Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

How do these lenses compare in image quality? Anybody has any insights? I don't see anyone complaining about the 75mm Leica but will you be equally satisfied with the XCD 90mm is the primary question..

Let's say you're not a biased Leica shooter :) Which of the below setup would you choose for a day of portrait shooting?
a) X1D + XCD 90mm f3.2

b) SL2 or SL2-S + SL 75mm f2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both lenses and both cameras will make excellent photographs with on par lens quality.

For portraiture, I prefer the 4:3 proportions of the Hasselblad sensor. I'd have to crop away a healthy percentage of the SL2 frame to achieve that format, reducing the SL2's pixel resolution equality. Plus the Hasselblad X1D sensor has a dynamic range advantage. So I'd pick the Hasselblad over the Leica in this competition, never mind that the X1D II body plus XCD 90mm f/3.2 is possibly a fraction less expensive. 

The only point of question is whether I would be using autofocus, and what my expectations of demand in using it might be ... I don't use autofocus very often, and haven't used either the SL2 or Summicron-SL 75mm lens (I had the SL and used it quite a lot, but the end of that time pre-dated the availability of the 75mm f/2 native lens). The Hasselblad XCD 90mm lens seems to focus quickly and accurately for me in this kind of portrait use situation and I'm happy with it... :) 

G

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ramarren said:

Both lenses and both cameras will make excellent photographs with on par lens quality.

For portraiture, I prefer the 4:3 proportions of the Hasselblad sensor. I'd have to crop away a healthy percentage of the SL2 frame to achieve that format, reducing the SL2's pixel resolution equality. Plus the Hasselblad X1D sensor has a dynamic range advantage. So I'd pick the Hasselblad over the Leica in this competition, never mind that the X1D II body plus XCD 90mm f/3.2 is possibly a fraction less expensive. 

The only point of question is whether I would be using autofocus, and what my expectations of demand in using it might be ... I don't use autofocus very often, and haven't used either the SL2 or Summicron-SL 75mm lens (I had the SL and used it quite a lot, but the end of that time pre-dated the availability of the 75mm f/2 native lens). The Hasselblad XCD 90mm lens seems to focus quickly and accurately for me in this kind of portrait use situation and I'm happy with it... :) 

G

Great.. honestly, this is what I wanted to hear.. I don’t have the x1d II but have the x1d and the 90mm is on its way to me.. it’s comes at half the price of the Leica 75mm so I was wondering if twice the price and reduced format size can be justified.. I saw some image samples of the XCD 90mm and was pleased with the 3D pop in that too

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use the XCD 90mm lens on the Hasselblad 907x body. My (second hand) example arrived last week and I went out to test it. I've owned and used the Leica Summilux-M 75mm f/1.4 in the film era and still have my Summarit-M 75mm f/2.4 (used on SL, M-P240, M-D262 in the past, and now CL + M4-2 bodies). 

The XCD 90mm lens does not disappoint at all! This is a link to a gallery of my first walk and test shoot using the lens. I mostly kept to f/3.2 to f/6.8 since I had reasonably good if modest light throughout the outing: Santa Clara Neighborhood Walk 2021

I'm sure you'll like it. It's a delightful lens, not too big and not too heavy. I'd considered the XCD 80/1.9 as well, but it is quite a lot heavier and a bit larger, but then the deal for this 90mm example came up at an excellent price and I could not resist it.  : 

G

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, ramarren said:

I use the XCD 90mm lens on the Hasselblad 907x body. My (second hand) example arrived last week and I went out to test it. I've owned and used the Leica Summilux-M 75mm f/1.4 in the film era and still have my Summarit-M 75mm f/2.4 (used on SL, M-P240, M-D262 in the past, and now CL + M4-2 bodies). 

The XCD 90mm lens does not disappoint at all! This is a link to a gallery of my first walk and test shoot using the lens. I mostly kept to f/3.2 to f/6.8 since I had reasonably good if modest light throughout the outing: Santa Clara Neighborhood Walk 2021

I'm sure you'll like it. It's a delightful lens, not too big and not too heavy. I'd considered the XCD 80/1.9 as well, but it is quite a lot heavier and a bit larger, but then the deal for this 90mm example came up at an excellent price and I could not resist it.  : 

G

Nice!! images are pretty sharp seeing on my iPad.. thanks for sharing.. i wasn’t keen on the 80mm because my gifs 80 f1.7 is preordered along with the 100s.. it will be a duplicate.. and I don’t plan on getting more xcd lenses.. the 45p and the 90 are going to be more than enough with the other options I have.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, aksclix said:

Nice!! images are pretty sharp seeing on my iPad.. thanks for sharing.. i wasn’t keen on the 80mm because my gifs 80 f1.7 is preordered along with the 100s.. it will be a duplicate.. and I don’t plan on getting more xcd lenses.. the 45p and the 90 are going to be more than enough with the other options I have.. 

I have the XCD 21mm as well, and will acquire the XCD 120mm macro lens as well at some point. (I have plenty of other macro lens options, several of which I can adapt to the 907x, so the XCD 120 macro is a low priority.) I tend to use the 45P the most ... it's much like having the 80mm "normal" lens on a 500CM, always my most used lens. All the XCD lenses are excellent quality performers, the rendering differences to other lenses are nuances and a matter of what you like a little more as Alistairm points out. 

The full resolution images are sharper than the JPEGs you can find on Flickr.com. I post to Flickr.com usually at 1/2  pixel resolution to save space and download time. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
vor 7 Stunden schrieb aksclix:

What is that?

there is an option in the menue where you can choose if the 90xcd opens the aparture as much as possible or not. I would allow to open as much as possible, because it makes the bokeh at f3.2 nicer/rounder. (and I even forgot the disadvantage of choosing this option)

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tom0511 said:

there is an option in the menue where you can choose if the 90xcd opens the aparture as much as possible or not. I would allow to open as much as possible, because it makes the bokeh at f3.2 nicer/rounder. (and I even forgot the disadvantage of choosing this option)

I see.. will check that out.. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...