ymc226 Posted September 19, 2021 Share #1 Posted September 19, 2021 Advertisement (gone after registration) Knowing that digital data inevitably goes bad, I want to preserve my digitized home videos as well as family photos as long as possible. As digital and NAS technology progresses, is it a good idea to get a new NAS every 5 years, keeping the older, pre-existing one as the back up? Currently, I have a 5+ year old Drobo FS and just added a Synology NAS to the same network. In about 5 years, will plan on replacing the Drobo which will be about 10 years. In both NAS devices, I’m using enterprise NAS designed hard drives. Also have 3rd copies on an external drive as well as a 4th copy backed up to Blackblaze. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 19, 2021 Posted September 19, 2021 Hi ymc226, Take a look here NAS back up and replacement for data preservation. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
robsonj Posted September 19, 2021 Share #2 Posted September 19, 2021 I do similar. Keep the last couple of years locally to the machine, backup with time machine, routinely merge to a mega catalog on a external drive, mirror that to a nas setup with mirroring and also sync to backblaze Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ymc226 Posted September 19, 2021 Author Share #3 Posted September 19, 2021 1 hour ago, robsonj said: I do similar. Keep the last couple of years locally to the machine, backup with time machine, routinely merge to a mega catalog on a external drive, mirror that to a nas setup with mirroring and also sync to backblaze Thanks for the reply. What program do you use to mirror to a NAS. I do have Carbon Copy Cloner but I think it only works for directly connected external drives, not NAS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeitz Posted September 19, 2021 Share #4 Posted September 19, 2021 1 hour ago, ymc226 said: I have a 5+ year old Drobo FS If you use Drobo dual redundancy (all data stored on three drives internal to the Drobo), why are you worried about drive failure? it would take three drives to fail simultaneously to loose any data. Even without dual redundancy, it takes two simultaneous drive failures. I still mirror my Drobo for off-site storage. My oldest Drobo is 7 years old, although I have replaced the hard drives to increase storage capacity, not because of chronic drive failure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsonj Posted September 19, 2021 Share #5 Posted September 19, 2021 2 hours ago, zeitz said: If you use Drobo dual redundancy (all data stored on three drives internal to the Drobo), why are you worried about drive failure? it would take three drives to fail simultaneously to loose any data. Even without dual redundancy, it takes two simultaneous drive failures. I still mirror my Drobo for off-site storage. My oldest Drobo is 7 years old, although I have replaced the hard drives to increase storage capacity, not because of chronic drive failure. Never trust a drobo, I’d be more worried about the drobo failing than the hard drives Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeitz Posted September 20, 2021 Share #6 Posted September 20, 2021 I've had three Drobos (Mini, 5D and 5D3) for over 7 years without a Drobo failure. Failed hard drives are simple to replace. But you still need an independent backup, no matter what RAID you are using. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now