Jeff S Posted October 29, 2021 Share #21 Posted October 29, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) Depends if one considers selected lens rendering aspects as ‘flaws’ or as ‘character’. More resolution will reveal more of either, depending on display parameters. Glass half empty/half full. Roger Cicala writes about common misperceptions regarding MP and interactions between camera and lens. See the brief Appendix (‘Why Perceptual Megapixels are Stupid’) at the end of following link… https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2019/10/more-ultra-high-resolution-mtf-experiments/ Jeff 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 29, 2021 Posted October 29, 2021 Hi Jeff S, Take a look here M10 - R: too many pixels?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
charlesphoto99 Posted October 29, 2021 Share #22 Posted October 29, 2021 1 hour ago, Tailwagger said: I was annoyed to see in some shots with an early 35mm lux shot wide open that there was a quite a bit of ghosting present in the corners at close distance when shot wide open. I one case I recall seeing concentric circles in the corner, flaws in the lens grinding. Yep. First Leica lens I owned, when I got an M6 back in '96. It did the exact thing you are talking about. Sold it on many ages ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photoworks Posted November 1, 2021 Share #23 Posted November 1, 2021 M10-R no problem, move on. old lenses have the same rendering on the 40mp camera just more pronounced , still beautiful . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now