Jump to content

Recommended Posts

x
vor 29 Minuten schrieb marchyman:

Then why do so many complain about it's presence?

This might be your subjective opinion. If that was true and so many customers would have complained to Leica, then video would not be present in the Q2. The vast majority seems to be indifferent towards video. I‘d say the probability of the Q3 not having video is pretty low. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Le Chef said:

. . . which camera offers Leica the bigger growth potential?

Very good question!  My vote would go to the Q3 as I think it has wider appeal, but it’s going to be an expensive upgrade for existing Q2 users.  But then the Q2 was an expensive upgrade for Q users and it sells well (I think).

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, marchyman said:

Then why do so many complain about it's presence?  

Define “many”. 
The only people that want features removed are the users of this specific forum. 
Go to any other forum (DPR, Fred Miranda, etc) and ask about feature removal and you’ll be eaten alive. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HeinzX said:

If you do not use features, simply do not use them. But do not request to remove them. Others may like to use them.

Here is not about requesting but just stating our own wishes, and in the name of freedom of speech, as  long as everyone remains polite…

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

22 hours ago, Qwertynm said:

This might be your subjective opinion. If that was true and so many customers would have complained to Leica,

Yes, it might be my subjective opinion.  I would also not be surprised if people have complained to Leica.  You can't please everyone.  It's probably safe to say that Leica made a decision based upon how many might buy the camera with video vs how many might buy without.  It's a numbers game and my belief (no facts to back it up) that the "I want a video option" crowd is bigger.

I'm still using the original Q.  When the 3 is released I'll look at what it is, not what I'd like it to be, and then make a decision to buy or not.  The Q2 didn't add enough over my Q to make me want to buy.  The Q3 might.  And part of my eventual decision may be based upon the I-haven't-bought-a-camera-in-quite-a-while factor.  🙂 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, T25UFO said:

Very good question!  My vote would go to the Q3 as I think it has wider appeal, but it’s going to be an expensive upgrade for existing Q2 users.  But then the Q2 was an expensive upgrade for Q users and it sells well (I think).

On a totally subjective level, the SL seems to be further behind its competition than the Q2 (Fuji X100V?). That would also explain why Leica seem to have spent that last 12 months or so offering deals on pricing and trade-ins on the SL2/S. 

The opposite seems true with the Q2: Reporter special editions added, Q2M added, and probably some gussied up version named for Coldplay I’ve forgotten about with a kombu seaweed wrapping around the case.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

After not enjoying my M10 and returning to Fuji I bought an xt-4 and a crop of really good lenses, 8-16, new 18 1.4, 18-55 2.8, new 33 1.4, new 56 1.2 and 90 f2. All good stuff.

However, had a longing for a small fixed lens camera. Took a really long hard look at both the q and q2 before buying an x100v.

But I’d buy a q3 if it had faster focussing, IBIS and no increase in mega pixels. Does n’t the q2 have enough already?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2023 at 2:00 PM, Le Chef said:

On a totally subjective level, the SL seems to be further behind its competition than the Q2 (Fuji X100V?). That would also explain why Leica seem to have spent that last 12 months or so offering deals on pricing and trade-ins on the SL2/S. 

The opposite seems true with the Q2: Reporter special editions added, Q2M added, and probably some gussied up version named for Coldplay I’ve forgotten about with a kombu seaweed wrapping around the case.

The SL2/S don't compete in the same space as the Q2 at all.

The reason the SL2/S cameras are on sale is the SL3 is coming. They may also be clearing out the SL lens inventory before releasing a V2 of the SL lenses with faster AF motors. All the SL lenses are now out of stock on the Leica USA online store, and Leica Miami only has the Lux in stock. If the PDAF performance of the SL3 is on par with the new Lumix, then the SL3 will actually be competitive in its space in every way but affordability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m well aware that the SL2/S and Q2 don’t compete with each other. My point was about Leica’s business priorities and which successor was more important to launch first. My guess was the SL3 as the SL2/S lags significantly behind cameras like the Sony A7/V and even the LUMIX S5 II.

So if you were looking at Leica launches in 2023/24, then SL3 would be first, followed by M11M, and then spring of 2024 a Q3. It’s a guess: I have no insider knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My prediction is we will see the Q3 first, then closely followed by the M11M.  Finally, later in the year we will see the SL3 or possibly early 2024.  That is based on seeing the leaked images quite some time ago of the Q3.

However, now that the M10M is discontinued and probably an easier release than a new Q3, those two might flip with the M11M coming very soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, soccerrick10 said:

That is based on seeing the leaked images quite some time ago of the Q3.

That was the type of 3D model that manufacturers use to test concepts with audiences. That model also put the “Play” and “Menu” buttons directly below the scoop-out for the thumb, which would mean those buttons would like get pressed frequently by mistake. It’s why currently the buttons are to the left of the LCD on the Q2 and SL2/S and were  also located there on the CL.

Edited by Le Chef
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2023 at 10:26 PM, Pelu2010 said:

I See younger all very excited ! 
☺️

love this …. 
i go shooting ….

Man out correction sucks

I see you are all very excited about future Q3. 
I went shooting 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2023 at 1:59 PM, jbripley said:

My wishlist for the Q3 in priority order:

  1. A sensor with better low light support, current megapixel count is fine
  2. Phase detect auto-focus and better face/eye AF
  3. Rear screen that flips up/down, not to the side

Looking at the rumours and the release of the Panasonic S5 II, they all seem likely.

I agree with this 100%. The only thing I might add to the list is a joystick.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Le Chef said:

But you’re still here reading…

Dear Chef....one can not read 'nothing'

But one can quickly 'check' that there is 'nothing'...

And of course, my comment should not stop anyone from 'contributing' to 'nothing', so there will be way more of 'nothing'..

10-4

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...