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

M5 has those adjustments located under the lower strap lug. The circuit board is pretty simple. My guess is that procedure is applicable if you can find which screw adjusts which stage. The fork- shaped lever is battery check actuator.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 4 Stunden schrieb ernst_leitz:

Dear members, 

I have successfully managed to trim my old CL to use 1,5 V batteries, following the instructions here:

https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/trimming-of-the-leica-cl-lightmeter.167240/

Is there a similar algoritm for M5 that anyone would share here, I'd be most grateful. 

Thanks in advance

Either the camera‘s lightmeter is independent, then an adjustment is either not necessary (since it is a small voltage difference from 1.35v for mercury cells to 1,5v for alkaline)

Or the meter‘s reading is dependent on its supply voltage, then the alkaline battery will never work😉

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!


The output of an alkaline cell varies over its discharge from almost 1.6v down to less than 1v. You either only use the first part of it (by waiting until it is at 1.5v and replacing it once it reaches about 1.45v) after a couple of months) or you go through that calibration process several times per year. The amazing constancy of the mercury cell‘s output at 1.35v is one of the reasons for their usage (together with an extremely low self-discharge).

I would definitely recommend to go with silver cells and an adapter or with zinc air cells (aka Wein cells).

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

This adapter has been recommended by a few techs as better than Kanto’s.  It is also cheaper, I am very happy with mine.  It regulates voltage as it has a diode in it, it is NOT a dumb adapter.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/130646083632

I use it in my Pen FT.  I had my M5 modified by DAG to use regular cells.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 30 Minuten schrieb Huss:

This adapter has been recommended by a few techs as better than Kanto’s.  It is also cheaper, I am very happy with mine.  It regulates voltage as it has a diode in it, it is NOT a dumb adapter.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/130646083632

I use it in my Pen FT.  I had my M5 modified by DAG to use regular cells.

Hmm? Kanto‘s adapter looks at least like that, if not better. Kanto‘s adapter uses also a diode to create 1.35v out of the silver cell‘s 1.55v (probably the same type, a shottky) and Kanto’s is less expensive (2762¥ = ~20$).

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 11 Stunden schrieb ernst_leitz:

Dear members, 

I have successfully managed to trim my old CL to use 1,5 V batteries, following the instructions here:

https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/trimming-of-the-leica-cl-lightmeter.167240/

Is there a similar algoritm for M5 that anyone would share here, I'd be most grateful. 

Thanks in advance

The linked how-to article is a permanent change of the built-in meter in order to use 1.55v silver cells instead of 1.35v mercury cells (it is NOT about 1.5v alkaline). It is also requiring a constant voltage (just a different value).

Even if you are considering to use silver cells with a non-converting (pure mechanical) adapter, I wouldn’t recommend it, since you are eliminating the potential usage of Wein cells for good.

Edited by Helge
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Helge said:

Hmm? Kanto‘s adapter looks at least like that, if not better. Kanto‘s adapter uses also a diode to create 1.35v out of the silver cell‘s 1.55v (probably the same type, a shottky) and Kanto’s is less expensive (2762¥ = ~20$).

I agree,  I got one of those from ebay and it did not have a diode,. Stick to the genuine MR-9, I got mine from Small Battery Company. more expensive but at least I know it has the required diode. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Matlock said:

I agree,  I got one of those from ebay and it did not have a diode,. Stick to the genuine MR-9, I got mine from Small Battery Company. more expensive but at least I know it has the required diode. 

There are many on ebay that are just ‘dumb’ adapters that all they do is physically allow a battery to be used.

This is not one of those, the diode in it adjusts the voltage from 1.5 to 1.35v

It is a higher quality piece than the Kanto one as this one is gold plated for better conductivity.

Edited by Huss
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don‘t overrate the added value of such a type of gold plating 😉

I‘m pretty confident, that Kanto’s has no contact issues either😉

Both are probably of equal quality…

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Huss said:

There are many on ebay that are just ‘dumb’ adapters that all they do is physically allow a battery to be used.

This is not one of those, the diode in it adjusts the voltage from 1.5 to 1.35v

It is a higher quality piece than the Kanto one as this one is gold plated for better conductivity.

The one I bought had gold plating, it means nothing at all. The ones with the diode are fairly easy to spot but, of course, only when you get to handle them.

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to this discussion see this review of the Thai adapter from Amazon.

"Arrived in the mail today. I started with the correct battery (A386) and measured its voltage -- 1.56v. I also got an A76 battery and measure its voltage -- 1.6v. Both batteries new.

Placed the 386 into the adapter and measured voltage -- 1.51v. Placed the A76 into the adapter and measured the voltage -- 1.55v. In each case the adapter did not reduce voltage to 1.35v as advertised, and as needed by PX625 devices. The 0.04v reduction in voltage is insignificant.

The adapter is pretty. It is a shiny gold color (advertised as gold plated) and feels solid; perhaps too solid?

This item comes from Thailand "

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Huss said:

This adapter has been recommended by a few techs as better than Kanto’s.  It is also cheaper, I am very happy with mine.  It regulates voltage as it has a diode in it, it is NOT a dumb adapter.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/130646083632

I use it in my Pen FT.  I had my M5 modified by DAG to use regular cells.

I got one of these recently for my Yashica Mat 124G and it works great. But it doesn't have a diode, yet all is not lost!

If I put 1.5v battery in the adapter it still reads 1.5v across the poles so the voltage is not being altered. However, the sneaky thing is that many of these adapters are marketed to recommend or to include a set of zinc hearing aid batteries, and despite saying 1.45v on the packet under load these all read 1.35v whether in or out of the adapter, so again no voltage change but the perfect voltage!! One thing to be careful of when using zinc hearing aid batteries is to take the sealing tab off and let them 'breath' for five minutes or they will under-read. For nearly all my P&S cameras I use Kanto MR-9 adapters which do convert the voltage.

Edit - I should add it's the 675 hearing aid battery that is needed.

Edited by 250swb
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Matlock said:

Further to this discussion see this review of the Thai adapter from Amazon.

"Arrived in the mail today. I started with the correct battery (A386) and measured its voltage -- 1.56v. I also got an A76 battery and measure its voltage -- 1.6v. Both batteries new.

Placed the 386 into the adapter and measured voltage -- 1.51v. Placed the A76 into the adapter and measured the voltage -- 1.55v. In each case the adapter did not reduce voltage to 1.35v as advertised, and as needed by PX625 devices. The 0.04v reduction in voltage is insignificant.

The adapter is pretty. It is a shiny gold color (advertised as gold plated) and feels solid; perhaps too solid?

This item comes from Thailand "

Can you provide a link to that Amazon review/listing?  There are many gold adapters, many are dumb adapters.  I want to see if it is the same one that I have.

 

edit - saw the post above.

Edited by Huss
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Matlock said:

Probably. This is the item reviewed and is obviously the same one Huss got from ebay.

 
 
 

Very interesting.  I'm wondering if some are defective or they changed the product.  This was recommended IIRC correctly by TLC camera repair.  With my Olympus Pen FT the meter reads perfectly.  I'm not disputing the reviews on Amazon, maybe I got lucky?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Matlock said:

Probably. This is the item reviewed and is obviously the same one Huss got from ebay

It's probably like most of the adapters of all types coming from the Far East whether battery adapters, lens adapters, filter adapters, etc. there is one company turning each out and they are distributed to retailers who can seller then as they are or badge them for higher retail price bracket. You see names people recommend such as Rayqual, but trawl the internet and exact copies are marketed by other companies. Maybe Rayqual takes the cream of the crop and other people sell the duds, but battery adapters are pretty dumb things, it either has a diode or it doesn't. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...