Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

How do these lenses compare in image quality? Anybody has any insights? I don't see anyone complaining about the 75mm Leica but will you be equally satisfied with the XCD 90mm is the primary question..

Let's say you're not a biased Leica shooter :) Which of the below setup would you choose for a day of portrait shooting?
a) X1D + XCD 90mm f3.2

b) SL2 or SL2-S + SL 75mm f2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both lenses and both cameras will make excellent photographs with on par lens quality.

For portraiture, I prefer the 4:3 proportions of the Hasselblad sensor. I'd have to crop away a healthy percentage of the SL2 frame to achieve that format, reducing the SL2's pixel resolution equality. Plus the Hasselblad X1D sensor has a dynamic range advantage. So I'd pick the Hasselblad over the Leica in this competition, never mind that the X1D II body plus XCD 90mm f/3.2 is possibly a fraction less expensive. 

The only point of question is whether I would be using autofocus, and what my expectations of demand in using it might be ... I don't use autofocus very often, and haven't used either the SL2 or Summicron-SL 75mm lens (I had the SL and used it quite a lot, but the end of that time pre-dated the availability of the 75mm f/2 native lens). The Hasselblad XCD 90mm lens seems to focus quickly and accurately for me in this kind of portrait use situation and I'm happy with it... :) 

G

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ramarren said:

Both lenses and both cameras will make excellent photographs with on par lens quality.

For portraiture, I prefer the 4:3 proportions of the Hasselblad sensor. I'd have to crop away a healthy percentage of the SL2 frame to achieve that format, reducing the SL2's pixel resolution equality. Plus the Hasselblad X1D sensor has a dynamic range advantage. So I'd pick the Hasselblad over the Leica in this competition, never mind that the X1D II body plus XCD 90mm f/3.2 is possibly a fraction less expensive. 

The only point of question is whether I would be using autofocus, and what my expectations of demand in using it might be ... I don't use autofocus very often, and haven't used either the SL2 or Summicron-SL 75mm lens (I had the SL and used it quite a lot, but the end of that time pre-dated the availability of the 75mm f/2 native lens). The Hasselblad XCD 90mm lens seems to focus quickly and accurately for me in this kind of portrait use situation and I'm happy with it... :) 

G

Great.. honestly, this is what I wanted to hear.. I don’t have the x1d II but have the x1d and the 90mm is on its way to me.. it’s comes at half the price of the Leica 75mm so I was wondering if twice the price and reduced format size can be justified.. I saw some image samples of the XCD 90mm and was pleased with the 3D pop in that too

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the XCD 90mm lens on the Hasselblad 907x body. My (second hand) example arrived last week and I went out to test it. I've owned and used the Leica Summilux-M 75mm f/1.4 in the film era and still have my Summarit-M 75mm f/2.4 (used on SL, M-P240, M-D262 in the past, and now CL + M4-2 bodies). 

The XCD 90mm lens does not disappoint at all! This is a link to a gallery of my first walk and test shoot using the lens. I mostly kept to f/3.2 to f/6.8 since I had reasonably good if modest light throughout the outing: Santa Clara Neighborhood Walk 2021

I'm sure you'll like it. It's a delightful lens, not too big and not too heavy. I'd considered the XCD 80/1.9 as well, but it is quite a lot heavier and a bit larger, but then the deal for this 90mm example came up at an excellent price and I could not resist it.  : 

G

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, ramarren said:

I use the XCD 90mm lens on the Hasselblad 907x body. My (second hand) example arrived last week and I went out to test it. I've owned and used the Leica Summilux-M 75mm f/1.4 in the film era and still have my Summarit-M 75mm f/2.4 (used on SL, M-P240, M-D262 in the past, and now CL + M4-2 bodies). 

The XCD 90mm lens does not disappoint at all! This is a link to a gallery of my first walk and test shoot using the lens. I mostly kept to f/3.2 to f/6.8 since I had reasonably good if modest light throughout the outing: Santa Clara Neighborhood Walk 2021

I'm sure you'll like it. It's a delightful lens, not too big and not too heavy. I'd considered the XCD 80/1.9 as well, but it is quite a lot heavier and a bit larger, but then the deal for this 90mm example came up at an excellent price and I could not resist it.  : 

G

Nice!! images are pretty sharp seeing on my iPad.. thanks for sharing.. i wasn’t keen on the 80mm because my gifs 80 f1.7 is preordered along with the 100s.. it will be a duplicate.. and I don’t plan on getting more xcd lenses.. the 45p and the 90 are going to be more than enough with the other options I have.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, aksclix said:

Nice!! images are pretty sharp seeing on my iPad.. thanks for sharing.. i wasn’t keen on the 80mm because my gifs 80 f1.7 is preordered along with the 100s.. it will be a duplicate.. and I don’t plan on getting more xcd lenses.. the 45p and the 90 are going to be more than enough with the other options I have.. 

I have the XCD 21mm as well, and will acquire the XCD 120mm macro lens as well at some point. (I have plenty of other macro lens options, several of which I can adapt to the 907x, so the XCD 120 macro is a low priority.) I tend to use the 45P the most ... it's much like having the 80mm "normal" lens on a 500CM, always my most used lens. All the XCD lenses are excellent quality performers, the rendering differences to other lenses are nuances and a matter of what you like a little more as Alistairm points out. 

The full resolution images are sharper than the JPEGs you can find on Flickr.com. I post to Flickr.com usually at 1/2  pixel resolution to save space and download time. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
vor 7 Stunden schrieb aksclix:

What is that?

there is an option in the menue where you can choose if the 90xcd opens the aparture as much as possible or not. I would allow to open as much as possible, because it makes the bokeh at f3.2 nicer/rounder. (and I even forgot the disadvantage of choosing this option)

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tom0511 said:

there is an option in the menue where you can choose if the 90xcd opens the aparture as much as possible or not. I would allow to open as much as possible, because it makes the bokeh at f3.2 nicer/rounder. (and I even forgot the disadvantage of choosing this option)

I see.. will check that out.. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...