Could it be just the M ?

[Torpille]

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On Sunday I met an acquaintance. 
The idea was an objectiv swap and I would have gotten a Sl 24-90.  It did not work out. 

After our meeting I thought about it and made a decision.

Definitely the SL with the 24-90 is too heavy and big also for my shootings on location and will probably always stay at home. 

It was for me the reasons to sell my 2 Canon 6d and buy the 2 Cl. Actually I only bought the SL (and sold a CL) to use my M lenses and have a 85mm full frame for the portraits (This one I don't have yet).

Now I have also become unsure,I feel like I need to focus more on one camera. 

The M is incredible. Could it be just the M ?

I think I should the SL let go, because I don't have a full format autofocus lens for the system yet. Except the M lenses

CL I like very much but, with the M I do almost the same. With CL and M the image quality is very similar. 
But M has no autofocus. evf is extra and not so practical and has more weight. 
But it is a lot of fun to shoot with the M.
Maybe should I also sell the CL  

It is all a little unclear....

I would be happy to hear your recommendations.

[Advertisement]

The Leica Q3 is available for pre-order at B&H Photo Video and Adorama

[lb1800]

How about keeping the CL and adding an M?  Autofocus and tele lenses for when needed. Use M lenses on both. This is what I do. Although in fact I use my M 95% of the time...

[ynp]

I bought the M10r to supplement my CL and I am going for a two month trip with my M10 r and the CL with the long APO Zoom. For me it’s a perfect combo and I will be leaving my other , heavier, cameras at home. 

[jplomley]

M10-R and M10M seems the perfect combination for easily the next decade (or longer)

[Harvard Kiwi]

I recommend an M and keeping your CL as a 2nd camera. The AF would come in handy sometimes and its smaller size is great.